探索途径:朋友的反学术行为如何导致语文和数学成绩的性别差距

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Margriet van Hek
{"title":"探索途径:朋友的反学术行为如何导致语文和数学成绩的性别差距","authors":"Margriet van Hek","doi":"10.1016/j.rssm.2025.101042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the role of friends in the establishment of the gender gap in grades in secondary education. Specifically, it explores to what extent and through what pathways the anti-academic behavior of friends in school affects the gender gap in grades for the national language and math. Hypotheses are tested with two waves of the CILS4EU data that contain information about students and their schools in Sweden, the Netherlands, England and Germany (n = 10,164). Multilevel mediation models show that girls receive considerably higher grades than boys for the national language and that boys have a small advantage in math. Gender gaps in grades are affected by friends’ anti-academic behavior. Boys’ friends more often engage in anti-academic behavior, and this directly negatively impacts grades, but also works indirectly as it stimulates students’ own anti-academic behavior which in turn is detrimental to grades.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47384,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring pathways: How friends' anti-academic behavior contributes to the gender gap in language and math grades\",\"authors\":\"Margriet van Hek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rssm.2025.101042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the role of friends in the establishment of the gender gap in grades in secondary education. Specifically, it explores to what extent and through what pathways the anti-academic behavior of friends in school affects the gender gap in grades for the national language and math. Hypotheses are tested with two waves of the CILS4EU data that contain information about students and their schools in Sweden, the Netherlands, England and Germany (n = 10,164). Multilevel mediation models show that girls receive considerably higher grades than boys for the national language and that boys have a small advantage in math. Gender gaps in grades are affected by friends’ anti-academic behavior. Boys’ friends more often engage in anti-academic behavior, and this directly negatively impacts grades, but also works indirectly as it stimulates students’ own anti-academic behavior which in turn is detrimental to grades.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562425000332\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social Stratification and Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0276562425000332","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了朋友在中等教育年级性别差距形成中的作用。具体来说,它探讨了学校里朋友的反学术行为在多大程度上以及通过什么途径影响了国家语言和数学成绩的性别差距。假设通过两波CILS4EU数据进行检验,这些数据包含瑞典、荷兰、英国和德国的学生及其学校的信息(n = 10,164)。多层中介模型显示,女孩在国家语言方面的成绩明显高于男孩,男孩在数学方面有一点优势。成绩上的性别差距受到朋友反学术行为的影响。男生的朋友往往会有反学术的行为,这直接对成绩产生负面影响,但也会间接地刺激学生自己的反学术行为,而这反过来又对成绩有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring pathways: How friends' anti-academic behavior contributes to the gender gap in language and math grades
This study investigates the role of friends in the establishment of the gender gap in grades in secondary education. Specifically, it explores to what extent and through what pathways the anti-academic behavior of friends in school affects the gender gap in grades for the national language and math. Hypotheses are tested with two waves of the CILS4EU data that contain information about students and their schools in Sweden, the Netherlands, England and Germany (n = 10,164). Multilevel mediation models show that girls receive considerably higher grades than boys for the national language and that boys have a small advantage in math. Gender gaps in grades are affected by friends’ anti-academic behavior. Boys’ friends more often engage in anti-academic behavior, and this directly negatively impacts grades, but also works indirectly as it stimulates students’ own anti-academic behavior which in turn is detrimental to grades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility is dedicated to publishing the highest, most innovative research on issues of social inequality from a broad diversity of theoretical and methodological perspectives. The journal is also dedicated to cutting edge summaries of prior research and fruitful exchanges that will stimulate future research on issues of social inequality. The study of social inequality is and has been one of the central preoccupations of social scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信