区分凿石穿孔器和雕刻器

IF 2.7 1区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
William Engelbrecht, Sean Hanrahan
{"title":"区分凿石穿孔器和雕刻器","authors":"William Engelbrecht, Sean Hanrahan","doi":"10.1017/aaq.2024.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chipped stone tools termed perforators and gravers are characterized by projections. Although the implied function of these tool types differs, there are no guidelines for classifying perforators and gravers based on their morphology. Consequently, researchers classify these tools differently, which precludes meaningful comparisons of the frequencies of these types between assemblages. A use-wear study confirmed the hypothesis that specimens with a thin projection and a sharp distal angle often had perforation use wear. Specimens with graver use wear were characterized by a range of projection perimeters and distal angles. We recommend that specimens with a projection perimeter of 20 mm or less and a distal angle of 40 degrees or less be classified as perforators and those with greater dimensions as gravers. This will achieve a consistent classification system for perforators and gravers, although it must be recognized that these type names may not be indicative of the function of individual specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":7424,"journal":{"name":"American Antiquity","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating Chipped Stone Perforators from Gravers\",\"authors\":\"William Engelbrecht, Sean Hanrahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/aaq.2024.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Chipped stone tools termed perforators and gravers are characterized by projections. Although the implied function of these tool types differs, there are no guidelines for classifying perforators and gravers based on their morphology. Consequently, researchers classify these tools differently, which precludes meaningful comparisons of the frequencies of these types between assemblages. A use-wear study confirmed the hypothesis that specimens with a thin projection and a sharp distal angle often had perforation use wear. Specimens with graver use wear were characterized by a range of projection perimeters and distal angles. We recommend that specimens with a projection perimeter of 20 mm or less and a distal angle of 40 degrees or less be classified as perforators and those with greater dimensions as gravers. This will achieve a consistent classification system for perforators and gravers, although it must be recognized that these type names may not be indicative of the function of individual specimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Antiquity\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Antiquity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2024.83\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2024.83","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

被称为穿孔器和雕刻器的碎石制工具的特点是突出。虽然这些工具类型的隐含功能不同,但没有根据其形态对射孔器和雕刻器进行分类的指南。因此,研究人员对这些工具进行了不同的分类,这就排除了在组合之间对这些类型的频率进行有意义的比较。一项使用磨损研究证实了一个假设,即标本的薄投影和尖锐的远端角度往往有穿孔使用磨损。使用磨损严重的标本的特征是投影周长和远端角度的范围。我们建议标本的投影周长为20mm或更小,远端角度为40度或更小被分类为穿孔和那些更大的尺寸为雕刻。这将实现穿孔器和雕刻器的一致分类系统,尽管必须认识到这些类型名称可能不能表明单个标本的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differentiating Chipped Stone Perforators from Gravers

Chipped stone tools termed perforators and gravers are characterized by projections. Although the implied function of these tool types differs, there are no guidelines for classifying perforators and gravers based on their morphology. Consequently, researchers classify these tools differently, which precludes meaningful comparisons of the frequencies of these types between assemblages. A use-wear study confirmed the hypothesis that specimens with a thin projection and a sharp distal angle often had perforation use wear. Specimens with graver use wear were characterized by a range of projection perimeters and distal angles. We recommend that specimens with a projection perimeter of 20 mm or less and a distal angle of 40 degrees or less be classified as perforators and those with greater dimensions as gravers. This will achieve a consistent classification system for perforators and gravers, although it must be recognized that these type names may not be indicative of the function of individual specimens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Antiquity
American Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
95
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信