在纵向青少年体能发展中,成熟成长比训练参与更有影响力吗?

Shaun Abbott, Marie Javet, Stephen Bested, Daniel Hackett, Michael Romann, Stephen Cobley
{"title":"在纵向青少年体能发展中,成熟成长比训练参与更有影响力吗?","authors":"Shaun Abbott,&nbsp;Marie Javet,&nbsp;Stephen Bested,&nbsp;Daniel Hackett,&nbsp;Michael Romann,&nbsp;Stephen Cobley","doi":"10.1002/ejsc.12293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Athlete development is considered a multi-factorial and dynamic overtime process. Thus, understanding what factors and behavioural activities contribute most to development is important. The present study examined longitudinal relationships between training time and maturity status with physical performance indices in youth volleyball players. Prospective mixed longitudinal tracking over 3 years. Participants were <i>N</i> = 78 selected male volleyball players, aged 11–15 years (<i>M</i> = 13.81, <i>SD</i> = 1.20 years) from <i>N</i> = 41 competitive Swiss clubs. Alongside coach-reported weekly training time, participants completed standardised anthropometric and physical performance tests (e.g., standing long jump [SLJ]; 9-3-6-3-9 agility sprint). Linear mixed models (LMM) examined longitudinal independent and interacting relationships between training time and maturity status (years from peak height velocity; PHV) with physical performance. For SLJ, both training time and maturity status explained curvilinear longitudinal performance development, but nonlinear maturation status interactions were most influential, moderating relationships. In agility sprint, similar trends were apparent, with training time influences diminishing when maturity status was added in LMM analyses. Across time points of maturational growth, increased training engagement was not associated with enhanced physical performance benefits, whereas maturational status progression better accounted for performance differences and development. For coaches and sports-science practitioners, findings question the rationale for heightened training engagement at circa-PHV directed towards physical performance development purposes, a recommendation aligned with the need for maturational-growth associated injury prevention. Instead, due to musculoskeletal and proprioceptive disturbance during maturational growth, training emphasis on technical/biomechanical skill acquisition remains important.</p>","PeriodicalId":93999,"journal":{"name":"European journal of sport science","volume":"25 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12293","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Maturational Growth More Influential than Training Engagement in Longitudinal Adolescent Physical Performance Development?\",\"authors\":\"Shaun Abbott,&nbsp;Marie Javet,&nbsp;Stephen Bested,&nbsp;Daniel Hackett,&nbsp;Michael Romann,&nbsp;Stephen Cobley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsc.12293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Athlete development is considered a multi-factorial and dynamic overtime process. Thus, understanding what factors and behavioural activities contribute most to development is important. The present study examined longitudinal relationships between training time and maturity status with physical performance indices in youth volleyball players. Prospective mixed longitudinal tracking over 3 years. Participants were <i>N</i> = 78 selected male volleyball players, aged 11–15 years (<i>M</i> = 13.81, <i>SD</i> = 1.20 years) from <i>N</i> = 41 competitive Swiss clubs. Alongside coach-reported weekly training time, participants completed standardised anthropometric and physical performance tests (e.g., standing long jump [SLJ]; 9-3-6-3-9 agility sprint). Linear mixed models (LMM) examined longitudinal independent and interacting relationships between training time and maturity status (years from peak height velocity; PHV) with physical performance. For SLJ, both training time and maturity status explained curvilinear longitudinal performance development, but nonlinear maturation status interactions were most influential, moderating relationships. In agility sprint, similar trends were apparent, with training time influences diminishing when maturity status was added in LMM analyses. Across time points of maturational growth, increased training engagement was not associated with enhanced physical performance benefits, whereas maturational status progression better accounted for performance differences and development. For coaches and sports-science practitioners, findings question the rationale for heightened training engagement at circa-PHV directed towards physical performance development purposes, a recommendation aligned with the need for maturational-growth associated injury prevention. Instead, due to musculoskeletal and proprioceptive disturbance during maturational growth, training emphasis on technical/biomechanical skill acquisition remains important.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsc.12293\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of sport science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of sport science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsc.12293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动员的发展被认为是一个多因素和动态的超时过程。因此,了解哪些因素和行为活动对发展贡献最大非常重要。本研究考察了青少年排球运动员的训练时间和成熟状态与身体表现指数之间的纵向关系。前瞻性混合纵向追踪为期 3 年。研究对象是经过挑选的 78 名男子排球运动员,年龄在 11-15 岁之间(平均年龄为 13.81 岁,平均年龄为 1.20 岁),他们来自瑞士的 41 家竞技俱乐部。除了教练报告的每周训练时间外,参与者还完成了标准化人体测量和体能测试(如立定跳远[SLJ];9-3-6-3-9敏捷冲刺)。线性混合模型(LMM)检验了训练时间和成熟度(从身高峰值速度算起的年数;PHV)与体能表现之间的纵向独立关系和交互关系。对于SLJ,训练时间和成熟度状态都能解释纵向成绩曲线发展,但非线性成熟度状态交互作用影响最大,调节了两者之间的关系。在敏捷性短跑中,类似的趋势也很明显,当在 LMM 分析中加入成熟度状况时,训练时间的影响就会减弱。在不同的成熟成长时间点上,训练参与度的增加与体能成绩的提高并无关联,而成熟状态的进展则能更好地解释成绩差异和发展。对于教练和体育科学从业者来说,研究结果质疑了在大约青春期开始时为提高身体表现而加强训练的合理性,因为这一建议符合与成熟成长相关的伤害预防需求。相反,由于成熟发育期的肌肉骨骼和本体感觉障碍,强调技术/生物力学技能学习的训练仍然非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is Maturational Growth More Influential than Training Engagement in Longitudinal Adolescent Physical Performance Development?

Is Maturational Growth More Influential than Training Engagement in Longitudinal Adolescent Physical Performance Development?

Athlete development is considered a multi-factorial and dynamic overtime process. Thus, understanding what factors and behavioural activities contribute most to development is important. The present study examined longitudinal relationships between training time and maturity status with physical performance indices in youth volleyball players. Prospective mixed longitudinal tracking over 3 years. Participants were N = 78 selected male volleyball players, aged 11–15 years (M = 13.81, SD = 1.20 years) from N = 41 competitive Swiss clubs. Alongside coach-reported weekly training time, participants completed standardised anthropometric and physical performance tests (e.g., standing long jump [SLJ]; 9-3-6-3-9 agility sprint). Linear mixed models (LMM) examined longitudinal independent and interacting relationships between training time and maturity status (years from peak height velocity; PHV) with physical performance. For SLJ, both training time and maturity status explained curvilinear longitudinal performance development, but nonlinear maturation status interactions were most influential, moderating relationships. In agility sprint, similar trends were apparent, with training time influences diminishing when maturity status was added in LMM analyses. Across time points of maturational growth, increased training engagement was not associated with enhanced physical performance benefits, whereas maturational status progression better accounted for performance differences and development. For coaches and sports-science practitioners, findings question the rationale for heightened training engagement at circa-PHV directed towards physical performance development purposes, a recommendation aligned with the need for maturational-growth associated injury prevention. Instead, due to musculoskeletal and proprioceptive disturbance during maturational growth, training emphasis on technical/biomechanical skill acquisition remains important.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信