构建循环经济理论:一个面向实践的视角与前进方向

IF 4.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Benito Mignacca, Serena Filippelli, Serena Strazzullo, Luigi Tiburzi, Andrea Urbinati, Julian Kirchherr
{"title":"构建循环经济理论:一个面向实践的视角与前进方向","authors":"Benito Mignacca,&nbsp;Serena Filippelli,&nbsp;Serena Strazzullo,&nbsp;Luigi Tiburzi,&nbsp;Andrea Urbinati,&nbsp;Julian Kirchherr","doi":"10.1111/jiec.13622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the growing interest in circular economy (CE) and the recognition of CE as a research field, the process of building CE theories remains underdeveloped and disorganized. Relevant reasons might include a lack of a clear understanding of what a CE theory can be, the prevalence of gap-spotting research, and a lack of a common goal for CE scholars. First, this forum article defines “CE theory” adopting a positivistic approach. Second, the article presents a more organized structure toward the development of a CE theory oriented on empirical practices. In addition, this study highlights how the development of “partial CE theories” focusing on specific CE practices, or a combination of them, should be the first step toward an integrative CE theory. Third, the paper suggests two main ways for developing partial CE theories: (i) consolidating concepts already developed into elements of a theoretical framework; (ii) framing future pieces of explicative research that contribute to partial CE theories. Last, by adopting a positivistic approach and a practical-oriented perspective, this research provides an example of contribution to the partial theory of reuse. In particular, by leveraging the form of propositional theorizing, this article explains why reuse practices are expected to be observed in industries characterized by a high degree of product modularization, standardization, and innovation. In doing so, this forum article aims to enrich and foster theoretical contributions of future CE studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 2","pages":"418-428"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building circular economy theories: A practical-oriented perspective and a way forward\",\"authors\":\"Benito Mignacca,&nbsp;Serena Filippelli,&nbsp;Serena Strazzullo,&nbsp;Luigi Tiburzi,&nbsp;Andrea Urbinati,&nbsp;Julian Kirchherr\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jiec.13622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite the growing interest in circular economy (CE) and the recognition of CE as a research field, the process of building CE theories remains underdeveloped and disorganized. Relevant reasons might include a lack of a clear understanding of what a CE theory can be, the prevalence of gap-spotting research, and a lack of a common goal for CE scholars. First, this forum article defines “CE theory” adopting a positivistic approach. Second, the article presents a more organized structure toward the development of a CE theory oriented on empirical practices. In addition, this study highlights how the development of “partial CE theories” focusing on specific CE practices, or a combination of them, should be the first step toward an integrative CE theory. Third, the paper suggests two main ways for developing partial CE theories: (i) consolidating concepts already developed into elements of a theoretical framework; (ii) framing future pieces of explicative research that contribute to partial CE theories. Last, by adopting a positivistic approach and a practical-oriented perspective, this research provides an example of contribution to the partial theory of reuse. In particular, by leveraging the form of propositional theorizing, this article explains why reuse practices are expected to be observed in industries characterized by a high degree of product modularization, standardization, and innovation. In doing so, this forum article aims to enrich and foster theoretical contributions of future CE studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"418-428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.13622\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.13622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们对循环经济的兴趣日益浓厚,并认识到循环经济是一个研究领域,但构建循环经济理论的过程仍然不发达,而且杂乱无章。相关的原因可能包括缺乏对CE理论的清晰理解,空白发现研究的盛行,以及CE学者缺乏共同的目标。首先,这篇论坛文章采用实证主义的方法定义了“CE理论”。其次,本文提出了一个更有组织的结构,以发展面向实证实践的行政绩效理论。此外,本研究强调了如何发展专注于具体行政行为实践的“部分行政行为理论”,或将其结合起来,应该成为迈向综合行政行为理论的第一步。第三,本文提出了两种主要的发展路径:(1)将已经发展的概念整合为理论框架的要素;(ii)构建有助于部分CE理论的未来解释性研究。最后,本研究采用实证方法和面向实践的视角,提供了对局部重用理论的贡献实例。特别是,通过利用命题理论的形式,本文解释了为什么期望在以高度产品模块化、标准化和创新为特征的行业中观察到重用实践。因此,这篇论坛文章旨在丰富和促进未来行政长官研究的理论贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building circular economy theories: A practical-oriented perspective and a way forward

Despite the growing interest in circular economy (CE) and the recognition of CE as a research field, the process of building CE theories remains underdeveloped and disorganized. Relevant reasons might include a lack of a clear understanding of what a CE theory can be, the prevalence of gap-spotting research, and a lack of a common goal for CE scholars. First, this forum article defines “CE theory” adopting a positivistic approach. Second, the article presents a more organized structure toward the development of a CE theory oriented on empirical practices. In addition, this study highlights how the development of “partial CE theories” focusing on specific CE practices, or a combination of them, should be the first step toward an integrative CE theory. Third, the paper suggests two main ways for developing partial CE theories: (i) consolidating concepts already developed into elements of a theoretical framework; (ii) framing future pieces of explicative research that contribute to partial CE theories. Last, by adopting a positivistic approach and a practical-oriented perspective, this research provides an example of contribution to the partial theory of reuse. In particular, by leveraging the form of propositional theorizing, this article explains why reuse practices are expected to be observed in industries characterized by a high degree of product modularization, standardization, and innovation. In doing so, this forum article aims to enrich and foster theoretical contributions of future CE studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信