{"title":"服务营销组合与客户参与:荟萃分析","authors":"Sudeep Rohit , Kumar Rakesh Ranjan , G. Shainesh","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Service brands employ two primary strategies to promote customer engagement (CE). The first is customer engagement marketing, which involves deliberate tactics, such as contests or brand selfies, designed to encourage customers to dedicate resources and interact with the brand. The second strategy relies on traditional marketing approaches, which, rather than actively promoting CE, create conditions that enable CE to occur organically through positive product or brand experiences. Research suggests that traditional strategies can sometimes be more effective than customer engagement marketing in driving CE. Despite the significance of services in the global economy, little research examines the impact of the service marketing mix (SMM) on the organic development of CE. This meta-analysis quantifies the unified direct effect of SMM elements on different dimensions of CE using 1,188 individual effect sizes from 156 research papers, representing a cumulative sample of 77,843 respondents. Results reveal that the ‘product’ and ‘people’ elements of the SMM exert the strongest influence across most CE dimensions, while ‘price’ and ‘promotion’ demonstrate lower impact. ‘Physical evidence’, ‘place’, and ‘process’ elements of the mix exhibit varying effects across dimensions. For deeper insight, we analyze how conceptual moderators (industry type, firm size, geographic location, and business context) and methodological moderators (data collection approach and sample type) influence the direct effects. Our analysis reveals significant differences based on firm size, industry type, study entity, business context and location. We conclude with theoretical implications and managerial guidance for optimizing investments in the SMM to enhance CE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 115363"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service marketing mix and customer engagement: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sudeep Rohit , Kumar Rakesh Ranjan , G. Shainesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Service brands employ two primary strategies to promote customer engagement (CE). The first is customer engagement marketing, which involves deliberate tactics, such as contests or brand selfies, designed to encourage customers to dedicate resources and interact with the brand. The second strategy relies on traditional marketing approaches, which, rather than actively promoting CE, create conditions that enable CE to occur organically through positive product or brand experiences. Research suggests that traditional strategies can sometimes be more effective than customer engagement marketing in driving CE. Despite the significance of services in the global economy, little research examines the impact of the service marketing mix (SMM) on the organic development of CE. This meta-analysis quantifies the unified direct effect of SMM elements on different dimensions of CE using 1,188 individual effect sizes from 156 research papers, representing a cumulative sample of 77,843 respondents. Results reveal that the ‘product’ and ‘people’ elements of the SMM exert the strongest influence across most CE dimensions, while ‘price’ and ‘promotion’ demonstrate lower impact. ‘Physical evidence’, ‘place’, and ‘process’ elements of the mix exhibit varying effects across dimensions. For deeper insight, we analyze how conceptual moderators (industry type, firm size, geographic location, and business context) and methodological moderators (data collection approach and sample type) influence the direct effects. Our analysis reveals significant differences based on firm size, industry type, study entity, business context and location. We conclude with theoretical implications and managerial guidance for optimizing investments in the SMM to enhance CE.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001869\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325001869","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Service marketing mix and customer engagement: A meta-analysis
Service brands employ two primary strategies to promote customer engagement (CE). The first is customer engagement marketing, which involves deliberate tactics, such as contests or brand selfies, designed to encourage customers to dedicate resources and interact with the brand. The second strategy relies on traditional marketing approaches, which, rather than actively promoting CE, create conditions that enable CE to occur organically through positive product or brand experiences. Research suggests that traditional strategies can sometimes be more effective than customer engagement marketing in driving CE. Despite the significance of services in the global economy, little research examines the impact of the service marketing mix (SMM) on the organic development of CE. This meta-analysis quantifies the unified direct effect of SMM elements on different dimensions of CE using 1,188 individual effect sizes from 156 research papers, representing a cumulative sample of 77,843 respondents. Results reveal that the ‘product’ and ‘people’ elements of the SMM exert the strongest influence across most CE dimensions, while ‘price’ and ‘promotion’ demonstrate lower impact. ‘Physical evidence’, ‘place’, and ‘process’ elements of the mix exhibit varying effects across dimensions. For deeper insight, we analyze how conceptual moderators (industry type, firm size, geographic location, and business context) and methodological moderators (data collection approach and sample type) influence the direct effects. Our analysis reveals significant differences based on firm size, industry type, study entity, business context and location. We conclude with theoretical implications and managerial guidance for optimizing investments in the SMM to enhance CE.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.