Mohamed Hamdy Helal, Mona S. Sheta, Aya Anwar Alsherif, Mai Atef Hassan, Moustafa Nabil Aboushelib, Rehab F. Ghouraba
{"title":"透明质酸对预制CAD CAM骨块的有效性:一项裂口研究","authors":"Mohamed Hamdy Helal, Mona S. Sheta, Aya Anwar Alsherif, Mai Atef Hassan, Moustafa Nabil Aboushelib, Rehab F. Ghouraba","doi":"10.1111/cid.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Alveolar ridge augmentation has been one of the most accepted treatments for restoring bone volume. Various products are available in particle forms, which have limitations, especially related to controlling the expected volume gain. A prefabricated computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) allogenic bone block could provide a good alternative.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A split-mouth randomized clinical trial included 10 patients with the bilateral posterior atrophic mandible (20 sides), who were randomly assigned to two groups with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Group I: the ridge was augmented using prefabricated CAD-CAM allogenic bone block hydrated using hyaluronic acid, and group II was hydrated using saline. Blinding was limited to the patients and the investigator responsible for data analysis (double blinding). Six months after grafting surgery, a core biopsy was taken for histological analysis, and implants were inserted into the augmented ridge. The amount of bone gain was evaluated radiographically using CBCT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All ridges in both groups revealed a successful bone gain in CBCT. However, the mean bone gain in group I (3.975 ± 0.31) was significantly higher than in group II (2.497 ± 0.66). Histologically, both groups showed osteointegration and new bone formation, with group I being superior. VEGF, OPN, and Cox 2 expressions were more intense in group I than in group II. The histomorphometric analysis revealed that group I had a considerably higher surface area of new bone formation than group II (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001). Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF revealed a significant difference between groups I (15.04 ± 0.47) and II (11.41 ± 0.54).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Within the limitations of this study, the addition of HA to prefabricated CAD-CAM allogenic block enhanced its osteogenic properties and guaranteed adequate integration of the graft for implant insertion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>This clinical trial was not registered before the participants' recruitment and randomization (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06395818<span>)</span>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid on Prefabricated CAD CAM Bone Blocks for Ridge Augmentation: A Split Mouth Study\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Hamdy Helal, Mona S. Sheta, Aya Anwar Alsherif, Mai Atef Hassan, Moustafa Nabil Aboushelib, Rehab F. Ghouraba\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.70035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Alveolar ridge augmentation has been one of the most accepted treatments for restoring bone volume. Various products are available in particle forms, which have limitations, especially related to controlling the expected volume gain. A prefabricated computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) allogenic bone block could provide a good alternative.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A split-mouth randomized clinical trial included 10 patients with the bilateral posterior atrophic mandible (20 sides), who were randomly assigned to two groups with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Group I: the ridge was augmented using prefabricated CAD-CAM allogenic bone block hydrated using hyaluronic acid, and group II was hydrated using saline. Blinding was limited to the patients and the investigator responsible for data analysis (double blinding). Six months after grafting surgery, a core biopsy was taken for histological analysis, and implants were inserted into the augmented ridge. The amount of bone gain was evaluated radiographically using CBCT.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>All ridges in both groups revealed a successful bone gain in CBCT. However, the mean bone gain in group I (3.975 ± 0.31) was significantly higher than in group II (2.497 ± 0.66). Histologically, both groups showed osteointegration and new bone formation, with group I being superior. VEGF, OPN, and Cox 2 expressions were more intense in group I than in group II. The histomorphometric analysis revealed that group I had a considerably higher surface area of new bone formation than group II (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001). Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF revealed a significant difference between groups I (15.04 ± 0.47) and II (11.41 ± 0.54).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Within the limitations of this study, the addition of HA to prefabricated CAD-CAM allogenic block enhanced its osteogenic properties and guaranteed adequate integration of the graft for implant insertion.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\\n \\n <p>This clinical trial was not registered before the participants' recruitment and randomization (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06395818<span>)</span>.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"27 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70035\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid on Prefabricated CAD CAM Bone Blocks for Ridge Augmentation: A Split Mouth Study
Introduction
Alveolar ridge augmentation has been one of the most accepted treatments for restoring bone volume. Various products are available in particle forms, which have limitations, especially related to controlling the expected volume gain. A prefabricated computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) allogenic bone block could provide a good alternative.
Materials and Methods
A split-mouth randomized clinical trial included 10 patients with the bilateral posterior atrophic mandible (20 sides), who were randomly assigned to two groups with an allocation ratio of 1:1. Group I: the ridge was augmented using prefabricated CAD-CAM allogenic bone block hydrated using hyaluronic acid, and group II was hydrated using saline. Blinding was limited to the patients and the investigator responsible for data analysis (double blinding). Six months after grafting surgery, a core biopsy was taken for histological analysis, and implants were inserted into the augmented ridge. The amount of bone gain was evaluated radiographically using CBCT.
Results
All ridges in both groups revealed a successful bone gain in CBCT. However, the mean bone gain in group I (3.975 ± 0.31) was significantly higher than in group II (2.497 ± 0.66). Histologically, both groups showed osteointegration and new bone formation, with group I being superior. VEGF, OPN, and Cox 2 expressions were more intense in group I than in group II. The histomorphometric analysis revealed that group I had a considerably higher surface area of new bone formation than group II (p-value < 0.001). Immunohistochemical staining for VEGF revealed a significant difference between groups I (15.04 ± 0.47) and II (11.41 ± 0.54).
Conclusion
Within the limitations of this study, the addition of HA to prefabricated CAD-CAM allogenic block enhanced its osteogenic properties and guaranteed adequate integration of the graft for implant insertion.
Trial Registration
This clinical trial was not registered before the participants' recruitment and randomization (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06395818).
期刊介绍:
The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal.
The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to:
New scientific developments relating to bone
Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues
Computer aided implant designs
Computer aided prosthetic designs
Immediate implant loading
Immediate implant placement
Materials relating to bone induction and conduction
New surgical methods relating to implant placement
New materials and methods relating to implant restorations
Methods for determining implant stability
A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.