Jana K McHugh,Elizabeth K Bancroft,Edward Saunders,Mark N Brook,Eva McGrowder,Sarah Wakerell,Denzil James,Reshma Rageevakumar,Barbara Benton,Natalie Taylor,Kathryn Myhill,Matthew Hogben,Netty Kinsella,Aslam A Sohaib,Declan Cahill,Stephen Hazell,Samuel J Withey,Naami Mcaddy,Elizabeth C Page,Andrea Osborne,Sarah Benafif,Ann-Britt Jones,Dhruv Patel,Dean Y Huang,Kaljit Kaur,Bradley Russell,Ray Nicholson,Fionnuala Croft,Justyna Sobczak,Claire McNally,Fiona Mutch,Samantha Bennett,Lenita Kingston,Questa Karlsson,Tokhir Dadaev,Sibel Saya,Susan Merson,Angela Wood,Nening Dennis,Nafisa Hussain,Alison Thwaites,Syed Hussain,Imran Rafi,Michelle Ferris,Pardeep Kumar,Nicholas D James,Nora Pashayan,Zsofia Kote-Jarai,Rosalind A Eeles,
{"title":"多基因风险评分在前列腺癌筛查中的评估。","authors":"Jana K McHugh,Elizabeth K Bancroft,Edward Saunders,Mark N Brook,Eva McGrowder,Sarah Wakerell,Denzil James,Reshma Rageevakumar,Barbara Benton,Natalie Taylor,Kathryn Myhill,Matthew Hogben,Netty Kinsella,Aslam A Sohaib,Declan Cahill,Stephen Hazell,Samuel J Withey,Naami Mcaddy,Elizabeth C Page,Andrea Osborne,Sarah Benafif,Ann-Britt Jones,Dhruv Patel,Dean Y Huang,Kaljit Kaur,Bradley Russell,Ray Nicholson,Fionnuala Croft,Justyna Sobczak,Claire McNally,Fiona Mutch,Samantha Bennett,Lenita Kingston,Questa Karlsson,Tokhir Dadaev,Sibel Saya,Susan Merson,Angela Wood,Nening Dennis,Nafisa Hussain,Alison Thwaites,Syed Hussain,Imran Rafi,Michelle Ferris,Pardeep Kumar,Nicholas D James,Nora Pashayan,Zsofia Kote-Jarai,Rosalind A Eeles,","doi":"10.1056/nejmoa2407934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThe incidence of prostate cancer is increasing. Screening with an assay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has a high rate for false positive results. Genomewide association studies have identified common germline variants in persons with prostate cancer, which can be used to calculate a polygenic risk score associated with risk of prostate cancer.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe recruited persons 55 to 69 years of age from primary care centers in the United Kingdom. Using germline DNA extracted from saliva, we derived polygenic risk scores from 130 variants known to be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. Participants with a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher were invited to undergo prostate cancer screening with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transperineal biopsy, irrespective of PSA level.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong 40,292 persons invited to participate, 8953 (22.2%) expressed interest in participating and 6393 had their polygenic risk score calculated; 745 (11.7%) had a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher and were invited to undergo screening. Of these 745 participants, 468 (62.8%) underwent MRI and prostate biopsy; prostate cancer was detected in 187 participants (40.0%). The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range, 57 to 73). Of the 187 participants with cancer, 103 (55.1%) had prostate cancer classified as intermediate or higher risk according to the 2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria, so treatment was indicated; cancer would not have been detected in 74 (71.8%) of these participants according to the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway currently used in the United Kingdom (high PSA level and positive MRI results). In addition, 40 of the participants with cancer (21.4%) had disease classified as unfavorable intermediate risk or as high or very high risk according to NCCN criteria.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn a prostate cancer screening program involving participants in the top decile of risk as determined by a polygenic risk score, the percentage found to have clinically significant disease was higher than the percentage that would have been identified with the use of PSA or MRI. (Funded by the European Research Council Seventh Framework Program and others; BARCODE1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03857477.).","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"218 1","pages":"1406-1417"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of a Polygenic Risk Score in Screening for Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jana K McHugh,Elizabeth K Bancroft,Edward Saunders,Mark N Brook,Eva McGrowder,Sarah Wakerell,Denzil James,Reshma Rageevakumar,Barbara Benton,Natalie Taylor,Kathryn Myhill,Matthew Hogben,Netty Kinsella,Aslam A Sohaib,Declan Cahill,Stephen Hazell,Samuel J Withey,Naami Mcaddy,Elizabeth C Page,Andrea Osborne,Sarah Benafif,Ann-Britt Jones,Dhruv Patel,Dean Y Huang,Kaljit Kaur,Bradley Russell,Ray Nicholson,Fionnuala Croft,Justyna Sobczak,Claire McNally,Fiona Mutch,Samantha Bennett,Lenita Kingston,Questa Karlsson,Tokhir Dadaev,Sibel Saya,Susan Merson,Angela Wood,Nening Dennis,Nafisa Hussain,Alison Thwaites,Syed Hussain,Imran Rafi,Michelle Ferris,Pardeep Kumar,Nicholas D James,Nora Pashayan,Zsofia Kote-Jarai,Rosalind A Eeles,\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/nejmoa2407934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nThe incidence of prostate cancer is increasing. Screening with an assay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has a high rate for false positive results. Genomewide association studies have identified common germline variants in persons with prostate cancer, which can be used to calculate a polygenic risk score associated with risk of prostate cancer.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe recruited persons 55 to 69 years of age from primary care centers in the United Kingdom. Using germline DNA extracted from saliva, we derived polygenic risk scores from 130 variants known to be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. Participants with a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher were invited to undergo prostate cancer screening with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transperineal biopsy, irrespective of PSA level.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAmong 40,292 persons invited to participate, 8953 (22.2%) expressed interest in participating and 6393 had their polygenic risk score calculated; 745 (11.7%) had a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher and were invited to undergo screening. Of these 745 participants, 468 (62.8%) underwent MRI and prostate biopsy; prostate cancer was detected in 187 participants (40.0%). The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range, 57 to 73). Of the 187 participants with cancer, 103 (55.1%) had prostate cancer classified as intermediate or higher risk according to the 2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria, so treatment was indicated; cancer would not have been detected in 74 (71.8%) of these participants according to the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway currently used in the United Kingdom (high PSA level and positive MRI results). In addition, 40 of the participants with cancer (21.4%) had disease classified as unfavorable intermediate risk or as high or very high risk according to NCCN criteria.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nIn a prostate cancer screening program involving participants in the top decile of risk as determined by a polygenic risk score, the percentage found to have clinically significant disease was higher than the percentage that would have been identified with the use of PSA or MRI. (Funded by the European Research Council Seventh Framework Program and others; BARCODE1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03857477.).\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"218 1\",\"pages\":\"1406-1417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":96.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2407934\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2407934","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of a Polygenic Risk Score in Screening for Prostate Cancer.
BACKGROUND
The incidence of prostate cancer is increasing. Screening with an assay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has a high rate for false positive results. Genomewide association studies have identified common germline variants in persons with prostate cancer, which can be used to calculate a polygenic risk score associated with risk of prostate cancer.
METHODS
We recruited persons 55 to 69 years of age from primary care centers in the United Kingdom. Using germline DNA extracted from saliva, we derived polygenic risk scores from 130 variants known to be associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer. Participants with a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher were invited to undergo prostate cancer screening with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transperineal biopsy, irrespective of PSA level.
RESULTS
Among 40,292 persons invited to participate, 8953 (22.2%) expressed interest in participating and 6393 had their polygenic risk score calculated; 745 (11.7%) had a polygenic risk score in the 90th percentile or higher and were invited to undergo screening. Of these 745 participants, 468 (62.8%) underwent MRI and prostate biopsy; prostate cancer was detected in 187 participants (40.0%). The median age at diagnosis was 64 years (range, 57 to 73). Of the 187 participants with cancer, 103 (55.1%) had prostate cancer classified as intermediate or higher risk according to the 2024 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria, so treatment was indicated; cancer would not have been detected in 74 (71.8%) of these participants according to the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway currently used in the United Kingdom (high PSA level and positive MRI results). In addition, 40 of the participants with cancer (21.4%) had disease classified as unfavorable intermediate risk or as high or very high risk according to NCCN criteria.
CONCLUSIONS
In a prostate cancer screening program involving participants in the top decile of risk as determined by a polygenic risk score, the percentage found to have clinically significant disease was higher than the percentage that would have been identified with the use of PSA or MRI. (Funded by the European Research Council Seventh Framework Program and others; BARCODE1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03857477.).
期刊介绍:
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.