用行为经济学理解失控进食的强化机制:一种生态瞬时评估方法。

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Emily K Burr,Lidia Z Meshesha,Robert D Dvorak,Quinn Allen,Tatiana Magri,Callie L Wang,Emma R Hayden,Nadia E Rodriguez,Angelina V Leary,Madison Maynard,Stephen A Wonderlich,Glen Forester,Lauren M Schaefer
{"title":"用行为经济学理解失控进食的强化机制:一种生态瞬时评估方法。","authors":"Emily K Burr,Lidia Z Meshesha,Robert D Dvorak,Quinn Allen,Tatiana Magri,Callie L Wang,Emma R Hayden,Nadia E Rodriguez,Angelina V Leary,Madison Maynard,Stephen A Wonderlich,Glen Forester,Lauren M Schaefer","doi":"10.1037/abn0000996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Loss-of-control eating (LOCE) is the subjective inability to stop eating once one has started or to refrain from food consumption. State-level affect, food craving, and reward dysfunction have all been implicated as vulnerabilities to recurrent LOCE, mostly studied in the context of binge eating (i.e., LOCE with objective overeating). Hypothetical purchase tasks are a behavioral economic approach to assessing the reward value of a given behavior or commodity, which have typically been used in substance use literature. The current study tested a momentary mediation model in which positive and negative affect at Time 1 was hypothesized to predict Time 2 food demand (assessed using three variables from an ambulatory food purchase task), in turn leading to LOCE at Time 3 by way of Time 2 craving (affect → food demand → craving → LOCE). This model was assessed using a 10-day ecological momentary assessment protocol in 78 community adults with recurrent LOCE (87% female, 71% White). At the within-subjects (i.e., momentary) level, LOCE was predicted by prior food craving. Food reward value metrics additionally mediated the LOCE antecedent of negative affect, but not positive affect. Interestingly, between subjects, the relationship between craving and LOCE was unexpectedly negative, and only negative affect was associated with subsequent LOCE, by way of time two craving but not time two food reward value. Clinical implications and future directions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using behavioral economics to understand reinforcement mechanisms of loss-of-control eating: An ecological momentary assessment approach.\",\"authors\":\"Emily K Burr,Lidia Z Meshesha,Robert D Dvorak,Quinn Allen,Tatiana Magri,Callie L Wang,Emma R Hayden,Nadia E Rodriguez,Angelina V Leary,Madison Maynard,Stephen A Wonderlich,Glen Forester,Lauren M Schaefer\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/abn0000996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Loss-of-control eating (LOCE) is the subjective inability to stop eating once one has started or to refrain from food consumption. State-level affect, food craving, and reward dysfunction have all been implicated as vulnerabilities to recurrent LOCE, mostly studied in the context of binge eating (i.e., LOCE with objective overeating). Hypothetical purchase tasks are a behavioral economic approach to assessing the reward value of a given behavior or commodity, which have typically been used in substance use literature. The current study tested a momentary mediation model in which positive and negative affect at Time 1 was hypothesized to predict Time 2 food demand (assessed using three variables from an ambulatory food purchase task), in turn leading to LOCE at Time 3 by way of Time 2 craving (affect → food demand → craving → LOCE). This model was assessed using a 10-day ecological momentary assessment protocol in 78 community adults with recurrent LOCE (87% female, 71% White). At the within-subjects (i.e., momentary) level, LOCE was predicted by prior food craving. Food reward value metrics additionally mediated the LOCE antecedent of negative affect, but not positive affect. Interestingly, between subjects, the relationship between craving and LOCE was unexpectedly negative, and only negative affect was associated with subsequent LOCE, by way of time two craving but not time two food reward value. Clinical implications and future directions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":73914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进食失控(LOCE)是一种主观上无法停止进食的症状,一旦开始进食或抑制进食。状态层面的情感、食物渴望和奖励功能障碍都与LOCE复发的脆弱性有关,这些研究大多是在暴饮暴食(即LOCE伴客观暴饮暴食)的背景下进行的。假设购买任务是一种评估特定行为或商品的奖励价值的行为经济学方法,通常用于物质使用文献。目前的研究测试了一个瞬间中介模型,其中假设时间1的积极和消极情绪可以预测时间2的食物需求(使用来自流动食物购买任务的三个变量进行评估),进而通过时间2的渴望(情感→食物需求→渴望→LOCE)导致时间3的LOCE。对78例复发性LOCE的社区成年人(87%为女性,71%为白人)进行了为期10天的生态瞬时评估。在被试内部(即瞬时)水平,LOCE是由先前的食物渴望来预测的。食物奖励价值衡量标准对负性情绪的LOCE前因有调节作用,但对正性情绪无调节作用。有趣的是,在受试者之间,渴望与LOCE之间的关系出乎意料地呈负相关,只有消极情绪与随后的LOCE相关,通过时间两次渴望而不是时间两次食物奖励值。讨论了临床意义和未来发展方向。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using behavioral economics to understand reinforcement mechanisms of loss-of-control eating: An ecological momentary assessment approach.
Loss-of-control eating (LOCE) is the subjective inability to stop eating once one has started or to refrain from food consumption. State-level affect, food craving, and reward dysfunction have all been implicated as vulnerabilities to recurrent LOCE, mostly studied in the context of binge eating (i.e., LOCE with objective overeating). Hypothetical purchase tasks are a behavioral economic approach to assessing the reward value of a given behavior or commodity, which have typically been used in substance use literature. The current study tested a momentary mediation model in which positive and negative affect at Time 1 was hypothesized to predict Time 2 food demand (assessed using three variables from an ambulatory food purchase task), in turn leading to LOCE at Time 3 by way of Time 2 craving (affect → food demand → craving → LOCE). This model was assessed using a 10-day ecological momentary assessment protocol in 78 community adults with recurrent LOCE (87% female, 71% White). At the within-subjects (i.e., momentary) level, LOCE was predicted by prior food craving. Food reward value metrics additionally mediated the LOCE antecedent of negative affect, but not positive affect. Interestingly, between subjects, the relationship between craving and LOCE was unexpectedly negative, and only negative affect was associated with subsequent LOCE, by way of time two craving but not time two food reward value. Clinical implications and future directions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信