求助PDF
{"title":"基于分步法与连续注入法的非饱和岩石CH4突破压力数值模拟对比研究","authors":"Jiaqi Zhao, Yi Li, Qi Li, Wentao Ban, Qingchun Yu","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Gas breakthrough pressure is a key parameter affecting gas production and evaluation of tight reservoir sealing capabilities. This study aims to explore the impact of different injection methods on CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure in unsaturated rocks. COMSOL Multiphysics was used to simulate the CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough process, and comparative analysis was conducted using step-by-step and continuous injection methods. The results show that the step-by-step method has higher measurement accuracy under low CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure and is suitable for scenarios that require precise evaluation, whereas the continuous injection method is more efficient under high CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure and is suitable for rapid evaluation needs. According to outcomes of simulation, this research suggested a numerical optimization framework aimed at forecasting the breakthrough pressure of CH<sub>4</sub> and verified the accuracy and applicability of the model through linear fitting of experimental data and predicted values. In addition, the study also conducted a sensitivity analysis on the pore distribution index (<i>m</i>) and injection flow rate (<i>u<sub>in</sub></i>) in the van Genuchten model. The results show that <i>u<sub>in</sub></i> has a small impact on breakthrough pressure, whereas <i>m</i> has a considerable effect on breakthrough pressure. An increase in <i>m</i> leads to an increase in breakthrough pressure, thereby enhancing the sealing performance of rock core. This study reveals the applicability difference between the step-by-step method and the continuous injection method in predicting CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure and proposes an effective prediction method based on numerical simulation, which provides valuable insights for selecting gas injection methods and predicting breakthrough pressure in rocks. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"15 2","pages":"229-247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Numerical Simulation of CH4 Breakthrough Pressure in Unsaturated Rock Based on Step-By-Step Method and Continuous Injection Method\",\"authors\":\"Jiaqi Zhao, Yi Li, Qi Li, Wentao Ban, Qingchun Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ghg.2335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Gas breakthrough pressure is a key parameter affecting gas production and evaluation of tight reservoir sealing capabilities. This study aims to explore the impact of different injection methods on CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure in unsaturated rocks. COMSOL Multiphysics was used to simulate the CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough process, and comparative analysis was conducted using step-by-step and continuous injection methods. The results show that the step-by-step method has higher measurement accuracy under low CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure and is suitable for scenarios that require precise evaluation, whereas the continuous injection method is more efficient under high CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure and is suitable for rapid evaluation needs. According to outcomes of simulation, this research suggested a numerical optimization framework aimed at forecasting the breakthrough pressure of CH<sub>4</sub> and verified the accuracy and applicability of the model through linear fitting of experimental data and predicted values. In addition, the study also conducted a sensitivity analysis on the pore distribution index (<i>m</i>) and injection flow rate (<i>u<sub>in</sub></i>) in the van Genuchten model. The results show that <i>u<sub>in</sub></i> has a small impact on breakthrough pressure, whereas <i>m</i> has a considerable effect on breakthrough pressure. An increase in <i>m</i> leads to an increase in breakthrough pressure, thereby enhancing the sealing performance of rock core. This study reveals the applicability difference between the step-by-step method and the continuous injection method in predicting CH<sub>4</sub> breakthrough pressure and proposes an effective prediction method based on numerical simulation, which provides valuable insights for selecting gas injection methods and predicting breakthrough pressure in rocks. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"229-247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2335\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2335","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用