省际边界对中国资本流动的影响:基于企业跨地区投资数据的研究

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Yang Yang , Shengnan Wu , Xueliang Zhang , Lili Hao
{"title":"省际边界对中国资本流动的影响:基于企业跨地区投资数据的研究","authors":"Yang Yang ,&nbsp;Shengnan Wu ,&nbsp;Xueliang Zhang ,&nbsp;Lili Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The extant literature primarily focuses on the border effects of commodity markets, while research on the border effects of capital markets remains limited. This article employs enterprise cross-regional investment data to quantify provincial border effects in terms of capital flow in China. The findings demonstrate the presence of substantial provincial border effects in China's cross-regional investment, with these effects exhibiting an increasing trend over time. Analysis of influencing factors reveals that fiscal decentralization and political tournaments have spurred the emergence of local protectionism and administrative regional economies, serving as significant institutional causes for provincial border effects in China. The development of transportation and the construction of urban agglomerations are conducive to reducing border effects, yet disparities in regional development levels and industrial structures continuously reinforce border effects. This phenomenon elucidates why the border effects are even stronger in the economically developed but internally uneven eastern regions. Additionally, fixed-effects decomposition results indicate that strong border effects are concentrated between adjacent provinces; this is characteristic of a “beggar-thy-neighbour” approach. Evidence from China suggests that ways to break administrative barriers hindering the free flow of capital elements can be explored through policy measures in areas such as transportation connectivity and institutional innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105984"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provincial border effects on capital flows in China: A study based on enterprise cross-regional investment data\",\"authors\":\"Yang Yang ,&nbsp;Shengnan Wu ,&nbsp;Xueliang Zhang ,&nbsp;Lili Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The extant literature primarily focuses on the border effects of commodity markets, while research on the border effects of capital markets remains limited. This article employs enterprise cross-regional investment data to quantify provincial border effects in terms of capital flow in China. The findings demonstrate the presence of substantial provincial border effects in China's cross-regional investment, with these effects exhibiting an increasing trend over time. Analysis of influencing factors reveals that fiscal decentralization and political tournaments have spurred the emergence of local protectionism and administrative regional economies, serving as significant institutional causes for provincial border effects in China. The development of transportation and the construction of urban agglomerations are conducive to reducing border effects, yet disparities in regional development levels and industrial structures continuously reinforce border effects. This phenomenon elucidates why the border effects are even stronger in the economically developed but internally uneven eastern regions. Additionally, fixed-effects decomposition results indicate that strong border effects are concentrated between adjacent provinces; this is characteristic of a “beggar-thy-neighbour” approach. Evidence from China suggests that ways to break administrative barriers hindering the free flow of capital elements can be explored through policy measures in areas such as transportation connectivity and institutional innovation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125002847\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125002847","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有文献主要关注商品市场的边界效应,而对资本市场边界效应的研究仍然有限。本文利用企业跨区域投资数据,量化中国资本流动的省际效应。研究结果表明,中国跨区域投资存在显著的省际效应,且随着时间的推移,省际效应呈增加趋势。影响因素分析表明,财政分权和政治竞争刺激了地方保护主义和行政区域经济的出现,是中国省际边界效应的重要制度原因。交通运输的发展和城市群的建设有利于降低边界效应,但区域发展水平和产业结构的差异不断强化边界效应。这一现象说明了为什么边界效应在经济发达但内部不平衡的东部地区更为强烈。固定效应分解结果表明,强边界效应集中在相邻省份之间;这是一种“以邻为壑”的做法。来自中国的证据表明,可以通过交通互联互通和制度创新等领域的政策措施,探索打破阻碍资本要素自由流动的行政壁垒的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provincial border effects on capital flows in China: A study based on enterprise cross-regional investment data
The extant literature primarily focuses on the border effects of commodity markets, while research on the border effects of capital markets remains limited. This article employs enterprise cross-regional investment data to quantify provincial border effects in terms of capital flow in China. The findings demonstrate the presence of substantial provincial border effects in China's cross-regional investment, with these effects exhibiting an increasing trend over time. Analysis of influencing factors reveals that fiscal decentralization and political tournaments have spurred the emergence of local protectionism and administrative regional economies, serving as significant institutional causes for provincial border effects in China. The development of transportation and the construction of urban agglomerations are conducive to reducing border effects, yet disparities in regional development levels and industrial structures continuously reinforce border effects. This phenomenon elucidates why the border effects are even stronger in the economically developed but internally uneven eastern regions. Additionally, fixed-effects decomposition results indicate that strong border effects are concentrated between adjacent provinces; this is characteristic of a “beggar-thy-neighbour” approach. Evidence from China suggests that ways to break administrative barriers hindering the free flow of capital elements can be explored through policy measures in areas such as transportation connectivity and institutional innovation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信