亚热带湿润温带气候放牧条件下高羊茅的灌溉策略

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
L. Puppo, R. Hayashi, P. Boggiano, J. M. Ernst, A. Beretta, P. Morales
{"title":"亚热带湿润温带气候放牧条件下高羊茅的灌溉策略","authors":"L. Puppo,&nbsp;R. Hayashi,&nbsp;P. Boggiano,&nbsp;J. M. Ernst,&nbsp;A. Beretta,&nbsp;P. Morales","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>During the last 10 years, there has been a rapid expansion of irrigation in pastures in Uruguay. It is necessary to define the irrigation management under grazing conditions to achieve the best balance between productivity and the sustainability of natural resources. A trial was established with the drought-sensitive <i>Festuca arundinacea</i> Schreb. cultivar INIA Aurora under grazing. During two and a half years, the following treatments were evaluated: frequent irrigation (T1), which was applied whenever 30% of the available water was depleted; spaced irrigation (T2), which was applied whenever 65% of the available water was depleted and rainfed treatment, which only received rainwater. The experimental design was a randomised complete block with four replications. Grazing was carried out every time the tall fescue reached 2.5 leaves. There was a significant difference in annual dry matter yield between the irrigated and rainfed treatments, but the irrigated treatments did not differ from each other. The average dry matter yield of irrigated treatments was 41% and 56% higher than the rainfed treatment for the first and second year of pasture, respectively. The spaced irrigation management resulted in a 38% saving in pumped water compared to frequent irrigation. However, when considering water productivity as a selection criterion, frequent irrigation would be the recommended irrigation strategy. Irrigation increases soil compaction in a grazing system, and with frequent irrigation management, this effect persists even up to 10 cm of soil depth.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Irrigation Strategies for Tall Fescue Under Grazing in a Humid Subtropical Temperate Climate\",\"authors\":\"L. Puppo,&nbsp;R. Hayashi,&nbsp;P. Boggiano,&nbsp;J. M. Ernst,&nbsp;A. Beretta,&nbsp;P. Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gfs.12708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>During the last 10 years, there has been a rapid expansion of irrigation in pastures in Uruguay. It is necessary to define the irrigation management under grazing conditions to achieve the best balance between productivity and the sustainability of natural resources. A trial was established with the drought-sensitive <i>Festuca arundinacea</i> Schreb. cultivar INIA Aurora under grazing. During two and a half years, the following treatments were evaluated: frequent irrigation (T1), which was applied whenever 30% of the available water was depleted; spaced irrigation (T2), which was applied whenever 65% of the available water was depleted and rainfed treatment, which only received rainwater. The experimental design was a randomised complete block with four replications. Grazing was carried out every time the tall fescue reached 2.5 leaves. There was a significant difference in annual dry matter yield between the irrigated and rainfed treatments, but the irrigated treatments did not differ from each other. The average dry matter yield of irrigated treatments was 41% and 56% higher than the rainfed treatment for the first and second year of pasture, respectively. The spaced irrigation management resulted in a 38% saving in pumped water compared to frequent irrigation. However, when considering water productivity as a selection criterion, frequent irrigation would be the recommended irrigation strategy. Irrigation increases soil compaction in a grazing system, and with frequent irrigation management, this effect persists even up to 10 cm of soil depth.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"volume\":\"80 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grass and Forage Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12708\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去十年中,乌拉圭的牧场灌溉迅速扩大。为了在生产力和自然资源的可持续性之间取得最佳平衡,有必要对放牧条件下的灌溉管理进行界定。用对干旱敏感的羊茅(Festuca arundinacea Schreb)进行了试验。放牧下栽培的紫霞。在两年半的时间里,对以下处理进行了评估:频繁灌溉(T1),当30%的可用水耗尽时进行灌溉;间隔灌溉(T2),当65%的可用水被耗尽时进行灌溉,雨养处理,只接收雨水。实验设计为随机完全区组,有4个重复。每次高羊茅长到2.5片叶子时进行放牧。灌水和雨养处理的年干物质产量差异显著,但灌水处理间差异不显著。牧草第一年和第二年,灌溉处理的平均干物质产量分别比雨养处理高41%和56%。与频繁灌溉相比,间隔灌溉管理可节省38%的抽水。然而,当考虑水分生产力作为选择标准时,频繁灌溉将是推荐的灌溉策略。在放牧系统中,灌溉增加了土壤的压实,如果经常进行灌溉管理,这种影响甚至会持续到10厘米的土壤深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Irrigation Strategies for Tall Fescue Under Grazing in a Humid Subtropical Temperate Climate

During the last 10 years, there has been a rapid expansion of irrigation in pastures in Uruguay. It is necessary to define the irrigation management under grazing conditions to achieve the best balance between productivity and the sustainability of natural resources. A trial was established with the drought-sensitive Festuca arundinacea Schreb. cultivar INIA Aurora under grazing. During two and a half years, the following treatments were evaluated: frequent irrigation (T1), which was applied whenever 30% of the available water was depleted; spaced irrigation (T2), which was applied whenever 65% of the available water was depleted and rainfed treatment, which only received rainwater. The experimental design was a randomised complete block with four replications. Grazing was carried out every time the tall fescue reached 2.5 leaves. There was a significant difference in annual dry matter yield between the irrigated and rainfed treatments, but the irrigated treatments did not differ from each other. The average dry matter yield of irrigated treatments was 41% and 56% higher than the rainfed treatment for the first and second year of pasture, respectively. The spaced irrigation management resulted in a 38% saving in pumped water compared to frequent irrigation. However, when considering water productivity as a selection criterion, frequent irrigation would be the recommended irrigation strategy. Irrigation increases soil compaction in a grazing system, and with frequent irrigation management, this effect persists even up to 10 cm of soil depth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信