{"title":"关节内透明质酸对骨关节炎症状的疗效及相关因素的定量分析:随机试验的系统回顾和基于模型的荟萃分析。","authors":"Ying Cao,Ruifen Cai,Shun Han,Zewei Li,Kang Ma,Zhounan Zhou,Xin Wen,Weizhong Qi,Han Cen,Weiyu Han,Tianyu Chen,Shengfa Li,Lijun Lin,Lixin Zhu,Yulong Cao,Cailiang Shen,Siu Ngor Fu,Kim Bennell,David J Hunter,Changhai Ding,Lujin Li,Zhaohua Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThe literature on the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) to treat osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial, and the applicable subpopulation is unclear. Our study aimed to quantitatively evaluate HA efficacy and identify potential responders who would benefit most from HA.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nEmbase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to March 13, 2023. A pharmacodynamic Bateman function model was used to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy characteristics of HA treatments as well as placebo, while a covariate model was employed to identify factors that significantly affected efficacy.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn total, 24 101 participants with symptomatic or radiographic OA from 168 studies with aggregate data were included. Simulation analysis from the pharmacodynamic time-effect model showed that HA treatment effects plateaued at approximately 2 months. The final model analysis indicated that intra-articular injection of HA combined with corticosteroids (the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index [WOMAC] pain effect size [ES] = 4.4 [95% CI: 3.0 to 5.7]) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (WOMAC pain ES = 4.0 [95% CI: 2.7 to 5.3]) achieved the best efficacy compared with other groups (contrast between meta-analyses: WOMAC pain ES = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.2 to 5.2]). Subgroups analysis showed that younger (age < 65), overweight (BMI ≥ 25) knee OA patients, with more severe baseline symptoms and a lower Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade (≤ 2), could benefit more.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe quantitative model suggested that HA interventions were statistically more effective than placebo, with participants receiving HA+ corticosteroids (CS) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) experiencing the best efficacy. Patients with lower age, higher weight, higher severity of baseline symptoms, and lower KL grade appeared to benefit more from HA treatment.\r\n\r\nDATA AND MATERIALS AVAILABILITY\r\nAll data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative analysis of the efficacy and associated factors of intra-articular hyaluronic acid with respect to osteoarthritis symptoms: a systematic review of randomized trials and model-based meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Cao,Ruifen Cai,Shun Han,Zewei Li,Kang Ma,Zhounan Zhou,Xin Wen,Weizhong Qi,Han Cen,Weiyu Han,Tianyu Chen,Shengfa Li,Lijun Lin,Lixin Zhu,Yulong Cao,Cailiang Shen,Siu Ngor Fu,Kim Bennell,David J Hunter,Changhai Ding,Lujin Li,Zhaohua Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joca.2025.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThe literature on the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) to treat osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial, and the applicable subpopulation is unclear. Our study aimed to quantitatively evaluate HA efficacy and identify potential responders who would benefit most from HA.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHOD\\r\\nEmbase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to March 13, 2023. A pharmacodynamic Bateman function model was used to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy characteristics of HA treatments as well as placebo, while a covariate model was employed to identify factors that significantly affected efficacy.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nIn total, 24 101 participants with symptomatic or radiographic OA from 168 studies with aggregate data were included. Simulation analysis from the pharmacodynamic time-effect model showed that HA treatment effects plateaued at approximately 2 months. The final model analysis indicated that intra-articular injection of HA combined with corticosteroids (the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index [WOMAC] pain effect size [ES] = 4.4 [95% CI: 3.0 to 5.7]) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (WOMAC pain ES = 4.0 [95% CI: 2.7 to 5.3]) achieved the best efficacy compared with other groups (contrast between meta-analyses: WOMAC pain ES = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.2 to 5.2]). Subgroups analysis showed that younger (age < 65), overweight (BMI ≥ 25) knee OA patients, with more severe baseline symptoms and a lower Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade (≤ 2), could benefit more.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThe quantitative model suggested that HA interventions were statistically more effective than placebo, with participants receiving HA+ corticosteroids (CS) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) experiencing the best efficacy. Patients with lower age, higher weight, higher severity of baseline symptoms, and lower KL grade appeared to benefit more from HA treatment.\\r\\n\\r\\nDATA AND MATERIALS AVAILABILITY\\r\\nAll data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2025.01.008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2025.01.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantitative analysis of the efficacy and associated factors of intra-articular hyaluronic acid with respect to osteoarthritis symptoms: a systematic review of randomized trials and model-based meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
The literature on the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) to treat osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial, and the applicable subpopulation is unclear. Our study aimed to quantitatively evaluate HA efficacy and identify potential responders who would benefit most from HA.
METHOD
Embase, MEDLINE (PubMed), and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to March 13, 2023. A pharmacodynamic Bateman function model was used to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy characteristics of HA treatments as well as placebo, while a covariate model was employed to identify factors that significantly affected efficacy.
RESULTS
In total, 24 101 participants with symptomatic or radiographic OA from 168 studies with aggregate data were included. Simulation analysis from the pharmacodynamic time-effect model showed that HA treatment effects plateaued at approximately 2 months. The final model analysis indicated that intra-articular injection of HA combined with corticosteroids (the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index [WOMAC] pain effect size [ES] = 4.4 [95% CI: 3.0 to 5.7]) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (WOMAC pain ES = 4.0 [95% CI: 2.7 to 5.3]) achieved the best efficacy compared with other groups (contrast between meta-analyses: WOMAC pain ES = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.2 to 5.2]). Subgroups analysis showed that younger (age < 65), overweight (BMI ≥ 25) knee OA patients, with more severe baseline symptoms and a lower Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade (≤ 2), could benefit more.
CONCLUSION
The quantitative model suggested that HA interventions were statistically more effective than placebo, with participants receiving HA+ corticosteroids (CS) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) experiencing the best efficacy. Patients with lower age, higher weight, higher severity of baseline symptoms, and lower KL grade appeared to benefit more from HA treatment.
DATA AND MATERIALS AVAILABILITY
All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.
期刊介绍:
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.