{"title":"陀螺仪放射外科系统交付质量保证中的点剂量验证","authors":"Yagiz Yedekci , Huseyin Kıvanc , Fatih Biltekin , Demet Yildiz , Gozde Yazici , Gokhan Ozyigit","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of patient-specific delivery quality assurance (PS-DQA) using the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber within the ZAP-X gyroscopic radiosurgery system.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>PS-DQA measurements were performed on 110 patients with 184 lesions treated using the ZAP-X system. Target volumes ranged from 11 mm<sup>3</sup> to 63,044 mm<sup>3</sup>, with a mean of 4,321 mm<sup>3</sup>. Treatment plans were developed using the ZAP-X Treatment Planning System (TPS), which utilizes a ray-tracing algorithm for dose calculation. PS-DQA was conducted using a water-equivalent spherical phantom and the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber. The phantom was scanned with 0.625 mm CT slice thickness, and treatment plans were recalculated on the phantom’s CT dataset. The percentage differences between measured and planned doses were analyzed, focusing on different target volume categories and the use of small collimators (4 mm and 5 mm). Statistical analysis assessed the significance of observed differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most PS-DQA measurements (84%) showed discrepancies between -5% and +5% compared to planned doses. However, smaller target volumes (0-500 mm<sup>3</sup>) exhibited significantly higher percentage differences, highlighting challenges in dose measurement accuracy for these fields. Greater dose discrepancies were also observed when small collimators were extensively used, particularly when their usage exceeded 75% of total isocenters. Tukey HSD tests confirmed statistically significant differences between groups based on target volume and collimator size.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study confirms the feasibility of PS-DQA with the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber in the ZAP-X system while highlighting challenges with small target volumes and extensive use of small collimators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 112798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point Dose Verification in Delivery Quality Assurance for Gyroscopic Radiosurgery System\",\"authors\":\"Yagiz Yedekci , Huseyin Kıvanc , Fatih Biltekin , Demet Yildiz , Gozde Yazici , Gokhan Ozyigit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of patient-specific delivery quality assurance (PS-DQA) using the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber within the ZAP-X gyroscopic radiosurgery system.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>PS-DQA measurements were performed on 110 patients with 184 lesions treated using the ZAP-X system. Target volumes ranged from 11 mm<sup>3</sup> to 63,044 mm<sup>3</sup>, with a mean of 4,321 mm<sup>3</sup>. Treatment plans were developed using the ZAP-X Treatment Planning System (TPS), which utilizes a ray-tracing algorithm for dose calculation. PS-DQA was conducted using a water-equivalent spherical phantom and the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber. The phantom was scanned with 0.625 mm CT slice thickness, and treatment plans were recalculated on the phantom’s CT dataset. The percentage differences between measured and planned doses were analyzed, focusing on different target volume categories and the use of small collimators (4 mm and 5 mm). Statistical analysis assessed the significance of observed differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most PS-DQA measurements (84%) showed discrepancies between -5% and +5% compared to planned doses. However, smaller target volumes (0-500 mm<sup>3</sup>) exhibited significantly higher percentage differences, highlighting challenges in dose measurement accuracy for these fields. Greater dose discrepancies were also observed when small collimators were extensively used, particularly when their usage exceeded 75% of total isocenters. Tukey HSD tests confirmed statistically significant differences between groups based on target volume and collimator size.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study confirms the feasibility of PS-DQA with the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber in the ZAP-X system while highlighting challenges with small target volumes and extensive use of small collimators.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"234 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112798\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25002907\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25002907","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Point Dose Verification in Delivery Quality Assurance for Gyroscopic Radiosurgery System
Aim
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of patient-specific delivery quality assurance (PS-DQA) using the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber within the ZAP-X gyroscopic radiosurgery system.
Materials and Methods
PS-DQA measurements were performed on 110 patients with 184 lesions treated using the ZAP-X system. Target volumes ranged from 11 mm3 to 63,044 mm3, with a mean of 4,321 mm3. Treatment plans were developed using the ZAP-X Treatment Planning System (TPS), which utilizes a ray-tracing algorithm for dose calculation. PS-DQA was conducted using a water-equivalent spherical phantom and the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber. The phantom was scanned with 0.625 mm CT slice thickness, and treatment plans were recalculated on the phantom’s CT dataset. The percentage differences between measured and planned doses were analyzed, focusing on different target volume categories and the use of small collimators (4 mm and 5 mm). Statistical analysis assessed the significance of observed differences.
Results
Most PS-DQA measurements (84%) showed discrepancies between -5% and +5% compared to planned doses. However, smaller target volumes (0-500 mm3) exhibited significantly higher percentage differences, highlighting challenges in dose measurement accuracy for these fields. Greater dose discrepancies were also observed when small collimators were extensively used, particularly when their usage exceeded 75% of total isocenters. Tukey HSD tests confirmed statistically significant differences between groups based on target volume and collimator size.
Conclusion
The study confirms the feasibility of PS-DQA with the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber in the ZAP-X system while highlighting challenges with small target volumes and extensive use of small collimators.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.