Shemanto Saha , Abu Kowsar , Sumon Chandra Debnath , Kawsar Ahmed , Firoz Alam
{"title":"孟加拉国绿色交通一体化光伏/沼气/风能/氢气多联产能源系统的技术经济分析","authors":"Shemanto Saha , Abu Kowsar , Sumon Chandra Debnath , Kawsar Ahmed , Firoz Alam","doi":"10.1016/j.ref.2025.100707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global transportation system is currently experiencing a notable shift towards the prominence of fully electric, hybrid, and hydrogen-fuelled vehicles to reduce the environmental consequences of fossil fuels. Developing countries, including Bangladesh, promote renewable energy-based power generation to foster the uptake of green transportation solutions. However, the implementation of such a solution poses significant economic, technical, and affordability challenges. This study explores the techno-economic viability of four potential options (Models): photovoltaic (PV), biogas, wind, and hydrogen energy within a net-metering scheme, an area not previously well explored for developing countries. The study findings reveal that Model 1 (PV/biogas) featuring electric vehicles (EVs) bears a cost of US$ 0.0141/km and demonstrates higher economic viability than the other three models. From an environmental standpoint, Model 3 (PV/biogas-powered hydrogen refuelling stations—HRFS) emerges as the optimal choice, characterised by a CO<sub>2</sub> emission of 1.83 g/km and the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and hydrogen production (LCOH<sub>P</sub>) values of US$ 13.4 and US$ 8.93, respectively. A sensitivity analysis of the PEM electrolyser price and gasification ratio estimates the LCOHp at US$ 8.63 to US$ 9.90. Environmental evaluations show that Models 3 and 4 can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from diesel, petrol, and CNG in Bangladesh’s transportation sector by approximately 99.5%. The study further reveals that EVs are deemed more economical than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles for green transportation for developing nations under the current cost structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29780,"journal":{"name":"Renewable Energy Focus","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 100707"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic analysis of integrated PV/Biogas/Wind/Hydrogen polygeneration energy systems for green transportation in Bangladesh context\",\"authors\":\"Shemanto Saha , Abu Kowsar , Sumon Chandra Debnath , Kawsar Ahmed , Firoz Alam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ref.2025.100707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global transportation system is currently experiencing a notable shift towards the prominence of fully electric, hybrid, and hydrogen-fuelled vehicles to reduce the environmental consequences of fossil fuels. Developing countries, including Bangladesh, promote renewable energy-based power generation to foster the uptake of green transportation solutions. However, the implementation of such a solution poses significant economic, technical, and affordability challenges. This study explores the techno-economic viability of four potential options (Models): photovoltaic (PV), biogas, wind, and hydrogen energy within a net-metering scheme, an area not previously well explored for developing countries. The study findings reveal that Model 1 (PV/biogas) featuring electric vehicles (EVs) bears a cost of US$ 0.0141/km and demonstrates higher economic viability than the other three models. From an environmental standpoint, Model 3 (PV/biogas-powered hydrogen refuelling stations—HRFS) emerges as the optimal choice, characterised by a CO<sub>2</sub> emission of 1.83 g/km and the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and hydrogen production (LCOH<sub>P</sub>) values of US$ 13.4 and US$ 8.93, respectively. A sensitivity analysis of the PEM electrolyser price and gasification ratio estimates the LCOHp at US$ 8.63 to US$ 9.90. Environmental evaluations show that Models 3 and 4 can reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from diesel, petrol, and CNG in Bangladesh’s transportation sector by approximately 99.5%. The study further reveals that EVs are deemed more economical than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles for green transportation for developing nations under the current cost structure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable Energy Focus\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100707\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable Energy Focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008425000298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable Energy Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755008425000298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Techno-economic analysis of integrated PV/Biogas/Wind/Hydrogen polygeneration energy systems for green transportation in Bangladesh context
The global transportation system is currently experiencing a notable shift towards the prominence of fully electric, hybrid, and hydrogen-fuelled vehicles to reduce the environmental consequences of fossil fuels. Developing countries, including Bangladesh, promote renewable energy-based power generation to foster the uptake of green transportation solutions. However, the implementation of such a solution poses significant economic, technical, and affordability challenges. This study explores the techno-economic viability of four potential options (Models): photovoltaic (PV), biogas, wind, and hydrogen energy within a net-metering scheme, an area not previously well explored for developing countries. The study findings reveal that Model 1 (PV/biogas) featuring electric vehicles (EVs) bears a cost of US$ 0.0141/km and demonstrates higher economic viability than the other three models. From an environmental standpoint, Model 3 (PV/biogas-powered hydrogen refuelling stations—HRFS) emerges as the optimal choice, characterised by a CO2 emission of 1.83 g/km and the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) and hydrogen production (LCOHP) values of US$ 13.4 and US$ 8.93, respectively. A sensitivity analysis of the PEM electrolyser price and gasification ratio estimates the LCOHp at US$ 8.63 to US$ 9.90. Environmental evaluations show that Models 3 and 4 can reduce CO2 emissions from diesel, petrol, and CNG in Bangladesh’s transportation sector by approximately 99.5%. The study further reveals that EVs are deemed more economical than hydrogen fuel cell vehicles for green transportation for developing nations under the current cost structure.