爱荷华州饮用水源中的 PFAS:化学和地理空间模式

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Daria Dilparic , Matthew Graesch , Claire Hruby , Joseph A. Charbonnet
{"title":"爱荷华州饮用水源中的 PFAS:化学和地理空间模式","authors":"Daria Dilparic ,&nbsp;Matthew Graesch ,&nbsp;Claire Hruby ,&nbsp;Joseph A. Charbonnet","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Per</em>- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are toxic, persistent, and ubiquitous contaminants which are harmful to the environment and human health. We analyzed publicly accessible records of PFAS concentrations in surface water and groundwater used for public drinking water supplies across the state of Iowa, along with groundwater from private wells near suspected contamination sources. We analyzed these data using the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test, principal component analysis, analysis of variance, and Tukey's honestly significant difference test to identify contamination patterns at the regional and local scale. Results indicate that surface water sources across the state are much more likely to contain PFAS than groundwater sources (i.e., 94 % vs. 30 %), but among contaminated public water sources, groundwater has a higher average total PFAS concentration than surface water (i.e., 43.9 ng/L vs. 9.8 ng/L). Two short-chain PFAS (PFBA and PFPeA) dominate surface water sources across the state apart from the Mississippi River, which contains elevated concentrations of PFOS and PFOA. The Mississippi River also influences groundwater within the breadth of its floodplain and associated alluvial aquifer; most groundwater under the influence of the Mississippi River has a similar PFAS fingerprint to the river itself and contains greater concentrations of PFBA than is typical of contaminated groundwaters located outside the influence of the river. Case studies from public and private wells in four PFAS-impacted communities further illustrate that despite regional-scale patterns, PFAS contamination of non-alluvial groundwater often reflects highly local point sources, including firefighting activities and fluorochemical manufacturing, storage, or use. These results demonstrate the utility of regional analyses for characterizing PFAS threats to water supplies and contextualizing local PFAS data in spite of complex source mixtures and fate and transport behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"977 ","pages":"Article 179397"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PFAS in Iowa drinking water sources: Chemical and geospatial patterns\",\"authors\":\"Daria Dilparic ,&nbsp;Matthew Graesch ,&nbsp;Claire Hruby ,&nbsp;Joseph A. Charbonnet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Per</em>- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are toxic, persistent, and ubiquitous contaminants which are harmful to the environment and human health. We analyzed publicly accessible records of PFAS concentrations in surface water and groundwater used for public drinking water supplies across the state of Iowa, along with groundwater from private wells near suspected contamination sources. We analyzed these data using the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test, principal component analysis, analysis of variance, and Tukey's honestly significant difference test to identify contamination patterns at the regional and local scale. Results indicate that surface water sources across the state are much more likely to contain PFAS than groundwater sources (i.e., 94 % vs. 30 %), but among contaminated public water sources, groundwater has a higher average total PFAS concentration than surface water (i.e., 43.9 ng/L vs. 9.8 ng/L). Two short-chain PFAS (PFBA and PFPeA) dominate surface water sources across the state apart from the Mississippi River, which contains elevated concentrations of PFOS and PFOA. The Mississippi River also influences groundwater within the breadth of its floodplain and associated alluvial aquifer; most groundwater under the influence of the Mississippi River has a similar PFAS fingerprint to the river itself and contains greater concentrations of PFBA than is typical of contaminated groundwaters located outside the influence of the river. Case studies from public and private wells in four PFAS-impacted communities further illustrate that despite regional-scale patterns, PFAS contamination of non-alluvial groundwater often reflects highly local point sources, including firefighting activities and fluorochemical manufacturing, storage, or use. These results demonstrate the utility of regional analyses for characterizing PFAS threats to water supplies and contextualizing local PFAS data in spite of complex source mixtures and fate and transport behavior.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\"977 \",\"pages\":\"Article 179397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725010344\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725010344","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是有毒的、持久性的、普遍存在的污染物,对环境和人类健康有害。我们分析了爱荷华州用于公共饮用水的地表水和地下水中PFAS浓度的公开记录,以及疑似污染源附近私人水井的地下水。我们使用Mann-Whitney U检验、主成分分析、方差分析和Tukey的诚实显著差异检验来分析这些数据,以确定区域和地方尺度上的污染模式。结果表明,全州地表水比地下水更容易含有PFAS(即94%比30%),但在受污染的公共水源中,地下水的平均总PFAS浓度高于地表水(即43.9 ng/L比9.8 ng/L)。两种短链PFAS (PFBA和PFPeA)主导着整个州的地表水源,除了密西西比河,其中含有高浓度的全氟辛烷磺酸和全氟辛烷磺酸。密西西比河也影响着洪泛区和相关冲积含水层范围内的地下水;受密西西比河影响的大多数地下水具有与河流本身相似的PFAS指纹,并且含有比不受河流影响的典型受污染地下水更高的PFBA浓度。对四个受氟化烃影响社区的公共和私人水井进行的案例研究进一步表明,尽管存在区域尺度的模式,但氟化烃对非冲积地下水的污染往往反映出高度地方性的点源,包括消防活动和氟化学品的制造、储存或使用。这些结果表明,尽管存在复杂的来源混合、命运和运输行为,但区域分析在表征PFAS对供水的威胁和将当地PFAS数据纳入背景方面是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

PFAS in Iowa drinking water sources: Chemical and geospatial patterns

PFAS in Iowa drinking water sources: Chemical and geospatial patterns
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are toxic, persistent, and ubiquitous contaminants which are harmful to the environment and human health. We analyzed publicly accessible records of PFAS concentrations in surface water and groundwater used for public drinking water supplies across the state of Iowa, along with groundwater from private wells near suspected contamination sources. We analyzed these data using the Mann-Whitney U test, principal component analysis, analysis of variance, and Tukey's honestly significant difference test to identify contamination patterns at the regional and local scale. Results indicate that surface water sources across the state are much more likely to contain PFAS than groundwater sources (i.e., 94 % vs. 30 %), but among contaminated public water sources, groundwater has a higher average total PFAS concentration than surface water (i.e., 43.9 ng/L vs. 9.8 ng/L). Two short-chain PFAS (PFBA and PFPeA) dominate surface water sources across the state apart from the Mississippi River, which contains elevated concentrations of PFOS and PFOA. The Mississippi River also influences groundwater within the breadth of its floodplain and associated alluvial aquifer; most groundwater under the influence of the Mississippi River has a similar PFAS fingerprint to the river itself and contains greater concentrations of PFBA than is typical of contaminated groundwaters located outside the influence of the river. Case studies from public and private wells in four PFAS-impacted communities further illustrate that despite regional-scale patterns, PFAS contamination of non-alluvial groundwater often reflects highly local point sources, including firefighting activities and fluorochemical manufacturing, storage, or use. These results demonstrate the utility of regional analyses for characterizing PFAS threats to water supplies and contextualizing local PFAS data in spite of complex source mixtures and fate and transport behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信