关于机构能力有限情况下的参与式城市规划:对坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆 Kigamboni 详细框架和 2019-2039 准则的分析

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Johan Mottelson , Stina Møldrup Wolff
{"title":"关于机构能力有限情况下的参与式城市规划:对坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆 Kigamboni 详细框架和 2019-2039 准则的分析","authors":"Johan Mottelson ,&nbsp;Stina Møldrup Wolff","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent scholarly works discuss the potential of participatory urban planning for addressing limitations of top-down master planning in mitigating unregulated urban development in East Africa. However, urban design developed through participatory mechanisms in this context remains understudied. This paper analyzes a recent participatory urban planning project in Kigamboni municipality, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, using qualitative visual analysis of the plans. Notably, the plans rely heavily on land use zoning and detailed regulation of the built environment. However, as the local authorities have previously faced challenges with enforcement of such regulations, these instruments will likely continue to have limited impact. In addition, the plans include large-scale strategic planning components such as an international port and major industrial areas in the most remote and least developed part of the city, that require considerable investments. However, our analysis suggests that these components lack the institutional and economic framework to enable implementation and enforcement. Accordingly, the plans resemble regional examples of top-down approaches to master planning, by projecting urban ideals that are inconsistent with the institutional, technical, and economic capacity required for effective implementation and enforcement. We recommend that participatory strategic regional planning in East Africa includes central level institutional integration to verify viability and investment commitment, while local level planning should emphasize layout of mobility systems and plots in line with the realities on the ground, as such approaches hold more potential for effective implementation and long-term impact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 105995"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On participatory urban planning in contexts of limited institutional capacity: An analysis of Kigamboni detailed framework and guideline 2019–2039 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Johan Mottelson ,&nbsp;Stina Møldrup Wolff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.105995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recent scholarly works discuss the potential of participatory urban planning for addressing limitations of top-down master planning in mitigating unregulated urban development in East Africa. However, urban design developed through participatory mechanisms in this context remains understudied. This paper analyzes a recent participatory urban planning project in Kigamboni municipality, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, using qualitative visual analysis of the plans. Notably, the plans rely heavily on land use zoning and detailed regulation of the built environment. However, as the local authorities have previously faced challenges with enforcement of such regulations, these instruments will likely continue to have limited impact. In addition, the plans include large-scale strategic planning components such as an international port and major industrial areas in the most remote and least developed part of the city, that require considerable investments. However, our analysis suggests that these components lack the institutional and economic framework to enable implementation and enforcement. Accordingly, the plans resemble regional examples of top-down approaches to master planning, by projecting urban ideals that are inconsistent with the institutional, technical, and economic capacity required for effective implementation and enforcement. We recommend that participatory strategic regional planning in East Africa includes central level institutional integration to verify viability and investment commitment, while local level planning should emphasize layout of mobility systems and plots in line with the realities on the ground, as such approaches hold more potential for effective implementation and long-term impact.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125002951\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125002951","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的学术著作讨论了参与式城市规划的潜力,以解决自上而下的总体规划在缓解东非不受管制的城市发展方面的局限性。然而,在这种背景下,通过参与式机制开发的城市设计仍未得到充分研究。本文分析了坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆基甘博尼市最近的一个参与式城市规划项目,采用了对规划的定性视觉分析。值得注意的是,这些规划严重依赖土地使用分区和对建筑环境的详细监管。然而,由于地方当局以前在执行这些法规方面面临挑战,这些工具可能会继续产生有限的影响。此外,这些计划还包括大规模的战略规划组成部分,例如一个国际港口和城市最偏远和最不发达地区的主要工业区,这些都需要大量投资。然而,我们的分析表明,这些组成部分缺乏能够实施和执行的体制和经济框架。因此,这些规划类似于自上而下总体规划方法的区域范例,通过规划与有效实施和执行所需的体制、技术和经济能力不一致的城市理想。我们建议东非的参与性战略区域规划包括中央层面的机构整合,以验证可行性和投资承诺,而地方层面的规划应强调根据实际情况布局交通系统和地块,因为这种方法具有更大的有效实施和长期影响的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On participatory urban planning in contexts of limited institutional capacity: An analysis of Kigamboni detailed framework and guideline 2019–2039 in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Recent scholarly works discuss the potential of participatory urban planning for addressing limitations of top-down master planning in mitigating unregulated urban development in East Africa. However, urban design developed through participatory mechanisms in this context remains understudied. This paper analyzes a recent participatory urban planning project in Kigamboni municipality, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, using qualitative visual analysis of the plans. Notably, the plans rely heavily on land use zoning and detailed regulation of the built environment. However, as the local authorities have previously faced challenges with enforcement of such regulations, these instruments will likely continue to have limited impact. In addition, the plans include large-scale strategic planning components such as an international port and major industrial areas in the most remote and least developed part of the city, that require considerable investments. However, our analysis suggests that these components lack the institutional and economic framework to enable implementation and enforcement. Accordingly, the plans resemble regional examples of top-down approaches to master planning, by projecting urban ideals that are inconsistent with the institutional, technical, and economic capacity required for effective implementation and enforcement. We recommend that participatory strategic regional planning in East Africa includes central level institutional integration to verify viability and investment commitment, while local level planning should emphasize layout of mobility systems and plots in line with the realities on the ground, as such approaches hold more potential for effective implementation and long-term impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信