IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Christine Leyns , Elliot McClenaghan , Patricia Rodriguez , Patrick Nguipdop-Djomo , Carla Ascarrunz , Daniel Eid Rodriguez , Punam Mangtani , Javier Guitian
{"title":"Hybrid, vaccine-induced and natural immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in traditional food markets in Bolivia (2020−2022): A cross-sectional analysis of a serological survey","authors":"Christine Leyns ,&nbsp;Elliot McClenaghan ,&nbsp;Patricia Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Patrick Nguipdop-Djomo ,&nbsp;Carla Ascarrunz ,&nbsp;Daniel Eid Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Punam Mangtani ,&nbsp;Javier Guitian","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In low-and middle-income countries, market vendors played a crucial role in food security during the coronavirus pandemic. High numbers of contacts, combined with social, political and health system upheaval in Bolivia, meant they were highly exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infections.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Demographic, clinical and serological data were collected at survey rounds between 2020 and 2022 from a cohort of market vendors in two purposively selected markets where the community and researchers co-promoted health and safety. We used these longitudinal data to examine SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody levels between those vaccinated with and without previous infection and those unvaccinated. The association between antibody levels, and vaccine status, socio-demographic and health information was assessed using linear regression.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>A total of 213 market vendors had repeated serological sampling in July, and November 2021, and again in May 2022. In November 2020, 105 (49.3 %) of this cohort had participated in a pre-vaccination municipal serological survey. Seroprevalence then was 45·7 % (95 %CI 36·3–55·4). By November 2021, 67·8 % of the full cohort had one vaccination and seroprevalence was 83·6 %. We showed IgG levels in those seropositive were higher in participants with evidence of vaccination and prior infection compared to those unvaccinated. By May 2022, the majority of participants developed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, and these differences were attenuated.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>A substantial proportion of vendors were susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 in late 2020 when, nationally, excess mortality was high. Our analyses suggested a combination of natural infection and vaccination provided better protective antibody levels than natural infection alone at the peak of the pandemic. Future pandemic planning requires timely targeted serological surveys to understand pandemic dynamics and support prompt interventions. In addition, communication with organized communities can inform effectiveness of pandemic mitigation strategies including improved vaccination uptake. Timely quantitative IgG level monitoring can also inform waning immunity.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This study was supported by the Medical Research Council and a National Institutes for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Effort on COVID-19 (GECO) Health Research award 2020 [MR/V028561/1].</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 127104"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25004013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在冠状病毒大流行期间,中低收入国家的市场商贩在食品安全方面发挥着至关重要的作用。方法在 2020 年至 2022 年期间,我们在两个特意选择的市场中收集了一批市场商贩的人口统计学、临床和血清学数据,这两个市场是社区和研究人员共同促进健康和安全的地方。我们利用这些纵向数据研究了接种过疫苗和未感染过疫苗的人群与未接种过疫苗的人群之间的 SARS-CoV-2 抗尖峰抗体水平。我们使用线性回归法评估了抗体水平与疫苗接种情况、社会人口学和健康信息之间的关联。结果 2021 年 7 月、11 月和 2022 年 5 月,共对 213 个市场摊贩进行了重复血清采样。2020 年 11 月,其中 105 人(49.3%)参加了疫苗接种前的市政血清学调查。当时的血清流行率为 45-7%(95 %CI 36-3-55-4)。到 2021 年 11 月,67-8% 的人群接种过一次疫苗,血清流行率为 83-6%。我们发现,与未接种疫苗者相比,在有接种疫苗和既往感染证据的参与者中,血清阳性者的 IgG 水平更高。到 2022 年 5 月,大多数参与者都产生了 SARS-CoV-2 抗体,而这些差异已经减弱。解释:2020 年末,相当一部分供应商对 SARS-CoV-2 易感,而当时全国的超额死亡率很高。我们的分析表明,在疫情高峰期,自然感染和接种疫苗相结合所产生的保护性抗体水平要优于单纯的自然感染。未来的大流行规划需要及时开展有针对性的血清学调查,以了解大流行动态并支持及时干预。此外,与有组织的社区进行沟通可以了解疫情缓解策略的有效性,包括提高疫苗接种率。本研究得到了医学研究委员会和美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)2020 年 COVID-19 全球努力(GECO)健康研究奖 [MR/V028561/1] 的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid, vaccine-induced and natural immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in traditional food markets in Bolivia (2020−2022): A cross-sectional analysis of a serological survey

Background

In low-and middle-income countries, market vendors played a crucial role in food security during the coronavirus pandemic. High numbers of contacts, combined with social, political and health system upheaval in Bolivia, meant they were highly exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infections.

Methods

Demographic, clinical and serological data were collected at survey rounds between 2020 and 2022 from a cohort of market vendors in two purposively selected markets where the community and researchers co-promoted health and safety. We used these longitudinal data to examine SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody levels between those vaccinated with and without previous infection and those unvaccinated. The association between antibody levels, and vaccine status, socio-demographic and health information was assessed using linear regression.

Findings

A total of 213 market vendors had repeated serological sampling in July, and November 2021, and again in May 2022. In November 2020, 105 (49.3 %) of this cohort had participated in a pre-vaccination municipal serological survey. Seroprevalence then was 45·7 % (95 %CI 36·3–55·4). By November 2021, 67·8 % of the full cohort had one vaccination and seroprevalence was 83·6 %. We showed IgG levels in those seropositive were higher in participants with evidence of vaccination and prior infection compared to those unvaccinated. By May 2022, the majority of participants developed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, and these differences were attenuated.

Interpretation

A substantial proportion of vendors were susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 in late 2020 when, nationally, excess mortality was high. Our analyses suggested a combination of natural infection and vaccination provided better protective antibody levels than natural infection alone at the peak of the pandemic. Future pandemic planning requires timely targeted serological surveys to understand pandemic dynamics and support prompt interventions. In addition, communication with organized communities can inform effectiveness of pandemic mitigation strategies including improved vaccination uptake. Timely quantitative IgG level monitoring can also inform waning immunity.

Funding

This study was supported by the Medical Research Council and a National Institutes for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Effort on COVID-19 (GECO) Health Research award 2020 [MR/V028561/1].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信