{"title":"人类双目视觉的发展:电生理学的视角","authors":"Anthony M. Norcia","doi":"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vision with two eyes confers evolutionary advantages in terms of field of view, binocular summation and the sense of depth from disparity and motion. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the development of binocular vision through the lens of Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs). The review begins with early studies of binocular summation that compared monocular to binocular VEP amplitude ratios. This is followed by a description of more definitive indices of binocular interaction afforded by studies of dichoptic masking and intermodulation. We then describe a striking immaturity of binocular motion processing – the developmental motion asymmetry – a monocular nasalward/temporalward asymmetry of motion processing that reflects the child’s developmental history of normal binocular interaction. We end with a review of the development of sensitivity to the primary cue for depth – horizontal retinal disparity. Together, the available results paint a picture of early competency in some respects, combined with both quantitative and important qualitative differences from the adult that suggest the presence of distinct processing mechanisms with different developmental sequences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23670,"journal":{"name":"Vision Research","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 108593"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of human binocular vision: An electrophysiological perspective\",\"authors\":\"Anthony M. Norcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.visres.2025.108593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Vision with two eyes confers evolutionary advantages in terms of field of view, binocular summation and the sense of depth from disparity and motion. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the development of binocular vision through the lens of Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs). The review begins with early studies of binocular summation that compared monocular to binocular VEP amplitude ratios. This is followed by a description of more definitive indices of binocular interaction afforded by studies of dichoptic masking and intermodulation. We then describe a striking immaturity of binocular motion processing – the developmental motion asymmetry – a monocular nasalward/temporalward asymmetry of motion processing that reflects the child’s developmental history of normal binocular interaction. We end with a review of the development of sensitivity to the primary cue for depth – horizontal retinal disparity. Together, the available results paint a picture of early competency in some respects, combined with both quantitative and important qualitative differences from the adult that suggest the presence of distinct processing mechanisms with different developmental sequences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"231 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108593\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698925000549\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698925000549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of human binocular vision: An electrophysiological perspective
Vision with two eyes confers evolutionary advantages in terms of field of view, binocular summation and the sense of depth from disparity and motion. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the development of binocular vision through the lens of Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs). The review begins with early studies of binocular summation that compared monocular to binocular VEP amplitude ratios. This is followed by a description of more definitive indices of binocular interaction afforded by studies of dichoptic masking and intermodulation. We then describe a striking immaturity of binocular motion processing – the developmental motion asymmetry – a monocular nasalward/temporalward asymmetry of motion processing that reflects the child’s developmental history of normal binocular interaction. We end with a review of the development of sensitivity to the primary cue for depth – horizontal retinal disparity. Together, the available results paint a picture of early competency in some respects, combined with both quantitative and important qualitative differences from the adult that suggest the presence of distinct processing mechanisms with different developmental sequences.
期刊介绍:
Vision Research is a journal devoted to the functional aspects of human, vertebrate and invertebrate vision and publishes experimental and observational studies, reviews, and theoretical and computational analyses. Vision Research also publishes clinical studies relevant to normal visual function and basic research relevant to visual dysfunction or its clinical investigation. Functional aspects of vision is interpreted broadly, ranging from molecular and cellular function to perception and behavior. Detailed descriptions are encouraged but enough introductory background should be included for non-specialists. Theoretical and computational papers should give a sense of order to the facts or point to new verifiable observations. Papers dealing with questions in the history of vision science should stress the development of ideas in the field.