利用响应面模型优化辣木和明矾资源化混凝/絮凝处理埃塞俄比亚粪泥的多响应优化

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Akalu Melketsadik Woldeyohans , Esayas Alemayehu , Diederik P.L. Rousseau , Seid Tiku Mereta , Stijn W.H. Van Hulle
{"title":"利用响应面模型优化辣木和明矾资源化混凝/絮凝处理埃塞俄比亚粪泥的多响应优化","authors":"Akalu Melketsadik Woldeyohans ,&nbsp;Esayas Alemayehu ,&nbsp;Diederik P.L. Rousseau ,&nbsp;Seid Tiku Mereta ,&nbsp;Stijn W.H. Van Hulle","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Resource recovery based fecal sludge (FS) treatment is crucial for developing countries to align with Sustainable Development Goals 6 and 7, which target clean water and sanitation for all and affordable and clean energy, respectively. This study, therefore, compared the coagulation-flocculation potential of aqueous Moringa <em>stenopetala</em> seed extract (MSE) to that of alum from a resource recovery perspective. A response surface central composite design was employed, using pH and coagulant dose as independent variables for each coagulant, with five levels resulting in 13 total runs for each coagulant. Multi-response optimization and modelling, which was not addressed in previous similar studies on FS, was employed to maximize chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal and energy content of the sludge, increase total solid concentration and minimize sludge volume. The optimum working conditions for MSE were a dose of 216 mg/g TS of FS at pH 2.2, while for alum, the optimum dose was 98 mg/g TS of FS at pH 6. At these optimum conditions, MSE achieved 94 % COD removal, a calorific value of 18.4 MJ/kg, a sludge volume of 259 mL/L and a TS concentration of 48.8 g/L. In comparison, alum achieved 92 % COD removal, a calorific value of 17.3 MJ/kg, a sludge volume of 370 mL/L and a TS concentration of 32.7 g/L. These results emphasize that MSE has greater potential as a coagulant than alum from a resource recovery perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"382 ","pages":"Article 125328"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-response optimization of resource oriented coagulation/flocculation of fecal sludge from Ethiopia using Moringa stenopetala and alum by response surface modelling\",\"authors\":\"Akalu Melketsadik Woldeyohans ,&nbsp;Esayas Alemayehu ,&nbsp;Diederik P.L. Rousseau ,&nbsp;Seid Tiku Mereta ,&nbsp;Stijn W.H. Van Hulle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Resource recovery based fecal sludge (FS) treatment is crucial for developing countries to align with Sustainable Development Goals 6 and 7, which target clean water and sanitation for all and affordable and clean energy, respectively. This study, therefore, compared the coagulation-flocculation potential of aqueous Moringa <em>stenopetala</em> seed extract (MSE) to that of alum from a resource recovery perspective. A response surface central composite design was employed, using pH and coagulant dose as independent variables for each coagulant, with five levels resulting in 13 total runs for each coagulant. Multi-response optimization and modelling, which was not addressed in previous similar studies on FS, was employed to maximize chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal and energy content of the sludge, increase total solid concentration and minimize sludge volume. The optimum working conditions for MSE were a dose of 216 mg/g TS of FS at pH 2.2, while for alum, the optimum dose was 98 mg/g TS of FS at pH 6. At these optimum conditions, MSE achieved 94 % COD removal, a calorific value of 18.4 MJ/kg, a sludge volume of 259 mL/L and a TS concentration of 48.8 g/L. In comparison, alum achieved 92 % COD removal, a calorific value of 17.3 MJ/kg, a sludge volume of 370 mL/L and a TS concentration of 32.7 g/L. These results emphasize that MSE has greater potential as a coagulant than alum from a resource recovery perspective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\"382 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013040\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479725013040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于资源回收的粪便污泥处理对于发展中国家实现可持续发展目标6和7至关重要,这两个目标分别针对人人享有清洁水和卫生以及可负担的清洁能源。因此,本研究从资源回收的角度比较了辣木籽提取物(MSE)与明矾水溶液的混凝絮凝潜力。采用响应面中心复合设计,将pH和混凝剂剂量作为每种混凝剂的自变量,五个水平导致每种混凝剂总共运行13次。采用多响应优化和建模,最大限度地提高污泥的化学需氧量(COD)去除率和能量含量,提高总固体浓度,最大限度地减少污泥体积,这是以往类似FS研究中没有解决的问题。MSE的最佳工艺条件为ph2.2时,216mg /g TS FS;明矾的最佳工艺条件为ph6时,98 mg/g TS FS。在这些最佳条件下,MSE的COD去除率为94%,热值为18.4 MJ/kg,污泥体积为259 mL/L, TS浓度为48.8 g/L。相比之下,明矾的COD去除率为92%,热值为17.3 MJ/kg,污泥体积为370 mL/L, TS浓度为32.7 g/L。这些结果强调,从资源回收的角度来看,MSE作为混凝剂比明矾具有更大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-response optimization of resource oriented coagulation/flocculation of fecal sludge from Ethiopia using Moringa stenopetala and alum by response surface modelling
Resource recovery based fecal sludge (FS) treatment is crucial for developing countries to align with Sustainable Development Goals 6 and 7, which target clean water and sanitation for all and affordable and clean energy, respectively. This study, therefore, compared the coagulation-flocculation potential of aqueous Moringa stenopetala seed extract (MSE) to that of alum from a resource recovery perspective. A response surface central composite design was employed, using pH and coagulant dose as independent variables for each coagulant, with five levels resulting in 13 total runs for each coagulant. Multi-response optimization and modelling, which was not addressed in previous similar studies on FS, was employed to maximize chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal and energy content of the sludge, increase total solid concentration and minimize sludge volume. The optimum working conditions for MSE were a dose of 216 mg/g TS of FS at pH 2.2, while for alum, the optimum dose was 98 mg/g TS of FS at pH 6. At these optimum conditions, MSE achieved 94 % COD removal, a calorific value of 18.4 MJ/kg, a sludge volume of 259 mL/L and a TS concentration of 48.8 g/L. In comparison, alum achieved 92 % COD removal, a calorific value of 17.3 MJ/kg, a sludge volume of 370 mL/L and a TS concentration of 32.7 g/L. These results emphasize that MSE has greater potential as a coagulant than alum from a resource recovery perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信