慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者炎症型对疾病发展轨迹的影响

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Christina Dorismond,Yash Trivedi,Mason R Krysinski,Rory J Lubner,Li-Ching Huang,Sandeep Goswami,Quanhu Sheng,Rakesh K Chandra,Naweed I Chowdhury,Justin H Turner
{"title":"慢性鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者炎症型对疾病发展轨迹的影响","authors":"Christina Dorismond,Yash Trivedi,Mason R Krysinski,Rory J Lubner,Li-Ching Huang,Sandeep Goswami,Quanhu Sheng,Rakesh K Chandra,Naweed I Chowdhury,Justin H Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.jaci.2025.03.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nWhile phenotypic features have traditionally guided treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), recent research has favored categorization based on inflammatory endotype. However, the impact of endotypic differences on clinical outcomes remains largely unknown.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nWe aimed to compare disease trajectory, primarily time-to-polyp recurrence, between CRS with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) endotypes.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nSamples were obtained from CRSwNP patients undergoing surgery between 2015-2023, and cytokine levels were measured using a multiplex bead assay. Principal component analysis followed by hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify endotype clusters. Clinical outcomes were subsequently compared between clusters RESULTS: We identified 6 CRSwNP disease clusters among the 269 included patients. Cluster 1 (46.5%) was characterized by relatively low inflammation. Clusters 4 (13.3%) and 6 (7.1%) also exhibited low inflammation but with elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-12/IL-21 and CCL5, respectively. Cluster 2 (4.5%) represented a mixed type 1/3 inflammatory endotype (IFN-γHigh/IL-4High/IL-17AHigh), and Cluster 3 (10.0%) was characterized by an innate, proinflammatory response (IL-1βHigh/IL-6High/IL-8High). Cluster 5 (18.9%) exhibited type 2 dominant inflammation (IL-5High/IL-9High/IL-13High). When comparing disease trajectory, Cluster 2 (IFN-γHigh/IL-4High/IL-17AHigh) and 4 (IL-12High/IL-21High) had the shortest time-to-polyp recurrence, while Cluster 3 (IL-1βHigh/IL-6High/IL-8High) demonstrated the longest time-to-recurrence (p<0.001). Time-to-oral steroids (p=0.13) and time-to-biologic therapy (p=0.43) were similar across clusters CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the heterogenous nature of CRSwNP and differences in disease trajectory between endotypes, notably that patients with mixed type 1 and 3 inflammation demonstrate more recalcitrant disease. These findings suggest that therapies beyond traditional type 2 inflammation treatments may be needed to effectively reduce CRSwNP disease recurrence.","PeriodicalId":14936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Inflammatory Endotypes on Disease Trajectory in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.\",\"authors\":\"Christina Dorismond,Yash Trivedi,Mason R Krysinski,Rory J Lubner,Li-Ching Huang,Sandeep Goswami,Quanhu Sheng,Rakesh K Chandra,Naweed I Chowdhury,Justin H Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaci.2025.03.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nWhile phenotypic features have traditionally guided treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), recent research has favored categorization based on inflammatory endotype. However, the impact of endotypic differences on clinical outcomes remains largely unknown.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nWe aimed to compare disease trajectory, primarily time-to-polyp recurrence, between CRS with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) endotypes.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nSamples were obtained from CRSwNP patients undergoing surgery between 2015-2023, and cytokine levels were measured using a multiplex bead assay. Principal component analysis followed by hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify endotype clusters. Clinical outcomes were subsequently compared between clusters RESULTS: We identified 6 CRSwNP disease clusters among the 269 included patients. Cluster 1 (46.5%) was characterized by relatively low inflammation. Clusters 4 (13.3%) and 6 (7.1%) also exhibited low inflammation but with elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-12/IL-21 and CCL5, respectively. Cluster 2 (4.5%) represented a mixed type 1/3 inflammatory endotype (IFN-γHigh/IL-4High/IL-17AHigh), and Cluster 3 (10.0%) was characterized by an innate, proinflammatory response (IL-1βHigh/IL-6High/IL-8High). Cluster 5 (18.9%) exhibited type 2 dominant inflammation (IL-5High/IL-9High/IL-13High). When comparing disease trajectory, Cluster 2 (IFN-γHigh/IL-4High/IL-17AHigh) and 4 (IL-12High/IL-21High) had the shortest time-to-polyp recurrence, while Cluster 3 (IL-1βHigh/IL-6High/IL-8High) demonstrated the longest time-to-recurrence (p<0.001). Time-to-oral steroids (p=0.13) and time-to-biologic therapy (p=0.43) were similar across clusters CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the heterogenous nature of CRSwNP and differences in disease trajectory between endotypes, notably that patients with mixed type 1 and 3 inflammation demonstrate more recalcitrant disease. These findings suggest that therapies beyond traditional type 2 inflammation treatments may be needed to effectively reduce CRSwNP disease recurrence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2025.03.029\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2025.03.029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然表型特征传统上指导慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的治疗,但最近的研究倾向于基于炎症内型的分类。然而,内源性差异对临床结果的影响在很大程度上仍然未知。目的:我们旨在比较CRS和鼻息肉(CRSwNP)内分型的疾病发展轨迹,主要是到息肉复发的时间。方法从2015-2023年间接受手术的CRSwNP患者中获取样本,采用多重头法检测细胞因子水平。采用主成分分析和层次聚类分析鉴定内源性聚类。结果:我们在269例纳入的患者中确定了6个CRSwNP疾病集群。第1组(46.5%)的特点是相对较低的炎症。第4组(13.3%)和第6组(7.1%)也表现出低炎症,但白细胞介素(IL)-12/IL-21和CCL5水平分别升高。第2类(4.5%)为混合1/3型炎症内型(IFN-γ高/IL-4High/IL-17AHigh),第3类(10.0%)为先天促炎反应(il -1β高/IL-6High/IL-8High)。第5组(18.9%)表现为2型显性炎症(IL-5High/IL-9High/IL-13High)。比较疾病发展轨迹,聚类2 (IFN-γHigh/IL-4High/IL-17AHigh)和聚类4 (IL-12High/IL-21High)到息肉复发时间最短,聚类3 (IL-1βHigh/IL-6High/IL-8High)到息肉复发时间最长(p<0.001)。结论:我们的研究强调了CRSwNP的异质性和不同内型之间疾病发展的差异,特别是混合1型和3型炎症患者表现出更顽固性的疾病。这些发现表明,可能需要传统2型炎症治疗之外的治疗来有效减少CRSwNP疾病的复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Inflammatory Endotypes on Disease Trajectory in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps.
BACKGROUND While phenotypic features have traditionally guided treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), recent research has favored categorization based on inflammatory endotype. However, the impact of endotypic differences on clinical outcomes remains largely unknown. OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare disease trajectory, primarily time-to-polyp recurrence, between CRS with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) endotypes. METHODS Samples were obtained from CRSwNP patients undergoing surgery between 2015-2023, and cytokine levels were measured using a multiplex bead assay. Principal component analysis followed by hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify endotype clusters. Clinical outcomes were subsequently compared between clusters RESULTS: We identified 6 CRSwNP disease clusters among the 269 included patients. Cluster 1 (46.5%) was characterized by relatively low inflammation. Clusters 4 (13.3%) and 6 (7.1%) also exhibited low inflammation but with elevated levels of interleukin (IL)-12/IL-21 and CCL5, respectively. Cluster 2 (4.5%) represented a mixed type 1/3 inflammatory endotype (IFN-γHigh/IL-4High/IL-17AHigh), and Cluster 3 (10.0%) was characterized by an innate, proinflammatory response (IL-1βHigh/IL-6High/IL-8High). Cluster 5 (18.9%) exhibited type 2 dominant inflammation (IL-5High/IL-9High/IL-13High). When comparing disease trajectory, Cluster 2 (IFN-γHigh/IL-4High/IL-17AHigh) and 4 (IL-12High/IL-21High) had the shortest time-to-polyp recurrence, while Cluster 3 (IL-1βHigh/IL-6High/IL-8High) demonstrated the longest time-to-recurrence (p<0.001). Time-to-oral steroids (p=0.13) and time-to-biologic therapy (p=0.43) were similar across clusters CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the heterogenous nature of CRSwNP and differences in disease trajectory between endotypes, notably that patients with mixed type 1 and 3 inflammation demonstrate more recalcitrant disease. These findings suggest that therapies beyond traditional type 2 inflammation treatments may be needed to effectively reduce CRSwNP disease recurrence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
1302
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is a prestigious publication that features groundbreaking research in the fields of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. This influential journal publishes high-impact research papers that explore various topics, including asthma, food allergy, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, primary immune deficiencies, occupational and environmental allergy, and other allergic and immunologic diseases. The articles not only report on clinical trials and mechanistic studies but also provide insights into novel therapies, underlying mechanisms, and important discoveries that contribute to our understanding of these diseases. By sharing this valuable information, the journal aims to enhance the diagnosis and management of patients in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信