叶片渗透势的样本量是否显著影响其与棉花产量相关的证据?

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Xuejun Dong , Dale A. Mott , Quan Zhou , Benjamin M. McKnight
{"title":"叶片渗透势的样本量是否显著影响其与棉花产量相关的证据?","authors":"Xuejun Dong ,&nbsp;Dale A. Mott ,&nbsp;Quan Zhou ,&nbsp;Benjamin M. McKnight","doi":"10.1016/j.jaridenv.2025.105387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (<em>π</em><sub>0</sub>) has been used frequently to indicate turgor loss point of plant leaves. However, even a rapid measurement of <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> using osmometry is time-consuming, if numerous leaf samples need to be measured. Because of this, researchers tend to use a small sample size to determine <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> and relate it to indices of crop performance. Yet the statistical and agronomic significance of using a small sample size of <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> to indicate crop performance is not known. We address this question using field measurements and statistical resampling. Six mature leaf samples were collected at the peak bloom stage from each of the 54 cotton plots in Texas, USA in 2024. The <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> of the collected leaves were measured using an osmometer. Seed cotton yields from the field plots were measured near the end of cotton season. To test the effect of sample size on the evidence of the association between <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> and cotton yield, 1–6 resamples of <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> were randomly drawn with replacement from the original 6 measurements per plot for the 54 plots. The resampled data of <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> were then used as independent variable to predict cotton yield. We found that, considering the labor and cost, sampling 3 leaves per plot would be adequate for the linear regression between <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> and cotton yield.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arid Environments","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 105387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does sample size of leaf osmotic potential significantly affect the evidence of its association with cotton yield?\",\"authors\":\"Xuejun Dong ,&nbsp;Dale A. Mott ,&nbsp;Quan Zhou ,&nbsp;Benjamin M. McKnight\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaridenv.2025.105387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (<em>π</em><sub>0</sub>) has been used frequently to indicate turgor loss point of plant leaves. However, even a rapid measurement of <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> using osmometry is time-consuming, if numerous leaf samples need to be measured. Because of this, researchers tend to use a small sample size to determine <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> and relate it to indices of crop performance. Yet the statistical and agronomic significance of using a small sample size of <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> to indicate crop performance is not known. We address this question using field measurements and statistical resampling. Six mature leaf samples were collected at the peak bloom stage from each of the 54 cotton plots in Texas, USA in 2024. The <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> of the collected leaves were measured using an osmometer. Seed cotton yields from the field plots were measured near the end of cotton season. To test the effect of sample size on the evidence of the association between <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> and cotton yield, 1–6 resamples of <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> were randomly drawn with replacement from the original 6 measurements per plot for the 54 plots. The resampled data of <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> were then used as independent variable to predict cotton yield. We found that, considering the labor and cost, sampling 3 leaves per plot would be adequate for the linear regression between <em>π</em><sub>0</sub> and cotton yield.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arid Environments\",\"volume\":\"229 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arid Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196325000710\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arid Environments","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140196325000710","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物叶片满胀时的渗透势(π0)常被用来表示叶片的胀失点。然而,如果需要测量大量的叶片样品,即使使用渗透法快速测量π0也是费时的。正因为如此,研究人员倾向于使用小样本量来确定π0并将其与作物性能指标联系起来。然而,使用π0的小样本量来表示作物性能的统计和农艺意义尚不清楚。我们使用现场测量和统计重采样来解决这个问题。研究了2024年在美国德克萨斯州的54块棉花地中,每一块在棉花盛花期采集6个成熟叶片样本。用渗透计测定所采叶片的π值。在棉花季节结束时测量了田间小块的籽棉产量。为了检验样本量对π0与棉花产量相关性证据的影响,在54块土地上,每块土地随机抽取1 ~ 6个π0样本,替换原来6个测量值。再以π0作为自变量预测棉花产量。我们发现,考虑到人工和成本,每块取样3片叶片就可以满足π0与棉花产量的线性回归。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does sample size of leaf osmotic potential significantly affect the evidence of its association with cotton yield?
Leaf osmotic potential at full turgor (π0) has been used frequently to indicate turgor loss point of plant leaves. However, even a rapid measurement of π0 using osmometry is time-consuming, if numerous leaf samples need to be measured. Because of this, researchers tend to use a small sample size to determine π0 and relate it to indices of crop performance. Yet the statistical and agronomic significance of using a small sample size of π0 to indicate crop performance is not known. We address this question using field measurements and statistical resampling. Six mature leaf samples were collected at the peak bloom stage from each of the 54 cotton plots in Texas, USA in 2024. The π0 of the collected leaves were measured using an osmometer. Seed cotton yields from the field plots were measured near the end of cotton season. To test the effect of sample size on the evidence of the association between π0 and cotton yield, 1–6 resamples of π0 were randomly drawn with replacement from the original 6 measurements per plot for the 54 plots. The resampled data of π0 were then used as independent variable to predict cotton yield. We found that, considering the labor and cost, sampling 3 leaves per plot would be adequate for the linear regression between π0 and cotton yield.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arid Environments
Journal of Arid Environments 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
144
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arid Environments is an international journal publishing original scientific and technical research articles on physical, biological and cultural aspects of arid, semi-arid, and desert environments. As a forum of multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary dialogue it addresses research on all aspects of arid environments and their past, present and future use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信