基于深度学习的液体细胞学模型用于宫颈癌前病变和癌症检测

IF 15.7 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Peng Xue, Le Dang, Ling-Hua Kong, Hong-Ping Tang, Hai-Miao Xu, Hai-Yan Weng, Zhe Wang, Rong-Gan Wei, Lian Xu, Hong-Xia Li, Hai-Yan Niu, Ming-Juan Wang, Zi-Chen Ye, Zhi-Fang Li, Wen Chen, Qin-Jing Pan, Xun Zhang, Remila Rezhake, Li Zhang, Yu Jiang, You-Lin Qiao, Lan Zhu, Fang-Hui Zhao
{"title":"基于深度学习的液体细胞学模型用于宫颈癌前病变和癌症检测","authors":"Peng Xue, Le Dang, Ling-Hua Kong, Hong-Ping Tang, Hai-Miao Xu, Hai-Yan Weng, Zhe Wang, Rong-Gan Wei, Lian Xu, Hong-Xia Li, Hai-Yan Niu, Ming-Juan Wang, Zi-Chen Ye, Zhi-Fang Li, Wen Chen, Qin-Jing Pan, Xun Zhang, Remila Rezhake, Li Zhang, Yu Jiang, You-Lin Qiao, Lan Zhu, Fang-Hui Zhao","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-58883-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Deep learning (DL) enabled liquid-based cytology has potential for cervical cancer screening or triage. Here, we develop a DL model using whole cytology slides from 17,397 women and test it on 10,826 additional cases through a three-stage process. The DL model achieves robust performance across nine hospitals. In a multi-reader, multi-case study, it outperforms cytopathologists’ sensitivity by 9%. Reading time significantly decreases with DL assistance (218s vs 30s; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). In community-based organized screening, the DL model’s sensitivity matches that of senior cytopathologists (0.878 vs 0.854; <i>p</i> &gt; 0.999), yet it has reduced specificity (0.831 vs 0.901; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Notably, hospital-based opportunistic screening shows that junior cytopathologists with DL assistance significantly improve both their sensitivity and specificity (0.857 vs 0.657, 0.840 vs 0.737; both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). When triaging human papillomavirus-positive cases, DL assistance exhibits better performance than junior cytopathologists alone. These findings support using the DL model as an assistance tool in cervical screening and case triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning enabled liquid-based cytology model for cervical precancer and cancer detection\",\"authors\":\"Peng Xue, Le Dang, Ling-Hua Kong, Hong-Ping Tang, Hai-Miao Xu, Hai-Yan Weng, Zhe Wang, Rong-Gan Wei, Lian Xu, Hong-Xia Li, Hai-Yan Niu, Ming-Juan Wang, Zi-Chen Ye, Zhi-Fang Li, Wen Chen, Qin-Jing Pan, Xun Zhang, Remila Rezhake, Li Zhang, Yu Jiang, You-Lin Qiao, Lan Zhu, Fang-Hui Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41467-025-58883-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Deep learning (DL) enabled liquid-based cytology has potential for cervical cancer screening or triage. Here, we develop a DL model using whole cytology slides from 17,397 women and test it on 10,826 additional cases through a three-stage process. The DL model achieves robust performance across nine hospitals. In a multi-reader, multi-case study, it outperforms cytopathologists’ sensitivity by 9%. Reading time significantly decreases with DL assistance (218s vs 30s; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). In community-based organized screening, the DL model’s sensitivity matches that of senior cytopathologists (0.878 vs 0.854; <i>p</i> &gt; 0.999), yet it has reduced specificity (0.831 vs 0.901; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Notably, hospital-based opportunistic screening shows that junior cytopathologists with DL assistance significantly improve both their sensitivity and specificity (0.857 vs 0.657, 0.840 vs 0.737; both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). When triaging human papillomavirus-positive cases, DL assistance exhibits better performance than junior cytopathologists alone. These findings support using the DL model as an assistance tool in cervical screening and case triage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Communications\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58883-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58883-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于深度学习(DL)的液体细胞学有可能用于宫颈癌筛查或分诊。在这里,我们使用来自17,397名女性的全细胞学切片开发了DL模型,并通过三个阶段的过程对10,826例其他病例进行了测试。DL模型在9家医院中实现了稳健的性能。在多读者、多案例研究中,它比细胞病理学家的灵敏度高出9%。阅读时间在DL辅助下显著缩短(218s vs 30s);p < 0.0001)。在以社区为基础的组织筛查中,DL模型的敏感性与资深细胞病理学家相匹配(0.878 vs 0.854;P > 0.999),但特异性降低(0.831 vs 0.901;p < 0.0001)。值得注意的是,基于医院的机会性筛查显示,DL辅助下的初级细胞病理学家的敏感性和特异性均显著提高(0.857 vs 0.657, 0.840 vs 0.737;p < 0.0001)。在鉴别人乳头瘤病毒阳性病例时,DL辅助比单独的初级细胞病理学家表现更好。这些发现支持使用DL模型作为子宫颈筛查和病例分诊的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep learning enabled liquid-based cytology model for cervical precancer and cancer detection

Deep learning enabled liquid-based cytology model for cervical precancer and cancer detection

Deep learning (DL) enabled liquid-based cytology has potential for cervical cancer screening or triage. Here, we develop a DL model using whole cytology slides from 17,397 women and test it on 10,826 additional cases through a three-stage process. The DL model achieves robust performance across nine hospitals. In a multi-reader, multi-case study, it outperforms cytopathologists’ sensitivity by 9%. Reading time significantly decreases with DL assistance (218s vs 30s; p < 0.0001). In community-based organized screening, the DL model’s sensitivity matches that of senior cytopathologists (0.878 vs 0.854; p > 0.999), yet it has reduced specificity (0.831 vs 0.901; p < 0.0001). Notably, hospital-based opportunistic screening shows that junior cytopathologists with DL assistance significantly improve both their sensitivity and specificity (0.857 vs 0.657, 0.840 vs 0.737; both p < 0.0001). When triaging human papillomavirus-positive cases, DL assistance exhibits better performance than junior cytopathologists alone. These findings support using the DL model as an assistance tool in cervical screening and case triage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Communications
Nature Communications Biological Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
6928
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信