森林恢复中的除草剂:选择性和适当剂量是影响卧赤藻管理的关键因素

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Fillipe Vieira de Araújo , Wander Gladson Amaral , Israel Marinho Pereira , José Barbosa dos Santos
{"title":"森林恢复中的除草剂:选择性和适当剂量是影响卧赤藻管理的关键因素","authors":"Fillipe Vieira de Araújo ,&nbsp;Wander Gladson Amaral ,&nbsp;Israel Marinho Pereira ,&nbsp;José Barbosa dos Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest restoration in the Atlantic Forest is challenged by the invasion of <em>Urochloa decumbens</em>, which suppresses native species and hinders ecosystem recovery. This study evaluated the selectivity and optimal doses of Glyphosate and Haloxyfop to enhance invasive control while minimizing impacts on native species. Ten native tree species were tested under four increasing doses of Glyphosate, ranging from 720 to 2880 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, and Haloxyfop, ranging from 30 to 90 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>. We assessed survival, growth, biomass allocation, and photosynthetic efficiency. Glyphosate suppressed <em>U. decumbens</em> by more than 90 % from 60 days after application. However, it severely affected native species, reducing survival to 60 %, biomass by up to 80 %, and photosynthetic efficiency to an Fv/Fm ratio of 0.05. Haloxyfop was more selective, maintaining 96 % survival and preserving biomass and photosynthesis, but its effectiveness in controlling <em>U. decumbens</em> declined from 67 % at 30 days to 13 % at 120 days. The optimal dose of Glyphosate for balancing invasive control and native species conservation was 171 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, which reduced <em>U. decumbens</em> cover by 55 % while limiting biomass loss to 11 %. For Haloxyfop, the optimal dose was 90 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, achieving maximum invasive control without affecting native species' biomass. Our findings demonstrate that integrating herbicide selectivity with optimized doses can effectively control invasive grasses while preserving native species, providing a valuable strategy for ecological restoration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbicides in forest restoration: Selectivity and adequate dose as key factors for the management of Urochloa decumbens\",\"authors\":\"Fillipe Vieira de Araújo ,&nbsp;Wander Gladson Amaral ,&nbsp;Israel Marinho Pereira ,&nbsp;José Barbosa dos Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forest restoration in the Atlantic Forest is challenged by the invasion of <em>Urochloa decumbens</em>, which suppresses native species and hinders ecosystem recovery. This study evaluated the selectivity and optimal doses of Glyphosate and Haloxyfop to enhance invasive control while minimizing impacts on native species. Ten native tree species were tested under four increasing doses of Glyphosate, ranging from 720 to 2880 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, and Haloxyfop, ranging from 30 to 90 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>. We assessed survival, growth, biomass allocation, and photosynthetic efficiency. Glyphosate suppressed <em>U. decumbens</em> by more than 90 % from 60 days after application. However, it severely affected native species, reducing survival to 60 %, biomass by up to 80 %, and photosynthetic efficiency to an Fv/Fm ratio of 0.05. Haloxyfop was more selective, maintaining 96 % survival and preserving biomass and photosynthesis, but its effectiveness in controlling <em>U. decumbens</em> declined from 67 % at 30 days to 13 % at 120 days. The optimal dose of Glyphosate for balancing invasive control and native species conservation was 171 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, which reduced <em>U. decumbens</em> cover by 55 % while limiting biomass loss to 11 %. For Haloxyfop, the optimal dose was 90 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, achieving maximum invasive control without affecting native species' biomass. Our findings demonstrate that integrating herbicide selectivity with optimized doses can effectively control invasive grasses while preserving native species, providing a valuable strategy for ecological restoration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001296\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大西洋森林的森林恢复面临着卧螺(Urochloa decumbens)入侵的挑战,它抑制了本地物种,阻碍了生态系统的恢复。本研究评估了草甘膦和氟氧磷的选择性和最佳剂量,以加强入侵控制,同时最大限度地减少对本地物种的影响。对10种本地树种进行了草甘膦(720至2880 g a.i. ha - 1)和氟草枯(30至90 g a.i. ha - 1)四种递增剂量的试验。我们评估了存活、生长、生物量分配和光合效率。草甘膦在施用后60天内抑制了90%以上的美国人。然而,它严重影响了本地物种,使其存活率降低到60%,生物量减少高达80%,光合效率降低到Fv/Fm比0.05。氟虫磷的选择性更强,维持了96%的存活率,并保持了生物量和光合作用,但其对木蠹蛾的防治效果从30 d的67%下降到120 d的13%。平衡入侵控制和本地物种保护的最佳草甘膦剂量为171 g a.i. ha - 1,可使美国躺倒覆盖减少55%,同时将生物量损失限制在11%。Haloxyfop的最佳剂量为90g a.i. ha - 1,在不影响本地物种生物量的情况下达到最大的入侵控制效果。研究结果表明,将除草剂选择性与最佳剂量相结合可以有效地控制入侵禾草,同时保护本地物种,为生态恢复提供了有价值的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Herbicides in forest restoration: Selectivity and adequate dose as key factors for the management of Urochloa decumbens
Forest restoration in the Atlantic Forest is challenged by the invasion of Urochloa decumbens, which suppresses native species and hinders ecosystem recovery. This study evaluated the selectivity and optimal doses of Glyphosate and Haloxyfop to enhance invasive control while minimizing impacts on native species. Ten native tree species were tested under four increasing doses of Glyphosate, ranging from 720 to 2880 g a.i. ha−1, and Haloxyfop, ranging from 30 to 90 g a.i. ha−1. We assessed survival, growth, biomass allocation, and photosynthetic efficiency. Glyphosate suppressed U. decumbens by more than 90 % from 60 days after application. However, it severely affected native species, reducing survival to 60 %, biomass by up to 80 %, and photosynthetic efficiency to an Fv/Fm ratio of 0.05. Haloxyfop was more selective, maintaining 96 % survival and preserving biomass and photosynthesis, but its effectiveness in controlling U. decumbens declined from 67 % at 30 days to 13 % at 120 days. The optimal dose of Glyphosate for balancing invasive control and native species conservation was 171 g a.i. ha−1, which reduced U. decumbens cover by 55 % while limiting biomass loss to 11 %. For Haloxyfop, the optimal dose was 90 g a.i. ha−1, achieving maximum invasive control without affecting native species' biomass. Our findings demonstrate that integrating herbicide selectivity with optimized doses can effectively control invasive grasses while preserving native species, providing a valuable strategy for ecological restoration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信