Russell J Boag,Luke Strickland,Andrew Heathcote,Shayne Loft
{"title":"The dynamics of stability and flexibility: How attentional and cognitive control support multitasking under time pressure.","authors":"Russell J Boag,Luke Strickland,Andrew Heathcote,Shayne Loft","doi":"10.1037/xge0001749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Managing the trade-off between stability (robustness to interference) and flexibility (readiness to adapt to change) places considerable demands on human attention, cognitive control, and meta-control processes. However, little is known about the cognitive mechanisms driving stability-flexibility adaptation in multitasking contexts, and such mechanisms have implications for effective task completion in everyday life and in complex work settings, particularly when individuals enter performance \"red zones\" where task demands exceed capacity to manage them. We present a computational model that explains how individuals, in a cognitively demanding prospective memory (PM) paradigm, cognitively adapt to the relative prevalence of competing task responses to achieve more stable or more flexible performance under conditions in and out of the \"red zone\" (high vs. low time pressure). The model explained observed ongoing- and PM-task performance in terms of the quality and quantity of attentional capacity directed to each task and context-sensitive differences in proactive and reactive cognitive control. The results are consistent with a view of stability and flexibility as potentially independent dimensions of control, the management of which is subject to human processing/capacity constraints. The model furthers understanding of human cognitive flexibility, with potential implications for humans working in dynamic, information-rich settings requiring behavioral flexibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
管理稳定性(对干扰的稳健性)和灵活性(适应变化的准备程度)之间的权衡对人类的注意力、认知控制和元控制过程提出了相当高的要求。然而,人们对多任务情境中驱动稳定性-灵活性适应的认知机制知之甚少,而这种机制对日常生活和复杂工作环境中有效完成任务具有重要影响,尤其是当个体进入任务要求超出管理能力的绩效 "红区 "时。我们提出了一个计算模型,该模型解释了在认知要求较高的前瞻性记忆(PM)范式中,个体如何在 "红区 "内外(高时间压力与低时间压力)的条件下,认知适应竞争性任务反应的相对普遍性,以获得更稳定或更灵活的表现。该模型从针对每项任务的注意能力的质和量以及主动和被动认知控制的情境敏感性差异的角度解释了观察到的进行中任务和下午任务的表现。研究结果与将稳定性和灵活性视为潜在的独立控制维度的观点是一致的,这两个维度的管理受到人类处理/能力的限制。该模型加深了人们对人类认知灵活性的理解,对在动态、信息丰富、需要行为灵活性的环境中工作的人类具有潜在影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved)。
The dynamics of stability and flexibility: How attentional and cognitive control support multitasking under time pressure.
Managing the trade-off between stability (robustness to interference) and flexibility (readiness to adapt to change) places considerable demands on human attention, cognitive control, and meta-control processes. However, little is known about the cognitive mechanisms driving stability-flexibility adaptation in multitasking contexts, and such mechanisms have implications for effective task completion in everyday life and in complex work settings, particularly when individuals enter performance "red zones" where task demands exceed capacity to manage them. We present a computational model that explains how individuals, in a cognitively demanding prospective memory (PM) paradigm, cognitively adapt to the relative prevalence of competing task responses to achieve more stable or more flexible performance under conditions in and out of the "red zone" (high vs. low time pressure). The model explained observed ongoing- and PM-task performance in terms of the quality and quantity of attentional capacity directed to each task and context-sensitive differences in proactive and reactive cognitive control. The results are consistent with a view of stability and flexibility as potentially independent dimensions of control, the management of which is subject to human processing/capacity constraints. The model furthers understanding of human cognitive flexibility, with potential implications for humans working in dynamic, information-rich settings requiring behavioral flexibility. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.