基于gis的层次分析法和频率比模型的洪水易感性评价与制图

IF 4 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Saad Ashfaq , Muhammad Tufail , Asif Niaz , Sher Muhammad , Hassan Alzahrani , Aqil Tariq
{"title":"基于gis的层次分析法和频率比模型的洪水易感性评价与制图","authors":"Saad Ashfaq ,&nbsp;Muhammad Tufail ,&nbsp;Asif Niaz ,&nbsp;Sher Muhammad ,&nbsp;Hassan Alzahrani ,&nbsp;Aqil Tariq","doi":"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, flood susceptibility maps were produced for district Nowshera by using Geographic Information System (GIS)-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Bivariate Statistical Frequency Ratio (FR) models. This study analyses twelve Hydro-geomorphological flood conditioning factors selected based on the scale and characteristics of the study area. These factors include elevation, slope, distance from the river, rainfall, drainage density, land use land cover (LULC), topographic wetness index (TWI), height above nearest drainage (HAND), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance from the road, curvature, and soil type. The weighted factors were then integrated using the weighted overlay technique in ArcGIS 10.8 to produce flood susceptibility maps, which were classified into five zones: very high, high, moderate, low, and very low susceptibility. The AHP model classified 145.1 km<sup>2</sup> (8.34 %) and 252.2 km<sup>2</sup> (14.49 %) of the area as very high and high flood susceptibility zones, respectively. While the FR model classified 94.6 km<sup>2</sup> (5.4 %) as very high and 230.5 km<sup>2</sup> (13.2 %) as high susceptibility zones. The models' results were validated using Receiver Operation Characteristics (ROC) Area Under Curve (AUC) and collected flood inventory. The calculated AUC values were 0.921 for the AHP model and 0.924 for the FR model, corresponding to accuracy of 92.1 % and 92.4 %, respectively. Through this study, we gained a deeper understanding of how hydro-geomorphological factors interact to influence flood susceptibility, emphasizing the importance of integrating multi-criteria and statistical approaches for accurate flood risk mapping. Our methodology provides a transferable framework that can be applied in diverse geographical contexts, aiding in flood mitigation planning for both data-rich and data-scarce regions worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55089,"journal":{"name":"Global and Planetary Change","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 104831"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flood susceptibility assessment and mapping using GIS-based analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio models\",\"authors\":\"Saad Ashfaq ,&nbsp;Muhammad Tufail ,&nbsp;Asif Niaz ,&nbsp;Sher Muhammad ,&nbsp;Hassan Alzahrani ,&nbsp;Aqil Tariq\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this study, flood susceptibility maps were produced for district Nowshera by using Geographic Information System (GIS)-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Bivariate Statistical Frequency Ratio (FR) models. This study analyses twelve Hydro-geomorphological flood conditioning factors selected based on the scale and characteristics of the study area. These factors include elevation, slope, distance from the river, rainfall, drainage density, land use land cover (LULC), topographic wetness index (TWI), height above nearest drainage (HAND), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance from the road, curvature, and soil type. The weighted factors were then integrated using the weighted overlay technique in ArcGIS 10.8 to produce flood susceptibility maps, which were classified into five zones: very high, high, moderate, low, and very low susceptibility. The AHP model classified 145.1 km<sup>2</sup> (8.34 %) and 252.2 km<sup>2</sup> (14.49 %) of the area as very high and high flood susceptibility zones, respectively. While the FR model classified 94.6 km<sup>2</sup> (5.4 %) as very high and 230.5 km<sup>2</sup> (13.2 %) as high susceptibility zones. The models' results were validated using Receiver Operation Characteristics (ROC) Area Under Curve (AUC) and collected flood inventory. The calculated AUC values were 0.921 for the AHP model and 0.924 for the FR model, corresponding to accuracy of 92.1 % and 92.4 %, respectively. Through this study, we gained a deeper understanding of how hydro-geomorphological factors interact to influence flood susceptibility, emphasizing the importance of integrating multi-criteria and statistical approaches for accurate flood risk mapping. Our methodology provides a transferable framework that can be applied in diverse geographical contexts, aiding in flood mitigation planning for both data-rich and data-scarce regions worldwide.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global and Planetary Change\",\"volume\":\"251 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global and Planetary Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818125001407\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Planetary Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818125001407","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用基于地理信息系统(GIS)的多准则决策分析(MCDA)、层次分析法(AHP)和双变量统计频率比(FR)模型,绘制了瑙谢拉地区的洪水易感性图。根据研究区规模和特点,选取了12个水文地貌洪水调节因子进行分析。这些因素包括海拔、坡度、与河流的距离、降雨量、排水密度、土地利用、土地覆盖、地形湿度指数(TWI)、离最近排水的高度(HAND)、归一化植被指数(NDVI)、与道路的距离、曲率和土壤类型。然后利用ArcGIS 10.8中的加权叠加技术对加权因子进行综合,得到洪水敏感性图,并将其划分为极高、高、中、低和极低5个敏感性区。AHP模型将145.1 km2(8.34%)和252.2 km2(14.49%)分别划分为洪水高易感性区和高易感性区。FR模型将94.6 km2(5.4%)划分为非常高敏感区,230.5 km2(13.2%)划分为高敏感区。利用受试者操作特征(ROC)、曲线下面积(AUC)和收集的洪水库存对模型结果进行了验证。AHP模型的AUC值为0.921,FR模型的AUC值为0.924,准确率分别为92.1%和92.4%。通过本研究,我们更深入地了解了水文地貌因素如何相互作用影响洪水易感性,强调了综合多准则和统计方法对准确的洪水风险制图的重要性。我们的方法提供了一个可转移的框架,可应用于不同的地理环境,有助于全球数据丰富和数据稀缺地区的防洪规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flood susceptibility assessment and mapping using GIS-based analytical hierarchy process and frequency ratio models
In this study, flood susceptibility maps were produced for district Nowshera by using Geographic Information System (GIS)-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Bivariate Statistical Frequency Ratio (FR) models. This study analyses twelve Hydro-geomorphological flood conditioning factors selected based on the scale and characteristics of the study area. These factors include elevation, slope, distance from the river, rainfall, drainage density, land use land cover (LULC), topographic wetness index (TWI), height above nearest drainage (HAND), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance from the road, curvature, and soil type. The weighted factors were then integrated using the weighted overlay technique in ArcGIS 10.8 to produce flood susceptibility maps, which were classified into five zones: very high, high, moderate, low, and very low susceptibility. The AHP model classified 145.1 km2 (8.34 %) and 252.2 km2 (14.49 %) of the area as very high and high flood susceptibility zones, respectively. While the FR model classified 94.6 km2 (5.4 %) as very high and 230.5 km2 (13.2 %) as high susceptibility zones. The models' results were validated using Receiver Operation Characteristics (ROC) Area Under Curve (AUC) and collected flood inventory. The calculated AUC values were 0.921 for the AHP model and 0.924 for the FR model, corresponding to accuracy of 92.1 % and 92.4 %, respectively. Through this study, we gained a deeper understanding of how hydro-geomorphological factors interact to influence flood susceptibility, emphasizing the importance of integrating multi-criteria and statistical approaches for accurate flood risk mapping. Our methodology provides a transferable framework that can be applied in diverse geographical contexts, aiding in flood mitigation planning for both data-rich and data-scarce regions worldwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global and Planetary Change
Global and Planetary Change 地学天文-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal Global and Planetary Change is to provide a multi-disciplinary overview of the processes taking place in the Earth System and involved in planetary change over time. The journal focuses on records of the past and current state of the earth system, and future scenarios , and their link to global environmental change. Regional or process-oriented studies are welcome if they discuss global implications. Topics include, but are not limited to, changes in the dynamics and composition of the atmosphere, oceans and cryosphere, as well as climate change, sea level variation, observations/modelling of Earth processes from deep to (near-)surface and their coupling, global ecology, biogeography and the resilience/thresholds in ecosystems. Key criteria for the consideration of manuscripts are (a) the relevance for the global scientific community and/or (b) the wider implications for global scale problems, preferably combined with (c) having a significance beyond a single discipline. A clear focus on key processes associated with planetary scale change is strongly encouraged. Manuscripts can be submitted as either research contributions or as a review article. Every effort should be made towards the presentation of research outcomes in an understandable way for a broad readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信