碳-凯夫拉整体及纱间混杂复合材料钻孔性能的实验研究

IF 12.7 1区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shashi Ranjan Pathak, Anup Malik, Harlal Singh Mali
{"title":"碳-凯夫拉整体及纱间混杂复合材料钻孔性能的实验研究","authors":"Shashi Ranjan Pathak,&nbsp;Anup Malik,&nbsp;Harlal Singh Mali","doi":"10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon-Kevlar interyarn hybrid composites are sufficiently stiff and tough, which makes them useful in various sectors. Despite these potentials, their drilling behavior has not yet been explored. Drilling composite materials generates defects due to the distinct properties of the fiber and matrix. This study explores the drilling behavior of carbon-Kevlar monolithic and interyarn hybrid thermoplastic composite by changing tool geometries, feed rates, and spindle speeds. The chip morphology, drilling temperature, thrust force, delamination factor, and hole wall surface were analyzed. Three types of composite laminates (monolithic carbon, monolithic Kevlar, and carbon-Kevlar interyarn hybrid composites) were fabricated. Holes were made by two different geometries (conventional twist drill and brad spur drill) at varying feed rates (15, 30, and 45 mm/min) and spindle speeds (1000, 2000, and 3000 rpm). Compared with the conventional twist drill, the brad spur drill produced a 32.40 % reduction in maximum drilling temperature, 29.73 % less thrust force, and 13.57 % less delamination factor for the carbon-Kevlar hybrid composite. Based on the microstructural analysis, the brad spur drill produces a better surface with lesser fiber fracture, delamination, cavity, and matrix smearing than the conventional twist drill for all three composites.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10660,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part B: Engineering","volume":"301 ","pages":"Article 112499"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Investigation on drilling behavior of carbon-Kevlar monolithic and interyarn hybrid composite\",\"authors\":\"Shashi Ranjan Pathak,&nbsp;Anup Malik,&nbsp;Harlal Singh Mali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Carbon-Kevlar interyarn hybrid composites are sufficiently stiff and tough, which makes them useful in various sectors. Despite these potentials, their drilling behavior has not yet been explored. Drilling composite materials generates defects due to the distinct properties of the fiber and matrix. This study explores the drilling behavior of carbon-Kevlar monolithic and interyarn hybrid thermoplastic composite by changing tool geometries, feed rates, and spindle speeds. The chip morphology, drilling temperature, thrust force, delamination factor, and hole wall surface were analyzed. Three types of composite laminates (monolithic carbon, monolithic Kevlar, and carbon-Kevlar interyarn hybrid composites) were fabricated. Holes were made by two different geometries (conventional twist drill and brad spur drill) at varying feed rates (15, 30, and 45 mm/min) and spindle speeds (1000, 2000, and 3000 rpm). Compared with the conventional twist drill, the brad spur drill produced a 32.40 % reduction in maximum drilling temperature, 29.73 % less thrust force, and 13.57 % less delamination factor for the carbon-Kevlar hybrid composite. Based on the microstructural analysis, the brad spur drill produces a better surface with lesser fiber fracture, delamination, cavity, and matrix smearing than the conventional twist drill for all three composites.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Composites Part B: Engineering\",\"volume\":\"301 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Composites Part B: Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836825004007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part B: Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836825004007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳-凯夫拉纤维纱线间混合复合材料具有足够的刚性和韧性,这使得它们在各个领域都很有用。尽管具有这些潜力,但它们的钻井行为尚未得到探索。钻孔复合材料由于纤维和基体的特性不同而产生缺陷。本研究通过改变刀具几何形状、进给速度和主轴速度,探索了碳-凯夫拉整体和纱线间混合热塑性复合材料的钻孔行为。分析了切屑形貌、钻进温度、推力、分层系数和孔壁表面。制备了三种类型的复合层压板(整体碳、整体凯夫拉和碳-凯夫拉纱间混杂复合材料)。在不同的进给速度(15、30和45 mm/min)和主轴转速(1000、2000和3000 rpm)下,用两种不同的几何形状(传统麻花钻和brad正钻)钻出孔。与传统麻花钻相比,布拉德直钻的最大钻进温度降低了32.40%,推力降低了29.73%,碳-凯夫拉复合材料的分层系数降低了13.57%。根据微观结构分析,对于这三种复合材料,与传统麻花钻相比,brad直钻的表面效果更好,纤维断裂、分层、空腔和基体涂抹更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental Investigation on drilling behavior of carbon-Kevlar monolithic and interyarn hybrid composite
Carbon-Kevlar interyarn hybrid composites are sufficiently stiff and tough, which makes them useful in various sectors. Despite these potentials, their drilling behavior has not yet been explored. Drilling composite materials generates defects due to the distinct properties of the fiber and matrix. This study explores the drilling behavior of carbon-Kevlar monolithic and interyarn hybrid thermoplastic composite by changing tool geometries, feed rates, and spindle speeds. The chip morphology, drilling temperature, thrust force, delamination factor, and hole wall surface were analyzed. Three types of composite laminates (monolithic carbon, monolithic Kevlar, and carbon-Kevlar interyarn hybrid composites) were fabricated. Holes were made by two different geometries (conventional twist drill and brad spur drill) at varying feed rates (15, 30, and 45 mm/min) and spindle speeds (1000, 2000, and 3000 rpm). Compared with the conventional twist drill, the brad spur drill produced a 32.40 % reduction in maximum drilling temperature, 29.73 % less thrust force, and 13.57 % less delamination factor for the carbon-Kevlar hybrid composite. Based on the microstructural analysis, the brad spur drill produces a better surface with lesser fiber fracture, delamination, cavity, and matrix smearing than the conventional twist drill for all three composites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part B: Engineering
Composites Part B: Engineering 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
24.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
784
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Composites Part B: Engineering is a journal that publishes impactful research of high quality on composite materials. This research is supported by fundamental mechanics and materials science and engineering approaches. The targeted research can cover a wide range of length scales, ranging from nano to micro and meso, and even to the full product and structure level. The journal specifically focuses on engineering applications that involve high performance composites. These applications can range from low volume and high cost to high volume and low cost composite development. The main goal of the journal is to provide a platform for the prompt publication of original and high quality research. The emphasis is on design, development, modeling, validation, and manufacturing of engineering details and concepts. The journal welcomes both basic research papers and proposals for review articles. Authors are encouraged to address challenges across various application areas. These areas include, but are not limited to, aerospace, automotive, and other surface transportation. The journal also covers energy-related applications, with a focus on renewable energy. Other application areas include infrastructure, off-shore and maritime projects, health care technology, and recreational products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信