Fillipe Vieira de Araújo , Wander Gladson Amaral , Israel Marinho Pereira , José Barbosa dos Santos
{"title":"森林恢复中的除草剂:选择性和适当剂量是影响卧赤藻管理的关键因素","authors":"Fillipe Vieira de Araújo , Wander Gladson Amaral , Israel Marinho Pereira , José Barbosa dos Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest restoration in the Atlantic Forest is challenged by the invasion of <em>Urochloa decumbens</em>, which suppresses native species and hinders ecosystem recovery. This study evaluated the selectivity and optimal doses of Glyphosate and Haloxyfop to enhance invasive control while minimizing impacts on native species. Ten native tree species were tested under four increasing doses of Glyphosate, ranging from 720 to 2880 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, and Haloxyfop, ranging from 30 to 90 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>. We assessed survival, growth, biomass allocation, and photosynthetic efficiency. Glyphosate suppressed <em>U. decumbens</em> by more than 90 % from 60 days after application. However, it severely affected native species, reducing survival to 60 %, biomass by up to 80 %, and photosynthetic efficiency to an Fv/Fm ratio of 0.05. Haloxyfop was more selective, maintaining 96 % survival and preserving biomass and photosynthesis, but its effectiveness in controlling <em>U. decumbens</em> declined from 67 % at 30 days to 13 % at 120 days. The optimal dose of Glyphosate for balancing invasive control and native species conservation was 171 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, which reduced <em>U. decumbens</em> cover by 55 % while limiting biomass loss to 11 %. For Haloxyfop, the optimal dose was 90 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, achieving maximum invasive control without affecting native species' biomass. Our findings demonstrate that integrating herbicide selectivity with optimized doses can effectively control invasive grasses while preserving native species, providing a valuable strategy for ecological restoration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107641"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Herbicides in forest restoration: Selectivity and adequate dose as key factors for the management of Urochloa decumbens\",\"authors\":\"Fillipe Vieira de Araújo , Wander Gladson Amaral , Israel Marinho Pereira , José Barbosa dos Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forest restoration in the Atlantic Forest is challenged by the invasion of <em>Urochloa decumbens</em>, which suppresses native species and hinders ecosystem recovery. This study evaluated the selectivity and optimal doses of Glyphosate and Haloxyfop to enhance invasive control while minimizing impacts on native species. Ten native tree species were tested under four increasing doses of Glyphosate, ranging from 720 to 2880 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, and Haloxyfop, ranging from 30 to 90 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>. We assessed survival, growth, biomass allocation, and photosynthetic efficiency. Glyphosate suppressed <em>U. decumbens</em> by more than 90 % from 60 days after application. However, it severely affected native species, reducing survival to 60 %, biomass by up to 80 %, and photosynthetic efficiency to an Fv/Fm ratio of 0.05. Haloxyfop was more selective, maintaining 96 % survival and preserving biomass and photosynthesis, but its effectiveness in controlling <em>U. decumbens</em> declined from 67 % at 30 days to 13 % at 120 days. The optimal dose of Glyphosate for balancing invasive control and native species conservation was 171 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, which reduced <em>U. decumbens</em> cover by 55 % while limiting biomass loss to 11 %. For Haloxyfop, the optimal dose was 90 g a.i. ha<sup>−1</sup>, achieving maximum invasive control without affecting native species' biomass. Our findings demonstrate that integrating herbicide selectivity with optimized doses can effectively control invasive grasses while preserving native species, providing a valuable strategy for ecological restoration.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001296\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
大西洋森林的森林恢复面临着卧螺(Urochloa decumbens)入侵的挑战,它抑制了本地物种,阻碍了生态系统的恢复。本研究评估了草甘膦和氟氧磷的选择性和最佳剂量,以加强入侵控制,同时最大限度地减少对本地物种的影响。对10种本地树种进行了草甘膦(720至2880 g a.i. ha - 1)和氟草枯(30至90 g a.i. ha - 1)四种递增剂量的试验。我们评估了存活、生长、生物量分配和光合效率。草甘膦在施用后60天内抑制了90%以上的美国人。然而,它严重影响了本地物种,使其存活率降低到60%,生物量减少高达80%,光合效率降低到Fv/Fm比0.05。氟虫磷的选择性更强,维持了96%的存活率,并保持了生物量和光合作用,但其对木蠹蛾的防治效果从30 d的67%下降到120 d的13%。平衡入侵控制和本地物种保护的最佳草甘膦剂量为171 g a.i. ha - 1,可使美国躺倒覆盖减少55%,同时将生物量损失限制在11%。Haloxyfop的最佳剂量为90g a.i. ha - 1,在不影响本地物种生物量的情况下达到最大的入侵控制效果。研究结果表明,将除草剂选择性与最佳剂量相结合可以有效地控制入侵禾草,同时保护本地物种,为生态恢复提供了有价值的策略。
Herbicides in forest restoration: Selectivity and adequate dose as key factors for the management of Urochloa decumbens
Forest restoration in the Atlantic Forest is challenged by the invasion of Urochloa decumbens, which suppresses native species and hinders ecosystem recovery. This study evaluated the selectivity and optimal doses of Glyphosate and Haloxyfop to enhance invasive control while minimizing impacts on native species. Ten native tree species were tested under four increasing doses of Glyphosate, ranging from 720 to 2880 g a.i. ha−1, and Haloxyfop, ranging from 30 to 90 g a.i. ha−1. We assessed survival, growth, biomass allocation, and photosynthetic efficiency. Glyphosate suppressed U. decumbens by more than 90 % from 60 days after application. However, it severely affected native species, reducing survival to 60 %, biomass by up to 80 %, and photosynthetic efficiency to an Fv/Fm ratio of 0.05. Haloxyfop was more selective, maintaining 96 % survival and preserving biomass and photosynthesis, but its effectiveness in controlling U. decumbens declined from 67 % at 30 days to 13 % at 120 days. The optimal dose of Glyphosate for balancing invasive control and native species conservation was 171 g a.i. ha−1, which reduced U. decumbens cover by 55 % while limiting biomass loss to 11 %. For Haloxyfop, the optimal dose was 90 g a.i. ha−1, achieving maximum invasive control without affecting native species' biomass. Our findings demonstrate that integrating herbicide selectivity with optimized doses can effectively control invasive grasses while preserving native species, providing a valuable strategy for ecological restoration.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.