暗含手部动作的图片对皮质脊髓抑制的反应:一项后续的经颅磁刺激研究

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Riccardo Dalla Volta , Francesco Scarfone , Dario Brambilla , Roberto Esposti , Paolo Cavallari
{"title":"暗含手部动作的图片对皮质脊髓抑制的反应:一项后续的经颅磁刺激研究","authors":"Riccardo Dalla Volta ,&nbsp;Francesco Scarfone ,&nbsp;Dario Brambilla ,&nbsp;Roberto Esposti ,&nbsp;Paolo Cavallari","doi":"10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Presentation of bodily actions is known to affect motor system activity in perceivers’ brain. A previous study (Gianelli, Kuehne, Lo Presti, Mencaraglia &amp; Dalla Volta, 2020) employing hand-tool interaction with apparent motion showed early suppression of corticospinal excitability in hand muscles. To control for the role of apparent motion and to investigate the suppression duration, in the present follow up study participants observed pics displaying hand-tool actions, with no apparent motion but only implied motion. Single pulse TMS was delivered on the hand sector of the left motor cortex at 1 s after fixation cross (baseline), at 150, 350, 500 and 700 ms from stimulus onset, while motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the contralateral first dorsal interosseus muscle. Results showed a difference in MEP amplitude between hand action-related and control pics where hand action observation suppressed corticospinal excitability, suggesting early and enduring motor inhibition. In addition, MEP amplitude decreased over time. These findings rule out a necessary role of apparent motion, indicating that the simple presentation of hand actions with implied motion effectively induced motor inhibition. Corticospinal suppression may act to prevent the motor system from automatically transforming observed actions into overt movements whenever an action is observed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55331,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Cognition","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corticospinal suppression in response to pics with implied hand actions: A follow up TMS study\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo Dalla Volta ,&nbsp;Francesco Scarfone ,&nbsp;Dario Brambilla ,&nbsp;Roberto Esposti ,&nbsp;Paolo Cavallari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bandc.2025.106298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Presentation of bodily actions is known to affect motor system activity in perceivers’ brain. A previous study (Gianelli, Kuehne, Lo Presti, Mencaraglia &amp; Dalla Volta, 2020) employing hand-tool interaction with apparent motion showed early suppression of corticospinal excitability in hand muscles. To control for the role of apparent motion and to investigate the suppression duration, in the present follow up study participants observed pics displaying hand-tool actions, with no apparent motion but only implied motion. Single pulse TMS was delivered on the hand sector of the left motor cortex at 1 s after fixation cross (baseline), at 150, 350, 500 and 700 ms from stimulus onset, while motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the contralateral first dorsal interosseus muscle. Results showed a difference in MEP amplitude between hand action-related and control pics where hand action observation suppressed corticospinal excitability, suggesting early and enduring motor inhibition. In addition, MEP amplitude decreased over time. These findings rule out a necessary role of apparent motion, indicating that the simple presentation of hand actions with implied motion effectively induced motor inhibition. Corticospinal suppression may act to prevent the motor system from automatically transforming observed actions into overt movements whenever an action is observed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262625000387\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262625000387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已知身体动作的呈现会影响感知者大脑中的运动系统活动。先前的一项研究(Gianelli, Kuehne, Lo Presti, Mencaraglia等);Dalla Volta, 2020)利用手-工具与表观运动的相互作用显示手部肌肉皮质脊髓兴奋性的早期抑制。为了控制表观运动的作用和研究抑制持续时间,在本研究中,参与者观察了显示手工具动作的图片,没有表观运动,只有隐含运动。分别在固定交叉后1 s(基线)、刺激开始后150、350、500和700 ms对左运动皮层手部部位进行单脉冲TMS,同时记录对侧第一背骨间肌的运动诱发电位(MEPs)。结果显示,手动作相关图和对照图的MEP振幅存在差异,其中手动作观察抑制了皮质脊髓兴奋性,提示早期和持久的运动抑制。此外,MEP振幅随时间减小。这些发现排除了明显运动的必要作用,表明简单的手部动作的暗示运动有效地诱导了运动抑制。皮质脊髓抑制可以防止运动系统在观察到动作时自动将观察到的动作转化为明显的动作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corticospinal suppression in response to pics with implied hand actions: A follow up TMS study
Presentation of bodily actions is known to affect motor system activity in perceivers’ brain. A previous study (Gianelli, Kuehne, Lo Presti, Mencaraglia & Dalla Volta, 2020) employing hand-tool interaction with apparent motion showed early suppression of corticospinal excitability in hand muscles. To control for the role of apparent motion and to investigate the suppression duration, in the present follow up study participants observed pics displaying hand-tool actions, with no apparent motion but only implied motion. Single pulse TMS was delivered on the hand sector of the left motor cortex at 1 s after fixation cross (baseline), at 150, 350, 500 and 700 ms from stimulus onset, while motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the contralateral first dorsal interosseus muscle. Results showed a difference in MEP amplitude between hand action-related and control pics where hand action observation suppressed corticospinal excitability, suggesting early and enduring motor inhibition. In addition, MEP amplitude decreased over time. These findings rule out a necessary role of apparent motion, indicating that the simple presentation of hand actions with implied motion effectively induced motor inhibition. Corticospinal suppression may act to prevent the motor system from automatically transforming observed actions into overt movements whenever an action is observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Cognition
Brain and Cognition 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Brain and Cognition is a forum for the integration of the neurosciences and cognitive sciences. B&C publishes peer-reviewed research articles, theoretical papers, case histories that address important theoretical issues, and historical articles into the interaction between cognitive function and brain processes. The focus is on rigorous studies of an empirical or theoretical nature and which make an original contribution to our knowledge about the involvement of the nervous system in cognition. Coverage includes, but is not limited to memory, learning, emotion, perception, movement, music or praxis in relationship to brain structure or function. Published articles will typically address issues relating some aspect of cognitive function to its neurological substrates with clear theoretical import, formulating new hypotheses or refuting previously established hypotheses. Clinical papers are welcome if they raise issues of theoretical importance or concern and shed light on the interaction between brain function and cognitive function. We welcome review articles that clearly contribute a new perspective or integration, beyond summarizing the literature in the field; authors of review articles should make explicit where the contribution lies. We also welcome proposals for special issues on aspects of the relation between cognition and the structure and function of the nervous system. Such proposals can be made directly to the Editor-in-Chief from individuals interested in being guest editors for such collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信