对欧洲银行市净率下降的综合分析

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
S. Markoulis , S. Martzoukos , S. Savvas , V. Zagkreos
{"title":"对欧洲银行市净率下降的综合分析","authors":"S. Markoulis ,&nbsp;S. Martzoukos ,&nbsp;S. Savvas ,&nbsp;V. Zagkreos","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We analyse a sample of 215 European banks and find that their market-to-book ratio has declined substantially since the GFC. To assess what may account for this, bank-specific and country-specific indicators are used, as well as, for the first time for European banks, ESG variables. We find bank fundamentals, such as ROE and volatility of stock returns to be important determinants of the market-to-book ratio. We also find the valuation of large banks to be penalized more, relative to that of smaller ones. On the country-specific front, we find GDP growth to be significant, as well as the relative size of the banking sector. As far as ESG is concerned, we find different ESG sub-pillars to affect bank valuation differently, more specifically, we find a positive relationship between duality and valuation, particularly for large banks, and a negative one for environmental engagement, the latter being suggestive of the ‘over-investment’ hypothesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 104107"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive analysis of the decline in the market-to-book ratio of European banks\",\"authors\":\"S. Markoulis ,&nbsp;S. Martzoukos ,&nbsp;S. Savvas ,&nbsp;V. Zagkreos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We analyse a sample of 215 European banks and find that their market-to-book ratio has declined substantially since the GFC. To assess what may account for this, bank-specific and country-specific indicators are used, as well as, for the first time for European banks, ESG variables. We find bank fundamentals, such as ROE and volatility of stock returns to be important determinants of the market-to-book ratio. We also find the valuation of large banks to be penalized more, relative to that of smaller ones. On the country-specific front, we find GDP growth to be significant, as well as the relative size of the banking sector. As far as ESG is concerned, we find different ESG sub-pillars to affect bank valuation differently, more specifically, we find a positive relationship between duality and valuation, particularly for large banks, and a negative one for environmental engagement, the latter being suggestive of the ‘over-investment’ hypothesis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025002709\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025002709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了215家欧洲银行的样本,发现自全球金融危机以来,它们的市净率大幅下降。为了评估可能造成这种情况的原因,我们使用了针对银行和国家的指标,并首次对欧洲银行使用了ESG变量。我们发现银行的基本面,如ROE和股票回报的波动性是市净率的重要决定因素。我们还发现,相对于规模较小的银行,大型银行的估值受到的影响更大。在具体国家方面,我们发现GDP增长显著,银行业的相对规模也显著。就ESG而言,我们发现不同的ESG子支柱对银行估值的影响不同,更具体地说,我们发现二元性和估值之间存在正相关关系,特别是对大型银行而言,而环境参与则存在负相关关系,后者暗示了“过度投资”假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive analysis of the decline in the market-to-book ratio of European banks
We analyse a sample of 215 European banks and find that their market-to-book ratio has declined substantially since the GFC. To assess what may account for this, bank-specific and country-specific indicators are used, as well as, for the first time for European banks, ESG variables. We find bank fundamentals, such as ROE and volatility of stock returns to be important determinants of the market-to-book ratio. We also find the valuation of large banks to be penalized more, relative to that of smaller ones. On the country-specific front, we find GDP growth to be significant, as well as the relative size of the banking sector. As far as ESG is concerned, we find different ESG sub-pillars to affect bank valuation differently, more specifically, we find a positive relationship between duality and valuation, particularly for large banks, and a negative one for environmental engagement, the latter being suggestive of the ‘over-investment’ hypothesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信