Nishtha Saxena, Emmanuel Mena-Morcillo, Mia Tripp, Peter George Keech, Mehran Behazin and Samantha Michelle Gateman*,
{"title":"使用缩回曲线的扫描电化学细胞显微镜中湿表面积的原位定量","authors":"Nishtha Saxena, Emmanuel Mena-Morcillo, Mia Tripp, Peter George Keech, Mehran Behazin and Samantha Michelle Gateman*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c0004210.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This work presents a new methodology to estimate the surface area of the working electrode during scanning electrochemical cell microscopy (SECCM) <i>in situ</i> by utilizing retraction curves. In this approach, the current is measured as a function of pipet displacement in the <i>z</i>-direction. When the current drops to zero, it is indicative of droplet detachment from the surface, allowing for the estimation of the droplet contact diameter based on the pipet displacement. This enables real-time estimations of surface areas of the wetted electrode at each point of measurement, rather than performing time-consuming measurements using <i>ex situ</i> correlative image analysis or estimating an average working electrode size from the pipet aperture. Notably, during SECCM measurements on copper in nitric acid, the working electrode diameter estimated using retraction curves was significantly smaller than the droplet footprint diameter observed post experiment using <i>ex situ</i> correlative image analysis. This discrepancy is attributed to droplet spreading after pipet retraction, as confirmed by goniometer and silanized pipet measurements. Upon cleaning the surface, the true wetted surface areas during SECCM measurements were found to be in good agreement with values estimated using retraction curves yet were larger than the pipet aperture. Additionally, the effects of approach separation, retraction rates, and probe diameter on the droplet contact size were analyzed using retraction curves. These findings were compared to <i>ex situ</i> methods to assess the reliability of the retraction curves for determining the working electrode surface area. This study demonstrates the potential of retraction curves to provide a higher accuracy in the quantitative analysis of local current density values extracted using SECCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":29800,"journal":{"name":"ACS Measurement Science Au","volume":"5 2","pages":"178–188 178–188"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Situ Quantification of a Wetted Surface Area during Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy Using Retraction Curves\",\"authors\":\"Nishtha Saxena, Emmanuel Mena-Morcillo, Mia Tripp, Peter George Keech, Mehran Behazin and Samantha Michelle Gateman*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c0004210.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This work presents a new methodology to estimate the surface area of the working electrode during scanning electrochemical cell microscopy (SECCM) <i>in situ</i> by utilizing retraction curves. In this approach, the current is measured as a function of pipet displacement in the <i>z</i>-direction. When the current drops to zero, it is indicative of droplet detachment from the surface, allowing for the estimation of the droplet contact diameter based on the pipet displacement. This enables real-time estimations of surface areas of the wetted electrode at each point of measurement, rather than performing time-consuming measurements using <i>ex situ</i> correlative image analysis or estimating an average working electrode size from the pipet aperture. Notably, during SECCM measurements on copper in nitric acid, the working electrode diameter estimated using retraction curves was significantly smaller than the droplet footprint diameter observed post experiment using <i>ex situ</i> correlative image analysis. This discrepancy is attributed to droplet spreading after pipet retraction, as confirmed by goniometer and silanized pipet measurements. Upon cleaning the surface, the true wetted surface areas during SECCM measurements were found to be in good agreement with values estimated using retraction curves yet were larger than the pipet aperture. Additionally, the effects of approach separation, retraction rates, and probe diameter on the droplet contact size were analyzed using retraction curves. These findings were compared to <i>ex situ</i> methods to assess the reliability of the retraction curves for determining the working electrode surface area. This study demonstrates the potential of retraction curves to provide a higher accuracy in the quantitative analysis of local current density values extracted using SECCM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Measurement Science Au\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"178–188 178–188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00042\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Measurement Science Au\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Measurement Science Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.4c00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Situ Quantification of a Wetted Surface Area during Scanning Electrochemical Cell Microscopy Using Retraction Curves
This work presents a new methodology to estimate the surface area of the working electrode during scanning electrochemical cell microscopy (SECCM) in situ by utilizing retraction curves. In this approach, the current is measured as a function of pipet displacement in the z-direction. When the current drops to zero, it is indicative of droplet detachment from the surface, allowing for the estimation of the droplet contact diameter based on the pipet displacement. This enables real-time estimations of surface areas of the wetted electrode at each point of measurement, rather than performing time-consuming measurements using ex situ correlative image analysis or estimating an average working electrode size from the pipet aperture. Notably, during SECCM measurements on copper in nitric acid, the working electrode diameter estimated using retraction curves was significantly smaller than the droplet footprint diameter observed post experiment using ex situ correlative image analysis. This discrepancy is attributed to droplet spreading after pipet retraction, as confirmed by goniometer and silanized pipet measurements. Upon cleaning the surface, the true wetted surface areas during SECCM measurements were found to be in good agreement with values estimated using retraction curves yet were larger than the pipet aperture. Additionally, the effects of approach separation, retraction rates, and probe diameter on the droplet contact size were analyzed using retraction curves. These findings were compared to ex situ methods to assess the reliability of the retraction curves for determining the working electrode surface area. This study demonstrates the potential of retraction curves to provide a higher accuracy in the quantitative analysis of local current density values extracted using SECCM.
期刊介绍:
ACS Measurement Science Au is an open access journal that publishes experimental computational or theoretical research in all areas of chemical measurement science. Short letters comprehensive articles reviews and perspectives are welcome on topics that report on any phase of analytical operations including sampling measurement and data analysis. This includes:Chemical Reactions and SelectivityChemometrics and Data ProcessingElectrochemistryElemental and Molecular CharacterizationImagingInstrumentationMass SpectrometryMicroscale and Nanoscale systemsOmics (Genomics Proteomics Metabonomics Metabolomics and Bioinformatics)Sensors and Sensing (Biosensors Chemical Sensors Gas Sensors Intracellular Sensors Single-Molecule Sensors Cell Chips Arrays Microfluidic Devices)SeparationsSpectroscopySurface analysisPapers dealing with established methods need to offer a significantly improved original application of the method.