在分析化学中正确选择绿色度和相关度量工具的指南-教程

IF 5.7 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Lutfi Andre Yahya , Christina Vakh , Olha Dushna , Oktawia Kalisz , Szymon Bocian , Marek Tobiszewski
{"title":"在分析化学中正确选择绿色度和相关度量工具的指南-教程","authors":"Lutfi Andre Yahya ,&nbsp;Christina Vakh ,&nbsp;Olha Dushna ,&nbsp;Oktawia Kalisz ,&nbsp;Szymon Bocian ,&nbsp;Marek Tobiszewski","doi":"10.1016/j.aca.2025.344052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The metric tools that aim to assess greenness, whiteness or related aspects of analytical procedures are gaining in popularity. At the same time, their application is not standardized, leading to unintentional abuses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Within this study, two datasets were created, consisting of the greenness assessment results for 27 (for general assessment) and 3 (for reproducibility study) analytical procedures, obtained with available greenness and related metric tools. The first dataset was assessed with multivariate statistical tools, and the analysis shows that metric tools give correlated results. The second dataset was used to calculate the reproducibility of metric tools results.</div></div><div><h3>Significance and novelty</h3><div>Based on the results of multivariate statistics and reproducibility analyses, we propose guidelines for the application of metric tools. Obeying these guidelines will result in a more standardized approach to assessment, consistency of results, and drawing more meaningful conclusions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":240,"journal":{"name":"Analytica Chimica Acta","volume":"1357 ","pages":"Article 344052"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines on the proper selection of greenness and related metric tools in analytical chemistry – a tutorial\",\"authors\":\"Lutfi Andre Yahya ,&nbsp;Christina Vakh ,&nbsp;Olha Dushna ,&nbsp;Oktawia Kalisz ,&nbsp;Szymon Bocian ,&nbsp;Marek Tobiszewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aca.2025.344052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The metric tools that aim to assess greenness, whiteness or related aspects of analytical procedures are gaining in popularity. At the same time, their application is not standardized, leading to unintentional abuses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Within this study, two datasets were created, consisting of the greenness assessment results for 27 (for general assessment) and 3 (for reproducibility study) analytical procedures, obtained with available greenness and related metric tools. The first dataset was assessed with multivariate statistical tools, and the analysis shows that metric tools give correlated results. The second dataset was used to calculate the reproducibility of metric tools results.</div></div><div><h3>Significance and novelty</h3><div>Based on the results of multivariate statistics and reproducibility analyses, we propose guidelines for the application of metric tools. Obeying these guidelines will result in a more standardized approach to assessment, consistency of results, and drawing more meaningful conclusions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytica Chimica Acta\",\"volume\":\"1357 \",\"pages\":\"Article 344052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytica Chimica Acta\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267025004465\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267025004465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旨在评估分析程序的绿度、白度或相关方面的度量工具正越来越受欢迎。同时,它们的应用不规范,导致无意的滥用。在本研究中,创建了两个数据集,包括27个(用于一般评估)和3个(用于可重复性研究)分析程序的绿色评估结果,这些结果是通过可用的绿色度和相关度量工具获得的。第一个数据集使用多元统计工具进行评估,分析表明度量工具给出了相关结果。第二个数据集用于计算计量工具结果的可重复性。根据多元统计和可重复性分析的结果,我们提出了度量工具应用的指导方针。遵守这些指导方针将导致更标准化的评估方法,结果的一致性,并得出更有意义的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Guidelines on the proper selection of greenness and related metric tools in analytical chemistry – a tutorial

Guidelines on the proper selection of greenness and related metric tools in analytical chemistry – a tutorial

Guidelines on the proper selection of greenness and related metric tools in analytical chemistry – a tutorial

Background

The metric tools that aim to assess greenness, whiteness or related aspects of analytical procedures are gaining in popularity. At the same time, their application is not standardized, leading to unintentional abuses.

Results

Within this study, two datasets were created, consisting of the greenness assessment results for 27 (for general assessment) and 3 (for reproducibility study) analytical procedures, obtained with available greenness and related metric tools. The first dataset was assessed with multivariate statistical tools, and the analysis shows that metric tools give correlated results. The second dataset was used to calculate the reproducibility of metric tools results.

Significance and novelty

Based on the results of multivariate statistics and reproducibility analyses, we propose guidelines for the application of metric tools. Obeying these guidelines will result in a more standardized approach to assessment, consistency of results, and drawing more meaningful conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analytica Chimica Acta
Analytica Chimica Acta 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
1081
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Analytica Chimica Acta has an open access mirror journal Analytica Chimica Acta: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Analytica Chimica Acta provides a forum for the rapid publication of original research, and critical, comprehensive reviews dealing with all aspects of fundamental and applied modern analytical chemistry. The journal welcomes the submission of research papers which report studies concerning the development of new and significant analytical methodologies. In determining the suitability of submitted articles for publication, particular scrutiny will be placed on the degree of novelty and impact of the research and the extent to which it adds to the existing body of knowledge in analytical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信