建筑物室内环境质量与生产率之间的评估:系统文献综述

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Mateus Pedrosa Braga, Iasmin Lourenço Niza, Evandro Eduardo Broday
{"title":"建筑物室内环境质量与生产率之间的评估:系统文献综述","authors":"Mateus Pedrosa Braga,&nbsp;Iasmin Lourenço Niza,&nbsp;Evandro Eduardo Broday","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to changes in people's living and working patterns, studies into indoor environmental quality (IEQ) have become increasingly relevant due to their influence on people's health, comfort and, above all, productivity. By selecting studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), this study carried out a literature review to identify the main models that assess people's productivity based on the four tangible aspects of IEQ (indoor air quality, thermal, acoustic and visual comfort). Three research questions were answered after using bibliometric analysis, hierarchical clustering, and meta-analysis. The main conclusions of this study are: (i) Seventy-three productivity models related to aspects of IEQ were identified, involving twenty-four different parameters, the temperature being the most recurrent one in the predictive models; (ii) The dendrogram, generated by the hierarchical clustering, formed six different groups, where parameters related to thermal comfort and indoor air quality remaining together; (iii) After analyzing the main characteristics of each model, verifying their main strengths and weaknesses, it was verified that the representativeness of the sample, climatic and cultural biases, psychosocial factors, subjective perceptions and the scope of the IEQ aspects, the data collection methodology and statistical validation are determining factors for the reliability of the models. (iv) Meta-analysis consolidated studies on the correlation of productivity models, revealing a predominance of positive correlations but with high heterogeneity (I² = 98.39 %). This suggests a publication bias, suggesting an under-representation of non-significant or negative results. The presence of this variation reflects the need to consider contextual factors when discussing IEQ aspects, which can depend on local characteristics, cultural expectations and occupants' habits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"278 ","pages":"Article 112983"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment between indoor environmental quality aspects and productivity in buildings: a systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Mateus Pedrosa Braga,&nbsp;Iasmin Lourenço Niza,&nbsp;Evandro Eduardo Broday\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Due to changes in people's living and working patterns, studies into indoor environmental quality (IEQ) have become increasingly relevant due to their influence on people's health, comfort and, above all, productivity. By selecting studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), this study carried out a literature review to identify the main models that assess people's productivity based on the four tangible aspects of IEQ (indoor air quality, thermal, acoustic and visual comfort). Three research questions were answered after using bibliometric analysis, hierarchical clustering, and meta-analysis. The main conclusions of this study are: (i) Seventy-three productivity models related to aspects of IEQ were identified, involving twenty-four different parameters, the temperature being the most recurrent one in the predictive models; (ii) The dendrogram, generated by the hierarchical clustering, formed six different groups, where parameters related to thermal comfort and indoor air quality remaining together; (iii) After analyzing the main characteristics of each model, verifying their main strengths and weaknesses, it was verified that the representativeness of the sample, climatic and cultural biases, psychosocial factors, subjective perceptions and the scope of the IEQ aspects, the data collection methodology and statistical validation are determining factors for the reliability of the models. (iv) Meta-analysis consolidated studies on the correlation of productivity models, revealing a predominance of positive correlations but with high heterogeneity (I² = 98.39 %). This suggests a publication bias, suggesting an under-representation of non-significant or negative results. The presence of this variation reflects the need to consider contextual factors when discussing IEQ aspects, which can depend on local characteristics, cultural expectations and occupants' habits.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":\"278 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004640\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004640","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于人们的生活和工作模式发生了变化,室内环境质量(IEQ)对人们的健康、舒适度,尤其是工作效率的影响越来越大,因此对室内环境质量的研究也变得越来越重要。通过使用系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)来选择研究,本研究进行了文献综述,以确定根据室内环境质量的四个有形方面(室内空气质量、热舒适度、声舒适度和视觉舒适度)来评估人们工作效率的主要模型。通过文献计量分析、层次聚类和荟萃分析,回答了三个研究问题。本研究的主要结论如下(i) 确定了 73 个与室内环境质量相关的生产率模型,涉及 24 个不同参数,其中温度是预测模型中最常见的参数;(ii) 通过分层聚类生成的树枝图形成了六个不同的组,其中与热舒适度和室内空气质量相关的参数仍然在一起;(iii) 在分析了每个模型的主要特点、验证了其主要优缺点之后,证实样本的代表性、 气候和文化偏差、社会心理因素、主观看法和室内环境质量的范围、数据收集方 法和统计验证是模型可靠性的决定因素。(iv) 元分析综合了有关生产率模型相关性的研究,发现正相关性占主导地位,但异质性很高(I² = 98.39 %)。这表明存在出版偏差,非显著或负面结果的代表性不足。这种差异的存在反映出在讨论综合环境质量问题时需要考虑环境因素,这可能取决于当地特点、文化期望和居住者的习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment between indoor environmental quality aspects and productivity in buildings: a systematic literature review
Due to changes in people's living and working patterns, studies into indoor environmental quality (IEQ) have become increasingly relevant due to their influence on people's health, comfort and, above all, productivity. By selecting studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), this study carried out a literature review to identify the main models that assess people's productivity based on the four tangible aspects of IEQ (indoor air quality, thermal, acoustic and visual comfort). Three research questions were answered after using bibliometric analysis, hierarchical clustering, and meta-analysis. The main conclusions of this study are: (i) Seventy-three productivity models related to aspects of IEQ were identified, involving twenty-four different parameters, the temperature being the most recurrent one in the predictive models; (ii) The dendrogram, generated by the hierarchical clustering, formed six different groups, where parameters related to thermal comfort and indoor air quality remaining together; (iii) After analyzing the main characteristics of each model, verifying their main strengths and weaknesses, it was verified that the representativeness of the sample, climatic and cultural biases, psychosocial factors, subjective perceptions and the scope of the IEQ aspects, the data collection methodology and statistical validation are determining factors for the reliability of the models. (iv) Meta-analysis consolidated studies on the correlation of productivity models, revealing a predominance of positive correlations but with high heterogeneity (I² = 98.39 %). This suggests a publication bias, suggesting an under-representation of non-significant or negative results. The presence of this variation reflects the need to consider contextual factors when discussing IEQ aspects, which can depend on local characteristics, cultural expectations and occupants' habits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信