机器人辅助与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的十年对比(短期 RESOLUTION)

Rauand Duhoky, Ritch T J Geitenbeek, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Thijs A Burghgraef, Christina A Fleming, Shamsul Masum, Adrian Hopgood, Timothy Rockall, Quentin Denost, Christophe Taoum, Roel Hompes, Jim Briggs, Esther C J Consten, Jim S Khan
{"title":"机器人辅助与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的十年对比(短期 RESOLUTION)","authors":"Rauand Duhoky, Ritch T J Geitenbeek, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Thijs A Burghgraef, Christina A Fleming, Shamsul Masum, Adrian Hopgood, Timothy Rockall, Quentin Denost, Christophe Taoum, Roel Hompes, Jim Briggs, Esther C J Consten, Jim S Khan","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard for rectal cancer surgery, with laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches commonly employed. While robot-assisted surgery may offer technical advantages, there is limited evidence comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques, particularly in Western European populations. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Methods This multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study included 1749 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted total mesorectal excision from January 2014 to January 2024. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to minimise confounding. Primary outcomes were length of stay, operative time, and conversion rates. Secondary outcomes included complications and pathological outcomes within 90 days, and readmissions and reinterventions within 30 days. Results The final cohort included 680.9 laparoscopic and 1057.5 robot-assisted cases after weighting. Robot-assisted surgery showed lower conversion rates (6.1% vs 3.5%, p = .025), higher rates of primary anastomosis (80.1% vs 92.1%, p < .001), and fewer stoma formations (78.4% vs 63.7%, p < .001). Pathological outcomes indicated a higher rate of complete mesorectal excision in the robot-assisted group (77.2% vs 86.0%, p < .001), though this data was not available for all centres. Operative time was longer in the robot-assisted cohort (181.0 vs 220.0 minutes, p < .001), but no significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, length of stay, anastomotic leakage or 30-day reintervention rates. Conclusion Robot-assisted surgery low anterior resection demonstrated improved short-term outcomes with lower conversion rates, higher rates of complete mesorectal excision, and higher restorative procedure rates, which may influence longer-term oncological and patient quality of life outcomes. Trial registration https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN75281193","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten years of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (short-term RESOLUTION)\",\"authors\":\"Rauand Duhoky, Ritch T J Geitenbeek, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Thijs A Burghgraef, Christina A Fleming, Shamsul Masum, Adrian Hopgood, Timothy Rockall, Quentin Denost, Christophe Taoum, Roel Hompes, Jim Briggs, Esther C J Consten, Jim S Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djaf084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard for rectal cancer surgery, with laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches commonly employed. While robot-assisted surgery may offer technical advantages, there is limited evidence comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques, particularly in Western European populations. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Methods This multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study included 1749 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted total mesorectal excision from January 2014 to January 2024. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to minimise confounding. Primary outcomes were length of stay, operative time, and conversion rates. Secondary outcomes included complications and pathological outcomes within 90 days, and readmissions and reinterventions within 30 days. Results The final cohort included 680.9 laparoscopic and 1057.5 robot-assisted cases after weighting. Robot-assisted surgery showed lower conversion rates (6.1% vs 3.5%, p = .025), higher rates of primary anastomosis (80.1% vs 92.1%, p < .001), and fewer stoma formations (78.4% vs 63.7%, p < .001). Pathological outcomes indicated a higher rate of complete mesorectal excision in the robot-assisted group (77.2% vs 86.0%, p < .001), though this data was not available for all centres. Operative time was longer in the robot-assisted cohort (181.0 vs 220.0 minutes, p < .001), but no significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, length of stay, anastomotic leakage or 30-day reintervention rates. Conclusion Robot-assisted surgery low anterior resection demonstrated improved short-term outcomes with lower conversion rates, higher rates of complete mesorectal excision, and higher restorative procedure rates, which may influence longer-term oncological and patient quality of life outcomes. Trial registration https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN75281193\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全肠系膜切除是直肠癌手术的金标准,腹腔镜和机器人辅助的方法通常被采用。虽然机器人辅助手术可能具有技术优势,但比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助技术的短期效果的证据有限,特别是在西欧人群中。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜与机器人辅助的直肠癌全肠系膜切除术的短期效果。方法这项多中心、国际、回顾性队列研究纳入了2014年1月至2024年1月期间接受腹腔镜或机器人辅助全肠系膜切除术的1749例患者。应用处理加权逆概率来最小化混淆。主要结果为住院时间、手术时间和转换率。次要结局包括90天内的并发症和病理结局,以及30天内的再入院和再干预。结果加权后的最终队列包括680.9例腹腔镜手术和1057.5例机器人辅助手术。机器人辅助手术的转换率较低(6.1%对3.5%,p = 0.025),初级吻合率较高(80.1%对92.1%,p <;.001),较少的造口形成(78.4% vs 63.7%, p <;措施)。病理结果显示,机器人辅助组的直肠系膜完全切除率更高(77.2% vs 86.0%, p <;.001),但该数据并非适用于所有中心。机器人辅助组的手术时间更长(181.0分钟vs 220.0分钟,p <;.001),但在术后并发症、住院时间、吻合口瘘或30天再干预率方面无显著差异。结论机器人辅助低位前切除术具有较低的转换率、较高的全肠系膜切除率和较高的修复手术率,可改善短期预后,这可能影响长期肿瘤预后和患者生活质量。试验注册https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN75281193
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten years of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (short-term RESOLUTION)
Background Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard for rectal cancer surgery, with laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches commonly employed. While robot-assisted surgery may offer technical advantages, there is limited evidence comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques, particularly in Western European populations. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Methods This multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study included 1749 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted total mesorectal excision from January 2014 to January 2024. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to minimise confounding. Primary outcomes were length of stay, operative time, and conversion rates. Secondary outcomes included complications and pathological outcomes within 90 days, and readmissions and reinterventions within 30 days. Results The final cohort included 680.9 laparoscopic and 1057.5 robot-assisted cases after weighting. Robot-assisted surgery showed lower conversion rates (6.1% vs 3.5%, p = .025), higher rates of primary anastomosis (80.1% vs 92.1%, p &lt; .001), and fewer stoma formations (78.4% vs 63.7%, p &lt; .001). Pathological outcomes indicated a higher rate of complete mesorectal excision in the robot-assisted group (77.2% vs 86.0%, p &lt; .001), though this data was not available for all centres. Operative time was longer in the robot-assisted cohort (181.0 vs 220.0 minutes, p &lt; .001), but no significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, length of stay, anastomotic leakage or 30-day reintervention rates. Conclusion Robot-assisted surgery low anterior resection demonstrated improved short-term outcomes with lower conversion rates, higher rates of complete mesorectal excision, and higher restorative procedure rates, which may influence longer-term oncological and patient quality of life outcomes. Trial registration https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN75281193
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信