覆层厚度对石灰岩集中荷载下抗弯强度的影响

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
João Senra, Amélia Dionísio, Gustavo Paneiro
{"title":"覆层厚度对石灰岩集中荷载下抗弯强度的影响","authors":"João Senra,&nbsp;Amélia Dionísio,&nbsp;Gustavo Paneiro","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02635-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The modern trend towards thinner and lighter cladding panels has begun to challenge the validity of current test standards. The evaluation of mechanical resistance of natural stone panels, particularly through the determination of flexural strength (FS) via EN 12372 standard, is becoming inconsistent with modern application methods. This is due to the standard requirement for a minimum sample thickness of 25 mm, which is often thicker than the actual cladding panels, leading to producers being unable to comply with the existing standard. Additionally, the heterogeneous disposition and complex structure of natural stone make FS's relationship with sample size reduction non-compliant with known size effect statistical laws. In this study, a large sample pool from six Portuguese limestones was tested to analyze the behavior of bending resistance, with sample thicknesses both above, and below the existing standard. Other physical and mechanical properties, together with petrographic compositions, were also evaluated, as previous works on the subject have demonstrated the need to comprehend their impact on the relationship between size effect and FS. Results show a tenuous inverse correlation between FS and sample thickness, with higher bending resistance in smaller samples, highlighting how measurements taken from thinner samples could result in an overestimation of FS, and the importance of physical and mechanical properties on the analysis of size effect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02635-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cladding thickness influence on flexural strength under concentrated load of limestones\",\"authors\":\"João Senra,&nbsp;Amélia Dionísio,&nbsp;Gustavo Paneiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1617/s11527-025-02635-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The modern trend towards thinner and lighter cladding panels has begun to challenge the validity of current test standards. The evaluation of mechanical resistance of natural stone panels, particularly through the determination of flexural strength (FS) via EN 12372 standard, is becoming inconsistent with modern application methods. This is due to the standard requirement for a minimum sample thickness of 25 mm, which is often thicker than the actual cladding panels, leading to producers being unable to comply with the existing standard. Additionally, the heterogeneous disposition and complex structure of natural stone make FS's relationship with sample size reduction non-compliant with known size effect statistical laws. In this study, a large sample pool from six Portuguese limestones was tested to analyze the behavior of bending resistance, with sample thicknesses both above, and below the existing standard. Other physical and mechanical properties, together with petrographic compositions, were also evaluated, as previous works on the subject have demonstrated the need to comprehend their impact on the relationship between size effect and FS. Results show a tenuous inverse correlation between FS and sample thickness, with higher bending resistance in smaller samples, highlighting how measurements taken from thinner samples could result in an overestimation of FS, and the importance of physical and mechanical properties on the analysis of size effect.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"58 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1617/s11527-025-02635-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02635-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02635-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代趋势向更薄、更轻的覆层板已经开始挑战当前测试标准的有效性。天然石材面板的机械阻力评估,特别是通过EN 12372标准测定挠曲强度(FS),与现代应用方法不一致。这是由于标准要求最小样品厚度为25毫米,这通常比实际覆层板厚,导致生产商无法遵守现有标准。此外,天然石材的异质性配置和复杂结构使得FS与样本量缩减的关系不符合已知的尺寸效应统计规律。在这项研究中,从六个葡萄牙石灰石中提取了一个大样本池,对样本厚度高于和低于现有标准的情况下进行了测试,以分析其抗弯曲性能。其他物理和机械性质,连同岩石成分,也被评估,因为以前的工作表明,需要了解它们对尺寸效应和FS之间关系的影响。结果显示,FS与样品厚度之间存在微弱的负相关关系,较小的样品具有更高的弯曲阻力,突出了从较薄的样品中进行的测量如何导致FS的高估,以及物理和机械性能对尺寸效应分析的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cladding thickness influence on flexural strength under concentrated load of limestones

The modern trend towards thinner and lighter cladding panels has begun to challenge the validity of current test standards. The evaluation of mechanical resistance of natural stone panels, particularly through the determination of flexural strength (FS) via EN 12372 standard, is becoming inconsistent with modern application methods. This is due to the standard requirement for a minimum sample thickness of 25 mm, which is often thicker than the actual cladding panels, leading to producers being unable to comply with the existing standard. Additionally, the heterogeneous disposition and complex structure of natural stone make FS's relationship with sample size reduction non-compliant with known size effect statistical laws. In this study, a large sample pool from six Portuguese limestones was tested to analyze the behavior of bending resistance, with sample thicknesses both above, and below the existing standard. Other physical and mechanical properties, together with petrographic compositions, were also evaluated, as previous works on the subject have demonstrated the need to comprehend their impact on the relationship between size effect and FS. Results show a tenuous inverse correlation between FS and sample thickness, with higher bending resistance in smaller samples, highlighting how measurements taken from thinner samples could result in an overestimation of FS, and the importance of physical and mechanical properties on the analysis of size effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信