双膦酸盐治疗小鼠植入体周围炎症增加骨坏死的风险

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ana Bujila, Davi N. A. Silva, Sepehr Monajemzadeh, Taciane M. da Silveira, Naseim Elzakra, Maísa Casarin, Kimberly Flores, Clara Magyar, Julie Marchesan, Reuben Kim, Sotirios Tetradis, Flavia Q. Pirih
{"title":"双膦酸盐治疗小鼠植入体周围炎症增加骨坏死的风险","authors":"Ana Bujila, Davi N. A. Silva, Sepehr Monajemzadeh, Taciane M. da Silveira, Naseim Elzakra, Maísa Casarin, Kimberly Flores, Clara Magyar, Julie Marchesan, Reuben Kim, Sotirios Tetradis, Flavia Q. Pirih","doi":"10.1002/jper.24-0760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundBisphosphonates (BPs) are effective in managing bone diseases due to their anti‐resorptive properties but are linked to medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), particularly concerning dental implants. This study explored the combined impact of ligature‐induced peri‐implant inflammation and zoledronic acid (ZA), a BP, using a murine model.MethodsTwenty‐four mice underwent bilateral maxillary molar extractions and implant placements, with ZA or vehicle treatment and ligature placement on the left side. Two groups were defined: group 1 (vehicle‐treated) with control (Veh‐C) and ligature (Veh‐L) implants, and group 2 (ZA‐treated) with control (ZA‐C) and ligature (ZA‐L) implants. Clinical, micro‐CT, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. We hypothesized that peri‐implant inflammation elevates MRONJ risk with BP treatment.ResultsLigature groups showed increased soft tissue edema compared to controls, without differences between vehicle and ZA treatments. The Veh‐L group exhibited significantly greater bone loss than other groups. Histology showed higher inflammatory infiltrate in ligature groups. Osteocyte empty lacunae and osteonecrosis were significantly greater in ZA‐L. Picrosirius red staining revealed disorganized collagen fibers and separation in ZA‐L. Immunohistochemistry showed increased neutrophils (NIMP‐R14+) and monocytes/macrophages (CD11b+) in the ligature groups, with no significant differences between Veh‐C and ZA‐C.ConclusionLigature treatment enhances peri‐implant inflammation, with ZA heightening the risk of MRONJ. These findings highlight the critical importance of early detection and management of peri‐implant inflammation in patients undergoing BP therapy, particularly those at high risk of MRONJ. Clinicians should emphasize preventive measures, such as regular monitoring of peri‐implant health and reducing local inflammatory triggers, to mitigate the adverse effects of BPs on peri‐implant bone health.Plain language summaryDental implants are a reliable solution to replace missing teeth. However, like natural teeth, implants can develop inflammation around them—peri‐implantitis. Our study found that, when this inflammation occurs in patients taking BPs (a medication commonly used to treat osteoporosis and other bone diseases), the risk of developing a serious jaw condition called osteonecrosis (ONJ) increases significantly. ONJ prevents the jawbone from healing properly, leading to pain, infection, and even exposed bone. These findings highlight the importance of preventing and managing inflammation around dental implants to reduce the risk of complications, especially in patients taking BPs. Our research suggests regular dental check‐ups and proper oral hygiene can help maintain implant health and prevent severe bone‐related conditions. Patients and healthcare providers can take proactive steps to improve long‐term oral health outcomes by understanding these risks.","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peri‐implant inflammation increases the risk of osteonecrosis in mice treated with bisphosphonate\",\"authors\":\"Ana Bujila, Davi N. A. Silva, Sepehr Monajemzadeh, Taciane M. da Silveira, Naseim Elzakra, Maísa Casarin, Kimberly Flores, Clara Magyar, Julie Marchesan, Reuben Kim, Sotirios Tetradis, Flavia Q. Pirih\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jper.24-0760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundBisphosphonates (BPs) are effective in managing bone diseases due to their anti‐resorptive properties but are linked to medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), particularly concerning dental implants. This study explored the combined impact of ligature‐induced peri‐implant inflammation and zoledronic acid (ZA), a BP, using a murine model.MethodsTwenty‐four mice underwent bilateral maxillary molar extractions and implant placements, with ZA or vehicle treatment and ligature placement on the left side. Two groups were defined: group 1 (vehicle‐treated) with control (Veh‐C) and ligature (Veh‐L) implants, and group 2 (ZA‐treated) with control (ZA‐C) and ligature (ZA‐L) implants. Clinical, micro‐CT, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. We hypothesized that peri‐implant inflammation elevates MRONJ risk with BP treatment.ResultsLigature groups showed increased soft tissue edema compared to controls, without differences between vehicle and ZA treatments. The Veh‐L group exhibited significantly greater bone loss than other groups. Histology showed higher inflammatory infiltrate in ligature groups. Osteocyte empty lacunae and osteonecrosis were significantly greater in ZA‐L. Picrosirius red staining revealed disorganized collagen fibers and separation in ZA‐L. Immunohistochemistry showed increased neutrophils (NIMP‐R14+) and monocytes/macrophages (CD11b+) in the ligature groups, with no significant differences between Veh‐C and ZA‐C.ConclusionLigature treatment enhances peri‐implant inflammation, with ZA heightening the risk of MRONJ. These findings highlight the critical importance of early detection and management of peri‐implant inflammation in patients undergoing BP therapy, particularly those at high risk of MRONJ. Clinicians should emphasize preventive measures, such as regular monitoring of peri‐implant health and reducing local inflammatory triggers, to mitigate the adverse effects of BPs on peri‐implant bone health.Plain language summaryDental implants are a reliable solution to replace missing teeth. However, like natural teeth, implants can develop inflammation around them—peri‐implantitis. Our study found that, when this inflammation occurs in patients taking BPs (a medication commonly used to treat osteoporosis and other bone diseases), the risk of developing a serious jaw condition called osteonecrosis (ONJ) increases significantly. ONJ prevents the jawbone from healing properly, leading to pain, infection, and even exposed bone. These findings highlight the importance of preventing and managing inflammation around dental implants to reduce the risk of complications, especially in patients taking BPs. Our research suggests regular dental check‐ups and proper oral hygiene can help maintain implant health and prevent severe bone‐related conditions. Patients and healthcare providers can take proactive steps to improve long‐term oral health outcomes by understanding these risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.24-0760\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.24-0760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双膦酸盐(bp)由于其抗骨吸收的特性,在治疗骨病方面是有效的,但与药物相关的颌骨骨坏死(MRONJ)有关,特别是与牙种植体有关。本研究通过小鼠模型探讨了结扎诱导的种植体周围炎症和唑来膦酸(ZA,一种BP)的联合影响。方法24只小鼠进行了双侧上颌磨牙拔除和种植体放置,左侧进行ZA或载体处理和结扎放置。分为两组:1组(载体处理)采用对照(Veh‐C)和结扎(Veh‐L)种植体,2组(ZA‐处理)采用对照(ZA‐C)和结扎(ZA‐L)种植体。进行了临床、显微CT、组织学和免疫组织化学分析。我们假设种植体周围炎症会增加BP治疗的MRONJ风险。结果与对照组相比,结扎组的软组织水肿增加,与ZA组相比没有差异。Veh‐L组骨质流失明显大于其他组。结扎组组织学表现为较高的炎症浸润。骨细胞空腔隙和骨坏死在ZA‐L组明显增加。小天狼星红染色显示ZA - L胶原纤维紊乱和分离。免疫组织化学显示结扎组中性粒细胞(NIMP‐R14+)和单核/巨噬细胞(CD11b+)增加,Veh‐C和ZA‐C之间无显著差异。结论结扎治疗可增加种植体周围炎症,ZA可增加MRONJ的发生风险。这些发现强调了早期发现和处理BP治疗患者种植体周围炎症的重要性,特别是那些MRONJ高风险患者。临床医生应强调预防措施,如定期监测种植体周围健康和减少局部炎症诱因,以减轻bp对种植体周围骨骼健康的不良影响。植牙是替代缺牙的可靠方法。然而,就像天然牙齿一样,种植体周围也会发生炎症——种植体周围炎。我们的研究发现,当这种炎症发生在服用bp(一种通常用于治疗骨质疏松症和其他骨骼疾病的药物)的患者身上时,患严重的颌骨疾病骨坏死(ONJ)的风险会显著增加。ONJ会阻止颌骨正常愈合,导致疼痛、感染,甚至骨头暴露。这些发现强调了预防和控制种植体周围炎症的重要性,以减少并发症的风险,特别是在服用bp的患者中。我们的研究表明,定期的牙齿检查和适当的口腔卫生有助于保持种植体健康,预防严重的骨相关疾病。患者和医疗保健提供者可以通过了解这些风险,采取积极措施来改善长期口腔健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peri‐implant inflammation increases the risk of osteonecrosis in mice treated with bisphosphonate
BackgroundBisphosphonates (BPs) are effective in managing bone diseases due to their anti‐resorptive properties but are linked to medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), particularly concerning dental implants. This study explored the combined impact of ligature‐induced peri‐implant inflammation and zoledronic acid (ZA), a BP, using a murine model.MethodsTwenty‐four mice underwent bilateral maxillary molar extractions and implant placements, with ZA or vehicle treatment and ligature placement on the left side. Two groups were defined: group 1 (vehicle‐treated) with control (Veh‐C) and ligature (Veh‐L) implants, and group 2 (ZA‐treated) with control (ZA‐C) and ligature (ZA‐L) implants. Clinical, micro‐CT, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. We hypothesized that peri‐implant inflammation elevates MRONJ risk with BP treatment.ResultsLigature groups showed increased soft tissue edema compared to controls, without differences between vehicle and ZA treatments. The Veh‐L group exhibited significantly greater bone loss than other groups. Histology showed higher inflammatory infiltrate in ligature groups. Osteocyte empty lacunae and osteonecrosis were significantly greater in ZA‐L. Picrosirius red staining revealed disorganized collagen fibers and separation in ZA‐L. Immunohistochemistry showed increased neutrophils (NIMP‐R14+) and monocytes/macrophages (CD11b+) in the ligature groups, with no significant differences between Veh‐C and ZA‐C.ConclusionLigature treatment enhances peri‐implant inflammation, with ZA heightening the risk of MRONJ. These findings highlight the critical importance of early detection and management of peri‐implant inflammation in patients undergoing BP therapy, particularly those at high risk of MRONJ. Clinicians should emphasize preventive measures, such as regular monitoring of peri‐implant health and reducing local inflammatory triggers, to mitigate the adverse effects of BPs on peri‐implant bone health.Plain language summaryDental implants are a reliable solution to replace missing teeth. However, like natural teeth, implants can develop inflammation around them—peri‐implantitis. Our study found that, when this inflammation occurs in patients taking BPs (a medication commonly used to treat osteoporosis and other bone diseases), the risk of developing a serious jaw condition called osteonecrosis (ONJ) increases significantly. ONJ prevents the jawbone from healing properly, leading to pain, infection, and even exposed bone. These findings highlight the importance of preventing and managing inflammation around dental implants to reduce the risk of complications, especially in patients taking BPs. Our research suggests regular dental check‐ups and proper oral hygiene can help maintain implant health and prevent severe bone‐related conditions. Patients and healthcare providers can take proactive steps to improve long‐term oral health outcomes by understanding these risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of periodontology
Journal of periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Periodontology publishes articles relevant to the science and practice of periodontics and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信