蒙大拿州半干旱地区土壤健康对覆盖作物功能群和丰富度的响应

Clain A. Jones, Catherine A. Zabinski, Perry R. Miller, Kristen D'Agati, Susan M. Tallman, Megan L. Housman
{"title":"蒙大拿州半干旱地区土壤健康对覆盖作物功能群和丰富度的响应","authors":"Clain A. Jones,&nbsp;Catherine A. Zabinski,&nbsp;Perry R. Miller,&nbsp;Kristen D'Agati,&nbsp;Susan M. Tallman,&nbsp;Megan L. Housman","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite a plethora of studies on the effects of cover crops on soil health, few published papers have reported the effects of plant functional group and richness on soil health, especially in semiarid regions. We initiated a no-till study in semiarid Montana in 2012 that consisted of Pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.), four two-spp single functional groups (Brassica, Fibrous-rooted, Legumes, and Tap-rooted), four three-functional group mixes, a four-functional group mix (Full), and a summer fallow control (Fallow). Cover crops were terminated with herbicide when pea was at first flower stage, and wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) was grown after each cover crop at three nitrogen (N) rates. After four cover crop cycles, soil in both Pea and Full had greater soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (STN), and potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) than Fallow, but Pea, Full, and Fallow treatments did not differ in infiltration rate, penetration resistance, or soil enzyme activity. There were few differences in soil health parameters between Pea and Full, and among functional groups. Soil in the three-functional group treatments had 20%–35% greater PMN than in the one-functional group treatments (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), yet SOC and STN were not affected by functional richness. Nitrogen rate did not affect SOC, STN, or PMN. Concentrations of SOC were weakly related (<i>R</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0.05–0.14, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) with 7-year aboveground biomass returned, suggesting practices that increase residue amounts might be more important to SOC and other soil health parameters than functional group or richness.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil health responses to cover crop functional group and richness in semiarid Montana\",\"authors\":\"Clain A. Jones,&nbsp;Catherine A. Zabinski,&nbsp;Perry R. Miller,&nbsp;Kristen D'Agati,&nbsp;Susan M. Tallman,&nbsp;Megan L. Housman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/saj2.70045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Despite a plethora of studies on the effects of cover crops on soil health, few published papers have reported the effects of plant functional group and richness on soil health, especially in semiarid regions. We initiated a no-till study in semiarid Montana in 2012 that consisted of Pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.), four two-spp single functional groups (Brassica, Fibrous-rooted, Legumes, and Tap-rooted), four three-functional group mixes, a four-functional group mix (Full), and a summer fallow control (Fallow). Cover crops were terminated with herbicide when pea was at first flower stage, and wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) was grown after each cover crop at three nitrogen (N) rates. After four cover crop cycles, soil in both Pea and Full had greater soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (STN), and potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) than Fallow, but Pea, Full, and Fallow treatments did not differ in infiltration rate, penetration resistance, or soil enzyme activity. There were few differences in soil health parameters between Pea and Full, and among functional groups. Soil in the three-functional group treatments had 20%–35% greater PMN than in the one-functional group treatments (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), yet SOC and STN were not affected by functional richness. Nitrogen rate did not affect SOC, STN, or PMN. Concentrations of SOC were weakly related (<i>R</i><sup>2 </sup>= 0.05–0.14, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) with 7-year aboveground biomass returned, suggesting practices that increase residue amounts might be more important to SOC and other soil health parameters than functional group or richness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"volume\":\"89 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70045\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管关于覆盖作物对土壤健康影响的研究很多,但很少有论文报道植物功能群和丰富度对土壤健康的影响,特别是在半干旱地区。2012年,我们在半干旱的蒙大拿州启动了一项免耕研究,包括豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)、4个2种单功能组(芸芥、纤维根、豆科和Tap-rooted)、4个3功能组组合、1个4功能组组合(Full)和一个夏季休耕对照(fallow)。在豌豆初花期终止覆盖作物,小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)在每个覆盖作物之后以三种氮(N)水平种植。经过4个覆盖作物周期后,豌豆和休耕处理的土壤有机碳(SOC)、土壤全氮(STN)和潜在矿化氮(PMN)均高于休耕处理,但豌豆、全耕和休耕处理在入渗速率、抗渗透能力和土壤酶活性方面没有差异。豌豆与全豆、功能群间土壤健康参数差异不大。3个功能组处理的土壤PMN比1个功能组处理高20% ~ 35% (p <;0.05),但SOC和STN不受功能丰富度的影响。施氮量不影响SOC、STN和PMN。土壤有机碳浓度呈弱相关(R2 = 0.05-0.14, p <;0.05),表明增加残量的做法对土壤有机碳和其他健康参数的影响可能比功能群或丰富度更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Soil health responses to cover crop functional group and richness in semiarid Montana

Soil health responses to cover crop functional group and richness in semiarid Montana

Soil health responses to cover crop functional group and richness in semiarid Montana

Soil health responses to cover crop functional group and richness in semiarid Montana

Soil health responses to cover crop functional group and richness in semiarid Montana

Despite a plethora of studies on the effects of cover crops on soil health, few published papers have reported the effects of plant functional group and richness on soil health, especially in semiarid regions. We initiated a no-till study in semiarid Montana in 2012 that consisted of Pea (Pisum sativum L.), four two-spp single functional groups (Brassica, Fibrous-rooted, Legumes, and Tap-rooted), four three-functional group mixes, a four-functional group mix (Full), and a summer fallow control (Fallow). Cover crops were terminated with herbicide when pea was at first flower stage, and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was grown after each cover crop at three nitrogen (N) rates. After four cover crop cycles, soil in both Pea and Full had greater soil organic carbon (SOC), soil total nitrogen (STN), and potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) than Fallow, but Pea, Full, and Fallow treatments did not differ in infiltration rate, penetration resistance, or soil enzyme activity. There were few differences in soil health parameters between Pea and Full, and among functional groups. Soil in the three-functional group treatments had 20%–35% greater PMN than in the one-functional group treatments (p < 0.05), yet SOC and STN were not affected by functional richness. Nitrogen rate did not affect SOC, STN, or PMN. Concentrations of SOC were weakly related (R2 = 0.05–0.14, p < 0.05) with 7-year aboveground biomass returned, suggesting practices that increase residue amounts might be more important to SOC and other soil health parameters than functional group or richness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信