半干旱草地平行放牧与刈割对化学计量联系及昆虫群落组成的影响

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Nazim Hassan , Zhengwen Wang , Yu Zhu
{"title":"半干旱草地平行放牧与刈割对化学计量联系及昆虫群落组成的影响","authors":"Nazim Hassan ,&nbsp;Zhengwen Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the two major management practices for grasslands, livestock grazing and mowing greatly influence the soil-plant-insect cascading effects, which can be reflected by their associations in stoichiometry. While previous studies have investigated the effect of grazing or moving on plants, soils and insects in grasslands, few have purposely made a sound comparison between the effects of paralleled grazing and mowing on soil-plant-insect stoichiometric linkages and insect community composition in a semi-arid grassland. In a four year field manipulative experiment, we investigated how paralleled grazing and mowing affect C:N:P stoichiometric linkages among soil, dominant plant (<em>Leymus chine</em><em>n</em><em>sis</em>) and dominant insect herbivore (<em>Euchorthippus</em> grasshopper), as well as insect community composition in a semi-arid grassland in northeastern China. We noted that grazing significantly increased soil and plant total N concentration but decreased their C:N, whereas both grazing and mowing failed to affect C:N:P stoichiometry of grasshoppers. Our results uphold the concept that organisms at higher trophic levels exhibit higher elemental homeostasis against disturbances. The total abundance and species evenness of insects were not affected, whereas grazing significantly increased insect species richness by 17 % compared to mowing. Mowing reduced predator insect abundance by 27 %, whereas grazing increased detritivore insect abundance by 18 %. Our study suggests that cattle grazing is better than mowing in terms of improving soil and plant nutrient and diversifying insects (beneficial in most cases), but longer-term investigations are needed to study the effects of paralleled grazing and mowing on stoichiometric linkages and insect community composition in grasslands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 125419"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of paralleled grazing and mowing on stoichiometric linkages and insect community composition in semi-arid grassland\",\"authors\":\"Nazim Hassan ,&nbsp;Zhengwen Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As the two major management practices for grasslands, livestock grazing and mowing greatly influence the soil-plant-insect cascading effects, which can be reflected by their associations in stoichiometry. While previous studies have investigated the effect of grazing or moving on plants, soils and insects in grasslands, few have purposely made a sound comparison between the effects of paralleled grazing and mowing on soil-plant-insect stoichiometric linkages and insect community composition in a semi-arid grassland. In a four year field manipulative experiment, we investigated how paralleled grazing and mowing affect C:N:P stoichiometric linkages among soil, dominant plant (<em>Leymus chine</em><em>n</em><em>sis</em>) and dominant insect herbivore (<em>Euchorthippus</em> grasshopper), as well as insect community composition in a semi-arid grassland in northeastern China. We noted that grazing significantly increased soil and plant total N concentration but decreased their C:N, whereas both grazing and mowing failed to affect C:N:P stoichiometry of grasshoppers. Our results uphold the concept that organisms at higher trophic levels exhibit higher elemental homeostasis against disturbances. The total abundance and species evenness of insects were not affected, whereas grazing significantly increased insect species richness by 17 % compared to mowing. Mowing reduced predator insect abundance by 27 %, whereas grazing increased detritivore insect abundance by 18 %. Our study suggests that cattle grazing is better than mowing in terms of improving soil and plant nutrient and diversifying insects (beneficial in most cases), but longer-term investigations are needed to study the effects of paralleled grazing and mowing on stoichiometric linkages and insect community composition in grasslands.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"382 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013957\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013957","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放牧和刈割作为草地的两种主要经营方式,对土壤-植物-昆虫级联效应的影响很大,这可以通过它们在化学计量学上的关联来反映。虽然以往的研究已经探讨了放牧或移动对草地植物、土壤和昆虫的影响,但很少有研究有意比较放牧和刈割对半干旱草地土壤-植物-昆虫化学计量联系和昆虫群落组成的影响。通过4年的田间操作试验,研究了平行放牧和刈割对中国东北半干旱草地土壤、优势植物羊草和优势食草昆虫间C:N:P化学计量学联系以及昆虫群落组成的影响。放牧显著提高了土壤和植物全氮浓度,但降低了它们的C:N,而放牧和刈割对蝗虫的C:N:P化学计量特征没有影响。我们的结果支持这样一个概念,即在更高的营养水平的生物体表现出更高的元素稳态对抗干扰。昆虫的总丰度和物种均匀度不受影响,而昆虫物种丰富度较刈割显著增加17%。割草使捕食昆虫的数量减少了27%,而放牧使食腐昆虫的数量增加了18%。研究表明,放牧在改善土壤和植物养分以及昆虫多样性方面优于割草(多数情况下是有益的),但需要长期研究放牧和割草对草地化学计量联系和昆虫群落组成的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of paralleled grazing and mowing on stoichiometric linkages and insect community composition in semi-arid grassland
As the two major management practices for grasslands, livestock grazing and mowing greatly influence the soil-plant-insect cascading effects, which can be reflected by their associations in stoichiometry. While previous studies have investigated the effect of grazing or moving on plants, soils and insects in grasslands, few have purposely made a sound comparison between the effects of paralleled grazing and mowing on soil-plant-insect stoichiometric linkages and insect community composition in a semi-arid grassland. In a four year field manipulative experiment, we investigated how paralleled grazing and mowing affect C:N:P stoichiometric linkages among soil, dominant plant (Leymus chinensis) and dominant insect herbivore (Euchorthippus grasshopper), as well as insect community composition in a semi-arid grassland in northeastern China. We noted that grazing significantly increased soil and plant total N concentration but decreased their C:N, whereas both grazing and mowing failed to affect C:N:P stoichiometry of grasshoppers. Our results uphold the concept that organisms at higher trophic levels exhibit higher elemental homeostasis against disturbances. The total abundance and species evenness of insects were not affected, whereas grazing significantly increased insect species richness by 17 % compared to mowing. Mowing reduced predator insect abundance by 27 %, whereas grazing increased detritivore insect abundance by 18 %. Our study suggests that cattle grazing is better than mowing in terms of improving soil and plant nutrient and diversifying insects (beneficial in most cases), but longer-term investigations are needed to study the effects of paralleled grazing and mowing on stoichiometric linkages and insect community composition in grasslands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信