{"title":"消费者要求透明......但他们真的会参与吗?探索品牌透明度信息的动机和互动方式","authors":"Kate Sansome, Jodie Conduit, Dean Wilkie","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Popular press depicts consumers as increasingly seeking brand transparency, wanting to know more about their processes, products, and values. This research seeks to understand how and why consumers process and interact with brand transparency-related information and explores whether and how less-engaged consumers form brand transparency perceptions. A qualitative approach is undertaken with twenty-three in-depth interviews for a systematic, inductive analysis. The study finds three approaches (active, passive, and dormant) for how consumers process transparency-related information to form brand transparency perceptions. Five motivational states are outlined to explain why consumers engage with brand transparency. Transparency becomes salient under two conditions: risk in decision-making and personal relevance. The findings, underpinned by the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Self-Determination Theory, reveal a dynamic, iterative process of perception formation. Managerial implications emphasize tailoring transparency strategies to diverse informational needs, broadening consumer touchpoints, and enhancing salience to capture attention effectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 115386"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers demand transparency… but do they actually engage? Exploring motives and interactions with brand transparency information\",\"authors\":\"Kate Sansome, Jodie Conduit, Dean Wilkie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Popular press depicts consumers as increasingly seeking brand transparency, wanting to know more about their processes, products, and values. This research seeks to understand how and why consumers process and interact with brand transparency-related information and explores whether and how less-engaged consumers form brand transparency perceptions. A qualitative approach is undertaken with twenty-three in-depth interviews for a systematic, inductive analysis. The study finds three approaches (active, passive, and dormant) for how consumers process transparency-related information to form brand transparency perceptions. Five motivational states are outlined to explain why consumers engage with brand transparency. Transparency becomes salient under two conditions: risk in decision-making and personal relevance. The findings, underpinned by the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Self-Determination Theory, reveal a dynamic, iterative process of perception formation. Managerial implications emphasize tailoring transparency strategies to diverse informational needs, broadening consumer touchpoints, and enhancing salience to capture attention effectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002097\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002097","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consumers demand transparency… but do they actually engage? Exploring motives and interactions with brand transparency information
Popular press depicts consumers as increasingly seeking brand transparency, wanting to know more about their processes, products, and values. This research seeks to understand how and why consumers process and interact with brand transparency-related information and explores whether and how less-engaged consumers form brand transparency perceptions. A qualitative approach is undertaken with twenty-three in-depth interviews for a systematic, inductive analysis. The study finds three approaches (active, passive, and dormant) for how consumers process transparency-related information to form brand transparency perceptions. Five motivational states are outlined to explain why consumers engage with brand transparency. Transparency becomes salient under two conditions: risk in decision-making and personal relevance. The findings, underpinned by the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Self-Determination Theory, reveal a dynamic, iterative process of perception formation. Managerial implications emphasize tailoring transparency strategies to diverse informational needs, broadening consumer touchpoints, and enhancing salience to capture attention effectively.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.