Elin May , Ruiyao Li , Jianxiang Shen , Wenjia Cai , Annela Anger-Kraavi
{"title":"低碳能源转型对社会不平等影响的最新进展回顾","authors":"Elin May , Ruiyao Li , Jianxiang Shen , Wenjia Cai , Annela Anger-Kraavi","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Paris Agreement set, in response to the current climate crisis, a long-term temperature target to stimulate ambitious mitigative action across all countries. The need to ensure equality, or a just transition, throughout such unprecedented transformations towards low-carbon economies has been attracting increasing attention in recent years. However, there remains great uncertainty in the potential inequality impacts of transitioning to low-carbon energy sources (e.g., solar, wind, biofuels). This review examines academic literature on low-carbon energy transitions across five years (2019–2023) - focusing on employment, income, health, and gender inequalities - to identify common avenues through which inequalities arise, and understand how policy can be designed to avoid and/or mitigate negative outcomes. In addition, it explores how relevant literature into the inequality impacts of low-carbon energy transitions has evolved. The synthesis shows that recent literature has expanded in scope and granularity, with research increasingly focused on multiple dimensions of inequality at finer scales, providing a greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms stimulating negative outcomes, as well as on how different types of inequalities interact with one another and reinforce adverse side-effects. Despite inequality outcomes presenting in different ways, all inequalities reviewed stem from, and are dependent upon, a multitude of social, cultural, economic, political, geographical, and technological factors. Inequality outcomes frequently compound with pre-existing social inequalities, and risk undermining the possibility of achieving a just transition. However, enhanced disaggregated data is still required to understand the full range of potential inequality impacts and identify the best remediation strategies to guide a just energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"391 ","pages":"Article 125926"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of recent Progress on social inequality impacts of low-carbon energy transitions\",\"authors\":\"Elin May , Ruiyao Li , Jianxiang Shen , Wenjia Cai , Annela Anger-Kraavi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Paris Agreement set, in response to the current climate crisis, a long-term temperature target to stimulate ambitious mitigative action across all countries. The need to ensure equality, or a just transition, throughout such unprecedented transformations towards low-carbon economies has been attracting increasing attention in recent years. However, there remains great uncertainty in the potential inequality impacts of transitioning to low-carbon energy sources (e.g., solar, wind, biofuels). This review examines academic literature on low-carbon energy transitions across five years (2019–2023) - focusing on employment, income, health, and gender inequalities - to identify common avenues through which inequalities arise, and understand how policy can be designed to avoid and/or mitigate negative outcomes. In addition, it explores how relevant literature into the inequality impacts of low-carbon energy transitions has evolved. The synthesis shows that recent literature has expanded in scope and granularity, with research increasingly focused on multiple dimensions of inequality at finer scales, providing a greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms stimulating negative outcomes, as well as on how different types of inequalities interact with one another and reinforce adverse side-effects. Despite inequality outcomes presenting in different ways, all inequalities reviewed stem from, and are dependent upon, a multitude of social, cultural, economic, political, geographical, and technological factors. Inequality outcomes frequently compound with pre-existing social inequalities, and risk undermining the possibility of achieving a just transition. However, enhanced disaggregated data is still required to understand the full range of potential inequality impacts and identify the best remediation strategies to guide a just energy transition.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"391 \",\"pages\":\"Article 125926\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925006567\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925006567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A review of recent Progress on social inequality impacts of low-carbon energy transitions
The Paris Agreement set, in response to the current climate crisis, a long-term temperature target to stimulate ambitious mitigative action across all countries. The need to ensure equality, or a just transition, throughout such unprecedented transformations towards low-carbon economies has been attracting increasing attention in recent years. However, there remains great uncertainty in the potential inequality impacts of transitioning to low-carbon energy sources (e.g., solar, wind, biofuels). This review examines academic literature on low-carbon energy transitions across five years (2019–2023) - focusing on employment, income, health, and gender inequalities - to identify common avenues through which inequalities arise, and understand how policy can be designed to avoid and/or mitigate negative outcomes. In addition, it explores how relevant literature into the inequality impacts of low-carbon energy transitions has evolved. The synthesis shows that recent literature has expanded in scope and granularity, with research increasingly focused on multiple dimensions of inequality at finer scales, providing a greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms stimulating negative outcomes, as well as on how different types of inequalities interact with one another and reinforce adverse side-effects. Despite inequality outcomes presenting in different ways, all inequalities reviewed stem from, and are dependent upon, a multitude of social, cultural, economic, political, geographical, and technological factors. Inequality outcomes frequently compound with pre-existing social inequalities, and risk undermining the possibility of achieving a just transition. However, enhanced disaggregated data is still required to understand the full range of potential inequality impacts and identify the best remediation strategies to guide a just energy transition.
期刊介绍:
Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.