再生砖粉替代全再生地聚合物前驱体和砂的升级利用:从微观到宏观

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Zhiming Ma , Yuanhui Wu , Dingyi Yang , Kun Fang , Shaodan Hou , Yunyun Dai , Changqing Wang
{"title":"再生砖粉替代全再生地聚合物前驱体和砂的升级利用:从微观到宏观","authors":"Zhiming Ma ,&nbsp;Yuanhui Wu ,&nbsp;Dingyi Yang ,&nbsp;Kun Fang ,&nbsp;Shaodan Hou ,&nbsp;Yunyun Dai ,&nbsp;Changqing Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Upcycling of recycled brick powder (RBP) as an eco-friendly precursor for sustainable geopolymer is an effective pathway for the high-value recycling of clay brick waste. This study investigates the feasibility of preparing completely recycled geopolymer by substituting RBP for both FA-GGBS precursors and river sand (RS), aiming to optimize the RBP substitution method and percentages to achieve a sustainable geopolymer with high performance, as well as to reduce the demand for precursors and RS. RBP exhibits certain alkali-activation reactivity and favorable micro-aggregate filling effects, demonstrating the potential to simultaneously replace both the precursor and aggregate. Substituting a high proportion of RBP for precursors is detrimental to the geopolymerization reaction, resulting in a deterioration in the micro-macro properties of geopolymer. However, replacing an appropriate amount of RS with RBP can refine the microstructure and enhance the mechanical strength and permeability resistance of geopolymer. At an appropriate substitution rate of RBP, the positive effects of replacing RS with RBP on the geopolymer performance can offset the adverse effects of replacing precursors with RBP. By optimizing the RBP substitution percentages for precursors and RS, completely recycled geopolymer meeting various performance requirements can be prepared. When the RBP substitution rate for precursor-RS is 0 %-0 %, 30 %-0 %, 0 %-30 %, 30 %-30 %, and 50 %-50 %, the 28-day compressive strengths of the blending geopolymer are 69.0, 63.3, 78.1, 67.4, and 55.0 MPa, respectively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"476 ","pages":"Article 141300"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upcycling of recycled brick powder as a substitute for precursor and sand in completely recycled geopolymer: From micro to macro perspective\",\"authors\":\"Zhiming Ma ,&nbsp;Yuanhui Wu ,&nbsp;Dingyi Yang ,&nbsp;Kun Fang ,&nbsp;Shaodan Hou ,&nbsp;Yunyun Dai ,&nbsp;Changqing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Upcycling of recycled brick powder (RBP) as an eco-friendly precursor for sustainable geopolymer is an effective pathway for the high-value recycling of clay brick waste. This study investigates the feasibility of preparing completely recycled geopolymer by substituting RBP for both FA-GGBS precursors and river sand (RS), aiming to optimize the RBP substitution method and percentages to achieve a sustainable geopolymer with high performance, as well as to reduce the demand for precursors and RS. RBP exhibits certain alkali-activation reactivity and favorable micro-aggregate filling effects, demonstrating the potential to simultaneously replace both the precursor and aggregate. Substituting a high proportion of RBP for precursors is detrimental to the geopolymerization reaction, resulting in a deterioration in the micro-macro properties of geopolymer. However, replacing an appropriate amount of RS with RBP can refine the microstructure and enhance the mechanical strength and permeability resistance of geopolymer. At an appropriate substitution rate of RBP, the positive effects of replacing RS with RBP on the geopolymer performance can offset the adverse effects of replacing precursors with RBP. By optimizing the RBP substitution percentages for precursors and RS, completely recycled geopolymer meeting various performance requirements can be prepared. When the RBP substitution rate for precursor-RS is 0 %-0 %, 30 %-0 %, 0 %-30 %, 30 %-30 %, and 50 %-50 %, the 28-day compressive strengths of the blending geopolymer are 69.0, 63.3, 78.1, 67.4, and 55.0 MPa, respectively.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"476 \",\"pages\":\"Article 141300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825014485\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825014485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

再生砖粉(RBP)作为可持续地聚合物的环保前驱体,其升级利用是高价值回收粘土砖废弃物的有效途径。本研究探讨了用RBP替代FA-GGBS前驱体和河砂(RS)制备完全再生地聚合物的可行性,旨在优化RBP替代方法和比例,以获得高性能的可持续地聚合物,同时减少对前驱体和RS的需求。RBP具有一定的碱活化反应性和良好的微骨料填充效果。展示了同时取代前体和聚集体的潜力。高比例的RBP取代前驱体不利于地聚合反应,导致地聚合物的微观宏观性能恶化。然而,用RBP代替适量的RS可以细化地聚合物的微观结构,提高其机械强度和抗渗性。在适当的RBP取代率下,用RBP取代RS对地聚合物性能的积极影响可以抵消用RBP取代前驱体的不利影响。通过优化RBP对前驱体和RS的取代率,可以制备出满足各种性能要求的完全可回收的地聚合物。当RBP precursor-RS替代率是0 % 0 %,30  % % 0,0 % -30 %,30 % -30 %,和50 % -50 %,28天抗压混合地质聚合物的优点是69.0,63.3,78.1,67.4,和55.0 MPa,分别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Upcycling of recycled brick powder as a substitute for precursor and sand in completely recycled geopolymer: From micro to macro perspective
Upcycling of recycled brick powder (RBP) as an eco-friendly precursor for sustainable geopolymer is an effective pathway for the high-value recycling of clay brick waste. This study investigates the feasibility of preparing completely recycled geopolymer by substituting RBP for both FA-GGBS precursors and river sand (RS), aiming to optimize the RBP substitution method and percentages to achieve a sustainable geopolymer with high performance, as well as to reduce the demand for precursors and RS. RBP exhibits certain alkali-activation reactivity and favorable micro-aggregate filling effects, demonstrating the potential to simultaneously replace both the precursor and aggregate. Substituting a high proportion of RBP for precursors is detrimental to the geopolymerization reaction, resulting in a deterioration in the micro-macro properties of geopolymer. However, replacing an appropriate amount of RS with RBP can refine the microstructure and enhance the mechanical strength and permeability resistance of geopolymer. At an appropriate substitution rate of RBP, the positive effects of replacing RS with RBP on the geopolymer performance can offset the adverse effects of replacing precursors with RBP. By optimizing the RBP substitution percentages for precursors and RS, completely recycled geopolymer meeting various performance requirements can be prepared. When the RBP substitution rate for precursor-RS is 0 %-0 %, 30 %-0 %, 0 %-30 %, 30 %-30 %, and 50 %-50 %, the 28-day compressive strengths of the blending geopolymer are 69.0, 63.3, 78.1, 67.4, and 55.0 MPa, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信