Arunava Putatunda, Christelle Al Haddad, Constantinos Antoniou
{"title":"对道路安全措施的社会经济评价方法进行全面审查","authors":"Arunava Putatunda, Christelle Al Haddad, Constantinos Antoniou","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Road safety measures, e.g., speed limits, are widely used globally to prevent and reduce the number of road crashes, injuries, and fatalities. However, implementing such preventive measures has long-term and complex social, environmental, and economic interdependencies and impacts. Therefore, socio-economic appraisals of road safety measures are crucial for identifying such complex interdependencies and impacts on the well-being of individuals, society, the economy, and the environment. The study carries out a comprehensive review of the scientific literature dealing with socio-economic appraisal methodologies of road safety measures. The study comprehensively reviewed the scientific literature on socio-economic appraisal methodologies for road safety interventions. The review follows PRISMA guidelines for selecting scientific articles across Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. From 535 records identified on 18 January 2025, 80 studies (including grey and peer-reviewed articles in English) were selected. These studies are reviewed based on six themes, namely: (a) methodological frameworks of the methodologies, (b) classification, (c) key indicators, (d) datasets, (e) strengths, limitations, and biases, (f) stakeholders’ involvement and impacts on policymaking. The review indicates that the existing socio-economic appraisal methodologies for road safety measures effectively capture specific dimensions, e.g., crash rate reduction, willingness-to-pay for road safety and improved social well-being. However, these methodologies also exhibit inconsistencies while accounting for factors like price inflation and replicability. The review identifies six methodological limitations that accentuate significant future research and innovation opportunities. The review also presents recommendations for future research to address the identified limitations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 108021"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive review of the socio-economic appraisal methodologies of the road safety measures\",\"authors\":\"Arunava Putatunda, Christelle Al Haddad, Constantinos Antoniou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Road safety measures, e.g., speed limits, are widely used globally to prevent and reduce the number of road crashes, injuries, and fatalities. However, implementing such preventive measures has long-term and complex social, environmental, and economic interdependencies and impacts. Therefore, socio-economic appraisals of road safety measures are crucial for identifying such complex interdependencies and impacts on the well-being of individuals, society, the economy, and the environment. The study carries out a comprehensive review of the scientific literature dealing with socio-economic appraisal methodologies of road safety measures. The study comprehensively reviewed the scientific literature on socio-economic appraisal methodologies for road safety interventions. The review follows PRISMA guidelines for selecting scientific articles across Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. From 535 records identified on 18 January 2025, 80 studies (including grey and peer-reviewed articles in English) were selected. These studies are reviewed based on six themes, namely: (a) methodological frameworks of the methodologies, (b) classification, (c) key indicators, (d) datasets, (e) strengths, limitations, and biases, (f) stakeholders’ involvement and impacts on policymaking. The review indicates that the existing socio-economic appraisal methodologies for road safety measures effectively capture specific dimensions, e.g., crash rate reduction, willingness-to-pay for road safety and improved social well-being. However, these methodologies also exhibit inconsistencies while accounting for factors like price inflation and replicability. The review identifies six methodological limitations that accentuate significant future research and innovation opportunities. The review also presents recommendations for future research to address the identified limitations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"217 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108021\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001071\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001071","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
全球广泛采用道路安全措施,例如限速,以预防和减少道路碰撞、伤害和死亡人数。然而,实施这种预防措施具有长期和复杂的社会、环境和经济相互依存关系和影响。因此,道路安全措施的社会经济评价对于确定这种复杂的相互依赖关系以及对个人、社会、经济和环境福祉的影响至关重要。这项研究对有关道路安全措施的社会经济评价方法的科学文献进行了全面审查。该研究全面审查了有关道路安全干预措施的社会经济评价方法的科学文献。该综述遵循PRISMA在b谷歌Scholar、Scopus和Web of Science上选择科学文章的指南。从2025年1月18日确定的535项记录中,选择了80项研究(包括灰色和同行评议的英文文章)。这些研究基于六个主题进行审查,即:(a)方法的方法框架,(b)分类,(c)关键指标,(d)数据集,(e)优势,局限性和偏见,(f)利益相关者的参与和对政策制定的影响。审查表明,现有道路安全措施的社会经济评价方法有效地涵盖了具体方面,例如减少撞车率、为道路安全付费的意愿和改善社会福利。然而,这些方法在考虑价格通胀和可复制性等因素时也表现出不一致性。这篇综述指出了六个方法学上的局限性,强调了未来重要的研究和创新机会。该综述还提出了对未来研究的建议,以解决已确定的局限性。
A comprehensive review of the socio-economic appraisal methodologies of the road safety measures
Road safety measures, e.g., speed limits, are widely used globally to prevent and reduce the number of road crashes, injuries, and fatalities. However, implementing such preventive measures has long-term and complex social, environmental, and economic interdependencies and impacts. Therefore, socio-economic appraisals of road safety measures are crucial for identifying such complex interdependencies and impacts on the well-being of individuals, society, the economy, and the environment. The study carries out a comprehensive review of the scientific literature dealing with socio-economic appraisal methodologies of road safety measures. The study comprehensively reviewed the scientific literature on socio-economic appraisal methodologies for road safety interventions. The review follows PRISMA guidelines for selecting scientific articles across Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. From 535 records identified on 18 January 2025, 80 studies (including grey and peer-reviewed articles in English) were selected. These studies are reviewed based on six themes, namely: (a) methodological frameworks of the methodologies, (b) classification, (c) key indicators, (d) datasets, (e) strengths, limitations, and biases, (f) stakeholders’ involvement and impacts on policymaking. The review indicates that the existing socio-economic appraisal methodologies for road safety measures effectively capture specific dimensions, e.g., crash rate reduction, willingness-to-pay for road safety and improved social well-being. However, these methodologies also exhibit inconsistencies while accounting for factors like price inflation and replicability. The review identifies six methodological limitations that accentuate significant future research and innovation opportunities. The review also presents recommendations for future research to address the identified limitations.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.