冲刷与冲刷:屏障重塑的不同轨迹

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Joshua D. Himmelstein, Antonio B. Rodriguez
{"title":"冲刷与冲刷:屏障重塑的不同轨迹","authors":"Joshua D. Himmelstein,&nbsp;Antonio B. Rodriguez","doi":"10.1029/2024JF008047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Barrier islands are dynamic coastal landforms that can migrate landward from the press of sea-level rise and the pulse of storms. Previous work on barriers largely focuses on landward sediment mobilization, particularly through overwash, while the role of outwash—where sediment is transported seaward—remains underexamined. There exists a lack of direct comparisons between the processes that restore sediment volume and the timescales of recovery following outwash and overwash events. Here, we used high-resolution mapping and in situ and modeled water levels to quantify morphologic change and its relation to inundation at three contrasting sites. Our results demonstrate that outwash can remain a net erosive scar for years after formation, while overwash magnitude, frequency, and thus persistence vary largely depending on the width and elevational resistance of the barrier. When elevational resistance to overtopping is low, we show that intermediate high-water events can contribute as much sediment to island overwash as larger named storms and that these processes are key for outwash recovery. We find that modeled total water level correlates positively with volume change, while discrepancies between modeled and observed water levels implicate runup overwash as the dominant mode of transport. Together, we use these data to suggest a differentiation between overwash and outwash processes and their resulting morphologies in studies that aim to predict the impact of storms on barrier island transgression rates and broader ecological function.</p>","PeriodicalId":15887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","volume":"130 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Washout Versus Washover: Distinct Trajectories of Barrier Reshaping\",\"authors\":\"Joshua D. Himmelstein,&nbsp;Antonio B. Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JF008047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Barrier islands are dynamic coastal landforms that can migrate landward from the press of sea-level rise and the pulse of storms. Previous work on barriers largely focuses on landward sediment mobilization, particularly through overwash, while the role of outwash—where sediment is transported seaward—remains underexamined. There exists a lack of direct comparisons between the processes that restore sediment volume and the timescales of recovery following outwash and overwash events. Here, we used high-resolution mapping and in situ and modeled water levels to quantify morphologic change and its relation to inundation at three contrasting sites. Our results demonstrate that outwash can remain a net erosive scar for years after formation, while overwash magnitude, frequency, and thus persistence vary largely depending on the width and elevational resistance of the barrier. When elevational resistance to overtopping is low, we show that intermediate high-water events can contribute as much sediment to island overwash as larger named storms and that these processes are key for outwash recovery. We find that modeled total water level correlates positively with volume change, while discrepancies between modeled and observed water levels implicate runup overwash as the dominant mode of transport. Together, we use these data to suggest a differentiation between overwash and outwash processes and their resulting morphologies in studies that aim to predict the impact of storms on barrier island transgression rates and broader ecological function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface\",\"volume\":\"130 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JF008047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JF008047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

堰洲岛是动态的海岸地貌,可以在海平面上升的压力和风暴的脉动下向陆地迁移。先前关于屏障的工作主要集中在向陆地移动的沉积物上,特别是通过过度冲刷,而向外冲刷的作用——沉积物向海移动——仍然没有得到充分的研究。在恢复沉积物体积的过程与冲刷和冲过事件后恢复的时间尺度之间缺乏直接的比较。在这里,我们使用高分辨率制图和原位和模拟水位来量化三个对比地点的形态变化及其与淹没的关系。我们的研究结果表明,冲刷可以在形成后的数年内保持净侵蚀疤痕,而冲刷的幅度、频率和持久性在很大程度上取决于屏障的宽度和海拔阻力。当对过顶的海拔阻力较低时,我们表明,中等高水位事件对岛屿过冲的沉积物贡献与较大的命名风暴一样多,这些过程是冲刷恢复的关键。我们发现,模拟的总水位与体积变化呈正相关,而模拟水位与观测水位之间的差异暗示了上升冲过是主要的运输方式。总之,我们使用这些数据来建议在旨在预测风暴对堰洲岛海侵率和更广泛的生态功能的影响的研究中,过度冲刷和外溢过程及其产生的形态之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Washout Versus Washover: Distinct Trajectories of Barrier Reshaping

Barrier islands are dynamic coastal landforms that can migrate landward from the press of sea-level rise and the pulse of storms. Previous work on barriers largely focuses on landward sediment mobilization, particularly through overwash, while the role of outwash—where sediment is transported seaward—remains underexamined. There exists a lack of direct comparisons between the processes that restore sediment volume and the timescales of recovery following outwash and overwash events. Here, we used high-resolution mapping and in situ and modeled water levels to quantify morphologic change and its relation to inundation at three contrasting sites. Our results demonstrate that outwash can remain a net erosive scar for years after formation, while overwash magnitude, frequency, and thus persistence vary largely depending on the width and elevational resistance of the barrier. When elevational resistance to overtopping is low, we show that intermediate high-water events can contribute as much sediment to island overwash as larger named storms and that these processes are key for outwash recovery. We find that modeled total water level correlates positively with volume change, while discrepancies between modeled and observed water levels implicate runup overwash as the dominant mode of transport. Together, we use these data to suggest a differentiation between overwash and outwash processes and their resulting morphologies in studies that aim to predict the impact of storms on barrier island transgression rates and broader ecological function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
162
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信