Haitao Liu , Yi Du , Yizhao Chen , Zhitao Huang , Junyuan Ji , Mengchun Gao , Yangguo Zhao , Chunji Jin
{"title":"固体碳源驱动的异养硝化和好氧反硝化去除海水养殖废水中的氮","authors":"Haitao Liu , Yi Du , Yizhao Chen , Zhitao Huang , Junyuan Ji , Mengchun Gao , Yangguo Zhao , Chunji Jin","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification (HNAD) enable the simultaneous removal of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N under aerobic conditions. This process is highly suitable for treating nitrogen-containing wastewater in oxygen-rich marine recirculating aquaculture system (MRAS). Natural cellulose materials, such as corncob (CC) and peanut shell (PS), are promising solid carbon sources (SCSs) for wastewater treatment. They are widely available, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly. This study developed an HNAD process using CC and PS as SCSs for MRAS wastewater treatment. The nitrogen removal performance and conversion pathways were investigated. CC and PS had dissolved organic yields of 0.44 g-COD/g-CC and 0.17 g-COD/g-PS, respectively. The HNAD process using CC demonstrated stable and efficient aerobic denitrification over a 6-day dosing cycle. Notably, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N and total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) removal efficiencies peaked at 99.71 % and 96.72 %, respectively. The NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N accumulation was negligible (< 0.3 mg/L). Compared to PS, CC showed more significant surface changes and higher microbial utilization. Its surface exhibited increased porosity, depressions, and greater microbial adhesion. NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N removal was driven by autotrophic nitrification, heterotrophic nitrification, and cell assimilation. Heterotrophic nitrification was the dominant pathway. NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N removal primarily occurred through heterotrophic denitrification. The efficiency of these processes depended heavily on the type of carbon source used. Microbial community analysis revealed that the coexistence of aerobic denitrifying bacteria and cellulose-degrading bacteria was critical for sustained denitrification efficiency. This study confirmed the underlying mechanisms of the HNAD denitrification process and provided a reference for its practical application in MRAS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 107697"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrogen removal via solid carbon source-driven heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification in marine aquaculture wastewater\",\"authors\":\"Haitao Liu , Yi Du , Yizhao Chen , Zhitao Huang , Junyuan Ji , Mengchun Gao , Yangguo Zhao , Chunji Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification (HNAD) enable the simultaneous removal of NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N under aerobic conditions. This process is highly suitable for treating nitrogen-containing wastewater in oxygen-rich marine recirculating aquaculture system (MRAS). Natural cellulose materials, such as corncob (CC) and peanut shell (PS), are promising solid carbon sources (SCSs) for wastewater treatment. They are widely available, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly. This study developed an HNAD process using CC and PS as SCSs for MRAS wastewater treatment. The nitrogen removal performance and conversion pathways were investigated. CC and PS had dissolved organic yields of 0.44 g-COD/g-CC and 0.17 g-COD/g-PS, respectively. The HNAD process using CC demonstrated stable and efficient aerobic denitrification over a 6-day dosing cycle. Notably, NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N and total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) removal efficiencies peaked at 99.71 % and 96.72 %, respectively. The NO<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>-N accumulation was negligible (< 0.3 mg/L). Compared to PS, CC showed more significant surface changes and higher microbial utilization. Its surface exhibited increased porosity, depressions, and greater microbial adhesion. NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N removal was driven by autotrophic nitrification, heterotrophic nitrification, and cell assimilation. Heterotrophic nitrification was the dominant pathway. NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N removal primarily occurred through heterotrophic denitrification. The efficiency of these processes depended heavily on the type of carbon source used. Microbial community analysis revealed that the coexistence of aerobic denitrifying bacteria and cellulose-degrading bacteria was critical for sustained denitrification efficiency. This study confirmed the underlying mechanisms of the HNAD denitrification process and provided a reference for its practical application in MRAS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of water process engineering\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of water process engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221471442500769X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221471442500769X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nitrogen removal via solid carbon source-driven heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification in marine aquaculture wastewater
Heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification (HNAD) enable the simultaneous removal of NH4+-N and NO3−-N under aerobic conditions. This process is highly suitable for treating nitrogen-containing wastewater in oxygen-rich marine recirculating aquaculture system (MRAS). Natural cellulose materials, such as corncob (CC) and peanut shell (PS), are promising solid carbon sources (SCSs) for wastewater treatment. They are widely available, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly. This study developed an HNAD process using CC and PS as SCSs for MRAS wastewater treatment. The nitrogen removal performance and conversion pathways were investigated. CC and PS had dissolved organic yields of 0.44 g-COD/g-CC and 0.17 g-COD/g-PS, respectively. The HNAD process using CC demonstrated stable and efficient aerobic denitrification over a 6-day dosing cycle. Notably, NO3−-N and total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) removal efficiencies peaked at 99.71 % and 96.72 %, respectively. The NO2−-N accumulation was negligible (< 0.3 mg/L). Compared to PS, CC showed more significant surface changes and higher microbial utilization. Its surface exhibited increased porosity, depressions, and greater microbial adhesion. NH4+-N removal was driven by autotrophic nitrification, heterotrophic nitrification, and cell assimilation. Heterotrophic nitrification was the dominant pathway. NO3−-N removal primarily occurred through heterotrophic denitrification. The efficiency of these processes depended heavily on the type of carbon source used. Microbial community analysis revealed that the coexistence of aerobic denitrifying bacteria and cellulose-degrading bacteria was critical for sustained denitrification efficiency. This study confirmed the underlying mechanisms of the HNAD denitrification process and provided a reference for its practical application in MRAS.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies