镰状细胞病急性胸综合征抗凝治疗与预防剂量的比较:TASC随机临床试验

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Armand Mekontso Dessap,Anoosha Habibi,Jean-Benoît Arlet,Muriel Fartoukh,Laurent Guerin,Constance Guillaud,Damien Roux,Johanna Oziel,Stéphanie Ngo,Benjamin Carpentier,Marilucy Lopez-Sublet,Louis Affo,Giovanna Melica,Maryse Etienne-Julan,Isabelle Delacroix,François Lionnet,Gylna Loko,Daniel Da Silva,Marc Michel,Keyvan Razazi,Anaïs Charles-Nelson,Pablo Bartolucci,Ségolène Gendreau,Sandrine Katsahian,Bernard Maitre
{"title":"镰状细胞病急性胸综合征抗凝治疗与预防剂量的比较:TASC随机临床试验","authors":"Armand Mekontso Dessap,Anoosha Habibi,Jean-Benoît Arlet,Muriel Fartoukh,Laurent Guerin,Constance Guillaud,Damien Roux,Johanna Oziel,Stéphanie Ngo,Benjamin Carpentier,Marilucy Lopez-Sublet,Louis Affo,Giovanna Melica,Maryse Etienne-Julan,Isabelle Delacroix,François Lionnet,Gylna Loko,Daniel Da Silva,Marc Michel,Keyvan Razazi,Anaïs Charles-Nelson,Pablo Bartolucci,Ségolène Gendreau,Sandrine Katsahian,Bernard Maitre","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202409-1727oc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nPatients with sickle cell disease hospitalised for acute chest syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of in situ pulmonary microthrombosis. We evaluated whether therapeutic anticoagulation could shorten ACS duration.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nTASC is a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial conducted in 12 French hospitals (December 2016-April 2021) in adult ACS patients with no initial thrombosis on chest computerised tomography with pulmonary angiogram. We randomised 172 patients (1:1) to receive either prophylactic or therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight tinzaparin for 7 days. The primary efficacy outcome was time to ACS resolution. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Main secondary outcomes included parenteral opioids consumption, transfusion, mortality at hospital discharge, and hospital readmissions at 6 months.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nThe primary efficacy outcome, time to ACS resolution, analysed using a Cox model, was shorter with therapeutic anticoagulation than with prophylactic doses (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI: [0.51-0.99]; p=0.044). As a supplemental estimate, the restricted mean time to ACS resolution (over a 15-day horizon or discharge) was shorter with therapeutic doses (4.8±0.4 vs 6.1±0.5 days). The primary safety outcome (major bleeding) did not occur in either group. The cumulative dose of parenteral opioids was lower with therapeutic anticoagulation: (124 [80;272] vs 219 [65;378] mg morphine equivalent, difference: -96, 95%CI: -202 to -46, p=0.02). Other short- and long-term secondary outcomes were similar between groups.\r\n\r\nINTERPRETATION\r\nIn adult patients with ACS, a therapeutic anticoagulation shortened ACS duration and reduced opioids consumption compared with prophylactic doses, without increasing bleeding risk. Clinical trial registration available at www.\r\n\r\nCLINICALTRIALS\r\ngov, ID: NCT02580773.","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Doses of Anticoagulation for Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease: The TASC Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Armand Mekontso Dessap,Anoosha Habibi,Jean-Benoît Arlet,Muriel Fartoukh,Laurent Guerin,Constance Guillaud,Damien Roux,Johanna Oziel,Stéphanie Ngo,Benjamin Carpentier,Marilucy Lopez-Sublet,Louis Affo,Giovanna Melica,Maryse Etienne-Julan,Isabelle Delacroix,François Lionnet,Gylna Loko,Daniel Da Silva,Marc Michel,Keyvan Razazi,Anaïs Charles-Nelson,Pablo Bartolucci,Ségolène Gendreau,Sandrine Katsahian,Bernard Maitre\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/rccm.202409-1727oc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nPatients with sickle cell disease hospitalised for acute chest syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of in situ pulmonary microthrombosis. We evaluated whether therapeutic anticoagulation could shorten ACS duration.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nTASC is a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial conducted in 12 French hospitals (December 2016-April 2021) in adult ACS patients with no initial thrombosis on chest computerised tomography with pulmonary angiogram. We randomised 172 patients (1:1) to receive either prophylactic or therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight tinzaparin for 7 days. The primary efficacy outcome was time to ACS resolution. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Main secondary outcomes included parenteral opioids consumption, transfusion, mortality at hospital discharge, and hospital readmissions at 6 months.\\r\\n\\r\\nFINDINGS\\r\\nThe primary efficacy outcome, time to ACS resolution, analysed using a Cox model, was shorter with therapeutic anticoagulation than with prophylactic doses (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI: [0.51-0.99]; p=0.044). As a supplemental estimate, the restricted mean time to ACS resolution (over a 15-day horizon or discharge) was shorter with therapeutic doses (4.8±0.4 vs 6.1±0.5 days). The primary safety outcome (major bleeding) did not occur in either group. The cumulative dose of parenteral opioids was lower with therapeutic anticoagulation: (124 [80;272] vs 219 [65;378] mg morphine equivalent, difference: -96, 95%CI: -202 to -46, p=0.02). Other short- and long-term secondary outcomes were similar between groups.\\r\\n\\r\\nINTERPRETATION\\r\\nIn adult patients with ACS, a therapeutic anticoagulation shortened ACS duration and reduced opioids consumption compared with prophylactic doses, without increasing bleeding risk. Clinical trial registration available at www.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICALTRIALS\\r\\ngov, ID: NCT02580773.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202409-1727oc\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202409-1727oc","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景因急性胸部综合征(ACS)住院的镰状细胞病患者是原位肺微血栓形成的高危人群。我们评估了治疗性抗凝是否能缩短 ACS 的持续时间。方法 STASC 是一项随机、对照、双盲试验,在法国 12 家医院进行(2016 年 12 月至 2021 年 4 月),对象是胸部计算机断层扫描和肺血管造影显示无初始血栓形成的成人 ACS 患者。我们随机抽取了 172 名患者(1:1),让他们接受预防或治疗剂量的低分子量锡扎肝素治疗,为期 7 天。主要疗效指标是 ACS 缓解时间。主要安全性结果为大出血。主要次要结局包括肠外阿片类药物用量、输血、出院时死亡率和6个月时的再入院率。研究结果:使用Cox模型分析的主要疗效结局--ACS缓解时间--治疗性抗凝时间短于预防性抗凝时间(危险比为0.71;95% CI:[0.51-0.99];P=0.044)。作为补充估计,使用治疗剂量时,ACS缓解的限制性平均时间(15天或出院)更短(4.8±0.4天 vs 6.1±0.5天)。两组均未出现主要安全性结果(大出血)。治疗性抗凝剂的肠外阿片类药物累积剂量较低:(124 [80;272] vs 219 [65;378] 毫克吗啡当量,差异:-96,95%CI:0.5%):-96,95%CI:-202 至 -46,P=0.02)。其他短期和长期次要结果在各组之间相似。在 ACS 成年患者中,治疗性抗凝剂与预防性剂量相比,可缩短 ACS 持续时间并减少阿片类药物的用量,但不会增加出血风险。临床试验注册请访问 www.CLINICALTRIALSgov,ID:NCT02580773。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Prophylactic and Therapeutic Doses of Anticoagulation for Acute Chest Syndrome in Sickle Cell Disease: The TASC Randomized Clinical Trial.
BACKGROUND Patients with sickle cell disease hospitalised for acute chest syndrome (ACS) are at high risk of in situ pulmonary microthrombosis. We evaluated whether therapeutic anticoagulation could shorten ACS duration. METHODS TASC is a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial conducted in 12 French hospitals (December 2016-April 2021) in adult ACS patients with no initial thrombosis on chest computerised tomography with pulmonary angiogram. We randomised 172 patients (1:1) to receive either prophylactic or therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight tinzaparin for 7 days. The primary efficacy outcome was time to ACS resolution. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Main secondary outcomes included parenteral opioids consumption, transfusion, mortality at hospital discharge, and hospital readmissions at 6 months. FINDINGS The primary efficacy outcome, time to ACS resolution, analysed using a Cox model, was shorter with therapeutic anticoagulation than with prophylactic doses (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% CI: [0.51-0.99]; p=0.044). As a supplemental estimate, the restricted mean time to ACS resolution (over a 15-day horizon or discharge) was shorter with therapeutic doses (4.8±0.4 vs 6.1±0.5 days). The primary safety outcome (major bleeding) did not occur in either group. The cumulative dose of parenteral opioids was lower with therapeutic anticoagulation: (124 [80;272] vs 219 [65;378] mg morphine equivalent, difference: -96, 95%CI: -202 to -46, p=0.02). Other short- and long-term secondary outcomes were similar between groups. INTERPRETATION In adult patients with ACS, a therapeutic anticoagulation shortened ACS duration and reduced opioids consumption compared with prophylactic doses, without increasing bleeding risk. Clinical trial registration available at www. CLINICALTRIALS gov, ID: NCT02580773.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信