在英国的一个系统中,不同的可降解纸尿裤的环境性能

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Gema Amaya Santos , Andrea Paulillo , Charnett Chau , Danielle Purkiss , Mark Miodownik , Paola Lettieri
{"title":"在英国的一个系统中,不同的可降解纸尿裤的环境性能","authors":"Gema Amaya Santos ,&nbsp;Andrea Paulillo ,&nbsp;Charnett Chau ,&nbsp;Danielle Purkiss ,&nbsp;Mark Miodownik ,&nbsp;Paola Lettieri","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impact of compostable diapers in the UK across four disposal scenarios: (1) landfill and incineration (L&amp;I); (2) composting with food and garden waste, with landfilling of the resulting compost (C-FGW); (3) separate composting and landfilling of the compost (C-NCC); and (4) separate composting with compost application as a soil amendment (C-CC). The environmental impacts were assessed with EF 3.0 method. The results indicate that diaper manufacture is the primary environmental impact contributor across all scenarios. C-CC emerges as the most environmentally favourable scenario, offsetting L&amp;I with a reduction in mineral resource use (28 %), water use (19 %), and freshwater ecotoxicity (15 %). However, the contribution to climate change, eutrophication, acidification and human toxicity only shows marginal improvements. Hybrid scenarios combining composting and landfilling (C-FGW and C-NCC) yield the least favourable outcomes due to loss of composting benefits and potential emissions from landfill. Potential biogenic carbon sequestration for diaper disposal was estimated, with L&amp;I generating higher emissions than C-CC, and compost landfilling resulting in potential carbon storage. This study highlights the need to consider infrastructure challenges and soil health risks before widespread adoption of diaper composting in UK. Overall, this research provides insights into the environmental performance of compostable diapers, identifies key limitations and informs policy decisions regarding sustainable diaper disposal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"508 ","pages":"Article 145504"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The environmental performance of different end-of-life options for compostable diapers in a UK system\",\"authors\":\"Gema Amaya Santos ,&nbsp;Andrea Paulillo ,&nbsp;Charnett Chau ,&nbsp;Danielle Purkiss ,&nbsp;Mark Miodownik ,&nbsp;Paola Lettieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impact of compostable diapers in the UK across four disposal scenarios: (1) landfill and incineration (L&amp;I); (2) composting with food and garden waste, with landfilling of the resulting compost (C-FGW); (3) separate composting and landfilling of the compost (C-NCC); and (4) separate composting with compost application as a soil amendment (C-CC). The environmental impacts were assessed with EF 3.0 method. The results indicate that diaper manufacture is the primary environmental impact contributor across all scenarios. C-CC emerges as the most environmentally favourable scenario, offsetting L&amp;I with a reduction in mineral resource use (28 %), water use (19 %), and freshwater ecotoxicity (15 %). However, the contribution to climate change, eutrophication, acidification and human toxicity only shows marginal improvements. Hybrid scenarios combining composting and landfilling (C-FGW and C-NCC) yield the least favourable outcomes due to loss of composting benefits and potential emissions from landfill. Potential biogenic carbon sequestration for diaper disposal was estimated, with L&amp;I generating higher emissions than C-CC, and compost landfilling resulting in potential carbon storage. This study highlights the need to consider infrastructure challenges and soil health risks before widespread adoption of diaper composting in UK. Overall, this research provides insights into the environmental performance of compostable diapers, identifies key limitations and informs policy decisions regarding sustainable diaper disposal.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"508 \",\"pages\":\"Article 145504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625008546\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625008546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用生命周期评估(LCA)来评估英国可堆肥纸尿裤在四种处置方案下的环境影响:(1)填埋和焚烧(L&;I);(2)用食物和园林垃圾进行堆肥,并将堆肥填埋(C-FGW);(3)堆肥分开堆肥和填埋(C-NCC);(4)将堆肥与堆肥应用作为土壤改良剂(C-CC)分开。环境影响评价采用EF 3.0法。结果表明,纸尿裤生产是所有情景中主要的环境影响因素。C-CC是最有利于环境的方案,通过减少矿物资源使用(28%)、水使用(19%)和淡水生态毒性(15%)来抵消l - 1。然而,对气候变化、富营养化、酸化和人类毒性的贡献只显示出微小的改善。混合方案结合堆肥和垃圾填埋(C-FGW和C-NCC)产生最不利的结果,因为失去了堆肥效益和潜在的垃圾填埋排放。对纸尿裤处理的潜在生物碳固存进行了估计,其中L&;I产生的排放量高于C-CC,堆肥填埋产生潜在的碳储存。这项研究强调,在英国广泛采用纸尿裤堆肥之前,需要考虑基础设施的挑战和土壤健康风险。总的来说,这项研究提供了对可堆肥尿布的环境性能的见解,确定了关键的限制,并为有关可持续尿布处理的政策决策提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The environmental performance of different end-of-life options for compostable diapers in a UK system
This study employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impact of compostable diapers in the UK across four disposal scenarios: (1) landfill and incineration (L&I); (2) composting with food and garden waste, with landfilling of the resulting compost (C-FGW); (3) separate composting and landfilling of the compost (C-NCC); and (4) separate composting with compost application as a soil amendment (C-CC). The environmental impacts were assessed with EF 3.0 method. The results indicate that diaper manufacture is the primary environmental impact contributor across all scenarios. C-CC emerges as the most environmentally favourable scenario, offsetting L&I with a reduction in mineral resource use (28 %), water use (19 %), and freshwater ecotoxicity (15 %). However, the contribution to climate change, eutrophication, acidification and human toxicity only shows marginal improvements. Hybrid scenarios combining composting and landfilling (C-FGW and C-NCC) yield the least favourable outcomes due to loss of composting benefits and potential emissions from landfill. Potential biogenic carbon sequestration for diaper disposal was estimated, with L&I generating higher emissions than C-CC, and compost landfilling resulting in potential carbon storage. This study highlights the need to consider infrastructure challenges and soil health risks before widespread adoption of diaper composting in UK. Overall, this research provides insights into the environmental performance of compostable diapers, identifies key limitations and informs policy decisions regarding sustainable diaper disposal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信