Andres F. Ortega , Joyce L. Marumo , Rebecca Coombe , Alexandria C. Benoit , Deborah A. Ross , Michael E. Van Amburgh
{"title":"氨基酸分析采用多时间点水解和非线性回归法测定生物标准、奶牛乳汁、组织、瘤胃微生物和各种饲料的氨基酸谱和21小时校正因子","authors":"Andres F. Ortega , Joyce L. Marumo , Rebecca Coombe , Alexandria C. Benoit , Deborah A. Ross , Michael E. Van Amburgh","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Data published over the last few years has demonstrated that the amino acids (AA) concentrations of milk and other substrates was not correctly described after the standard 21–24 h hydrolysis period, used to break down protein into its constituent AA, and that longer or shorter hydrolysis times might be needed for certain AA. The study objective was to determine the AA composition of ruminant tissue, milk, microbes, and feeds using multiple time-point hydrolysis and non-linear regression to establish optimal AA profiles and develop correction factors for single time-point hydrolysis. The AA were analyzed using this approach on sixteen feeds, nine cattle tissue samples, eight milk samples, and six ruminal microbial samples to represent both supply and requirement protein sources. Substrates were analyzed by HPLC-UV and/or HILIC-TQMS following hydrolysis at 110 °C in a block heater for 10–14 different time points ranging from 2 to 360 h using acid and alkaline hydrolysis. Following hydrolysis, least-squares non-linear regression was used to determine the true AA content. Many AA of all substrates continued to be released after the 24 h endpoint and were all observed to be declining by 360 h. The branched-chain AA (BCAA), Ser, Thr and Trp were found to need the highest correction due to hydrolysis loss or incomplete recovery, but most AA had some correction depending on the protein source. This leads to the conclusion that there is currently an underestimation of the AA concentration in ruminant substrates. Correction factors varied among protein substrates and trended or were significantly different for Ala, Arg, Asp, Glu, Trp, and Val (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.10). Protein-specific factors could help improve AA formulation for improved predictions of nutrient supply and requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"325 ","pages":"Article 116338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amino acid analysis using multiple time point hydrolysis and non-linear regression for determination of amino acid profiles and 21-hour correction factors of biological standards, and dairy cattle milk, tissue, rumen microbes, and various feeds\",\"authors\":\"Andres F. Ortega , Joyce L. Marumo , Rebecca Coombe , Alexandria C. Benoit , Deborah A. Ross , Michael E. Van Amburgh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Data published over the last few years has demonstrated that the amino acids (AA) concentrations of milk and other substrates was not correctly described after the standard 21–24 h hydrolysis period, used to break down protein into its constituent AA, and that longer or shorter hydrolysis times might be needed for certain AA. The study objective was to determine the AA composition of ruminant tissue, milk, microbes, and feeds using multiple time-point hydrolysis and non-linear regression to establish optimal AA profiles and develop correction factors for single time-point hydrolysis. The AA were analyzed using this approach on sixteen feeds, nine cattle tissue samples, eight milk samples, and six ruminal microbial samples to represent both supply and requirement protein sources. Substrates were analyzed by HPLC-UV and/or HILIC-TQMS following hydrolysis at 110 °C in a block heater for 10–14 different time points ranging from 2 to 360 h using acid and alkaline hydrolysis. Following hydrolysis, least-squares non-linear regression was used to determine the true AA content. Many AA of all substrates continued to be released after the 24 h endpoint and were all observed to be declining by 360 h. The branched-chain AA (BCAA), Ser, Thr and Trp were found to need the highest correction due to hydrolysis loss or incomplete recovery, but most AA had some correction depending on the protein source. This leads to the conclusion that there is currently an underestimation of the AA concentration in ruminant substrates. Correction factors varied among protein substrates and trended or were significantly different for Ala, Arg, Asp, Glu, Trp, and Val (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.10). Protein-specific factors could help improve AA formulation for improved predictions of nutrient supply and requirements.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"325 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001336\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Amino acid analysis using multiple time point hydrolysis and non-linear regression for determination of amino acid profiles and 21-hour correction factors of biological standards, and dairy cattle milk, tissue, rumen microbes, and various feeds
Data published over the last few years has demonstrated that the amino acids (AA) concentrations of milk and other substrates was not correctly described after the standard 21–24 h hydrolysis period, used to break down protein into its constituent AA, and that longer or shorter hydrolysis times might be needed for certain AA. The study objective was to determine the AA composition of ruminant tissue, milk, microbes, and feeds using multiple time-point hydrolysis and non-linear regression to establish optimal AA profiles and develop correction factors for single time-point hydrolysis. The AA were analyzed using this approach on sixteen feeds, nine cattle tissue samples, eight milk samples, and six ruminal microbial samples to represent both supply and requirement protein sources. Substrates were analyzed by HPLC-UV and/or HILIC-TQMS following hydrolysis at 110 °C in a block heater for 10–14 different time points ranging from 2 to 360 h using acid and alkaline hydrolysis. Following hydrolysis, least-squares non-linear regression was used to determine the true AA content. Many AA of all substrates continued to be released after the 24 h endpoint and were all observed to be declining by 360 h. The branched-chain AA (BCAA), Ser, Thr and Trp were found to need the highest correction due to hydrolysis loss or incomplete recovery, but most AA had some correction depending on the protein source. This leads to the conclusion that there is currently an underestimation of the AA concentration in ruminant substrates. Correction factors varied among protein substrates and trended or were significantly different for Ala, Arg, Asp, Glu, Trp, and Val (P ≤ 0.10). Protein-specific factors could help improve AA formulation for improved predictions of nutrient supply and requirements.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.