Huda Ismail, Almahi I. Mohamed, Nontokozo Z. Msomi, Md. Shahidul Islam
{"title":"某些人工甜味剂的抗糖尿病和抗肥胖潜力及其对铁诱导的肝脏氧化应激的调节作用","authors":"Huda Ismail, Almahi I. Mohamed, Nontokozo Z. Msomi, Md. Shahidul Islam","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The excessive consumption of simple carbohydrates, such as sucrose and fructose, has been identified as one of the most significant risk factors contributing to the development of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Consequently, the use of artificial sweeteners (AS) as sugar alternatives has surged. Present study was intended to examine the antioxidant, anti-obesogenic, and anti-diabetic potential of commonly used AS, namely saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, and acesulfame potassium, using <em>in vitro, ex vivo,</em> and <em>in silico</em> experimental models. The <em>in vitro</em> antioxidant activity was determined using the DPPH, NO, and OH<sup>•</sup> radical scavenging activities. The effects of the sweeteners on α-amylase, α-glucosidase, pancreatic lipase inhibitions, and glucose uptake using yeast cells were also evaluated. Computational molecular docking was further conducted to examine their mode of enzyme inhibitory activity. Additionally, their protective effect against Fe<sup>2+</sup>-induced oxidative hepatic injury was investigated <em>ex vivo</em>. Saccharin showed the most significant (<em>p</em> < 0.05) <em>in vitro</em> antioxidant activity among the other sweeteners. Sucralose showed the most potent inhibitory effects against carbohydrate digestive enzymes, α-amylase (IC<sub>50</sub>= 0.2%), and α-glucosidase (IC<sub>50</sub>= 0.60%). Furthermore, it exhibited the most pronounced enhancement of glucose uptake in yeast cells (IC<sub>50</sub>= 0.06%). While aspartame was most effective against pancreatic lipase (<em>p</em> < 0.05), molecular docking results revealed that all sweeteners have appreciably strong binding affinity for the enzymes studied. Further, treatment with AS reversed oxidative stress, as evident by a reduction in nitric oxide (NO) and increased glutathione (GSH) level, catalase, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, with saccharin being the most effective in terms of antioxidative effects. Overall, the results of this study suggest that all studied AS have some level of antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and anti-obesogenic effects with saccharin found to be the most beneficial sweetener followed by sucralose, at least in this experimental condition. Hence, it is recommended that saccharin and sucralose may be used as a supplement in antidiabetic and anti-obesity food products.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article e02667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antidiabetic and anti-obesogenic potential of some artificial sweeteners; and their modulatory effects on iron-induced hepatic oxidative stress\",\"authors\":\"Huda Ismail, Almahi I. Mohamed, Nontokozo Z. Msomi, Md. Shahidul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The excessive consumption of simple carbohydrates, such as sucrose and fructose, has been identified as one of the most significant risk factors contributing to the development of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Consequently, the use of artificial sweeteners (AS) as sugar alternatives has surged. Present study was intended to examine the antioxidant, anti-obesogenic, and anti-diabetic potential of commonly used AS, namely saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, and acesulfame potassium, using <em>in vitro, ex vivo,</em> and <em>in silico</em> experimental models. The <em>in vitro</em> antioxidant activity was determined using the DPPH, NO, and OH<sup>•</sup> radical scavenging activities. The effects of the sweeteners on α-amylase, α-glucosidase, pancreatic lipase inhibitions, and glucose uptake using yeast cells were also evaluated. Computational molecular docking was further conducted to examine their mode of enzyme inhibitory activity. Additionally, their protective effect against Fe<sup>2+</sup>-induced oxidative hepatic injury was investigated <em>ex vivo</em>. Saccharin showed the most significant (<em>p</em> < 0.05) <em>in vitro</em> antioxidant activity among the other sweeteners. Sucralose showed the most potent inhibitory effects against carbohydrate digestive enzymes, α-amylase (IC<sub>50</sub>= 0.2%), and α-glucosidase (IC<sub>50</sub>= 0.60%). Furthermore, it exhibited the most pronounced enhancement of glucose uptake in yeast cells (IC<sub>50</sub>= 0.06%). While aspartame was most effective against pancreatic lipase (<em>p</em> < 0.05), molecular docking results revealed that all sweeteners have appreciably strong binding affinity for the enzymes studied. Further, treatment with AS reversed oxidative stress, as evident by a reduction in nitric oxide (NO) and increased glutathione (GSH) level, catalase, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, with saccharin being the most effective in terms of antioxidative effects. Overall, the results of this study suggest that all studied AS have some level of antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and anti-obesogenic effects with saccharin found to be the most beneficial sweetener followed by sucralose, at least in this experimental condition. Hence, it is recommended that saccharin and sucralose may be used as a supplement in antidiabetic and anti-obesity food products.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific African\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article e02667\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific African\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625001371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625001371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
过量摄入蔗糖和果糖等简单碳水化合物已被确定为导致 2 型糖尿病和肥胖症的最重要风险因素之一。因此,人工甜味剂(AS)作为糖类替代品的使用激增。本研究旨在利用体外、体内和硅学实验模型,研究常用人工甜味剂(即糖精、三氯蔗糖、阿斯巴甜和安赛蜜钾)的抗氧化、抗致肥胖和抗糖尿病潜力。体外抗氧化活性采用 DPPH、NO 和 OH 自由基清除活性进行测定。此外,还利用酵母细胞评估了甜味剂对α-淀粉酶、α-葡萄糖苷酶、胰脂肪酶抑制作用和葡萄糖吸收的影响。还进一步进行了计算分子对接,以研究它们的酶抑制活性模式。此外,还研究了它们对 Fe2+ 诱导的氧化性肝损伤的保护作用。在其他甜味剂中,糖精的体外抗氧化活性最为显著(p < 0.05)。三氯蔗糖对碳水化合物消化酶、α-淀粉酶(IC50= 0.2%)和α-葡萄糖苷酶(IC50= 0.60%)的抑制作用最强。此外,它对酵母细胞摄取葡萄糖的增强作用最为明显(IC50= 0.06%)。虽然阿斯巴甜对胰脂肪酶最有效(p < 0.05),但分子对接结果显示,所有甜味剂都与所研究的酶有明显的强结合亲和力。此外,用 AS 处理可逆转氧化应激,一氧化氮(NO)的减少和谷胱甘肽(GSH)水平、过氧化氢酶和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性的增加都证明了这一点,其中糖精的抗氧化效果最好。总之,本研究的结果表明,所有研究的 AS 都具有一定程度的抗氧化、抗糖尿病和抗致胖作用,其中糖精是最有益的甜味剂,其次是三氯蔗糖,至少在本实验条件下是如此。因此,建议糖精和蔗糖素(三氯蔗糖)可用作抗糖尿病和抗肥胖食品的补充剂。
Antidiabetic and anti-obesogenic potential of some artificial sweeteners; and their modulatory effects on iron-induced hepatic oxidative stress
The excessive consumption of simple carbohydrates, such as sucrose and fructose, has been identified as one of the most significant risk factors contributing to the development of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Consequently, the use of artificial sweeteners (AS) as sugar alternatives has surged. Present study was intended to examine the antioxidant, anti-obesogenic, and anti-diabetic potential of commonly used AS, namely saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, and acesulfame potassium, using in vitro, ex vivo, and in silico experimental models. The in vitro antioxidant activity was determined using the DPPH, NO, and OH• radical scavenging activities. The effects of the sweeteners on α-amylase, α-glucosidase, pancreatic lipase inhibitions, and glucose uptake using yeast cells were also evaluated. Computational molecular docking was further conducted to examine their mode of enzyme inhibitory activity. Additionally, their protective effect against Fe2+-induced oxidative hepatic injury was investigated ex vivo. Saccharin showed the most significant (p < 0.05) in vitro antioxidant activity among the other sweeteners. Sucralose showed the most potent inhibitory effects against carbohydrate digestive enzymes, α-amylase (IC50= 0.2%), and α-glucosidase (IC50= 0.60%). Furthermore, it exhibited the most pronounced enhancement of glucose uptake in yeast cells (IC50= 0.06%). While aspartame was most effective against pancreatic lipase (p < 0.05), molecular docking results revealed that all sweeteners have appreciably strong binding affinity for the enzymes studied. Further, treatment with AS reversed oxidative stress, as evident by a reduction in nitric oxide (NO) and increased glutathione (GSH) level, catalase, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, with saccharin being the most effective in terms of antioxidative effects. Overall, the results of this study suggest that all studied AS have some level of antioxidant, anti-diabetic, and anti-obesogenic effects with saccharin found to be the most beneficial sweetener followed by sucralose, at least in this experimental condition. Hence, it is recommended that saccharin and sucralose may be used as a supplement in antidiabetic and anti-obesity food products.