神经源性口咽部吞咽困难患者临床吞咽检查中的口颌练习结果

J.C. Suárez-Escudero , V. De Alba-Higuita , J. Bareño-Silva
{"title":"神经源性口咽部吞咽困难患者临床吞咽检查中的口颌练习结果","authors":"J.C. Suárez-Escudero ,&nbsp;V. De Alba-Higuita ,&nbsp;J. Bareño-Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.neurop.2025.100191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Praxis facilitate the execution of learned motor acts, including swallowing. Inability to perform praxis movements, or apraxia, may be classified according to different criteria. Buccopharyngeal apraxia includes orofacial apraxia. Clinical swallow evaluation does not typically include assessment of oropharyngeal/orofacial praxes; however, this would be of great semiological value, particularly in patients with neurological and neuromuscular disorders who present with dysphagia. The objective of this study was to explore and compare findings from the assessment of 3 orofacial praxis in healthy individuals without dysphagia and in patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia, as part of the clinical swallow examination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We designed a case–control study based on a clinical swallow examination that included an assessment of 3 orofacial praxis. Comparisons were made, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Non-performance of the 3 orofacial praxis was recorded separately and jointly, adjusting for sex and age in both groups, as well as for other clinical variables of interest in the patient group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study included 86 patients and 80 controls. Oral motor apraxia was associated with oropharyngeal dysphagia; more specifically, the presence of neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia was found to be associated with difficulty in moving both lips together to either side, as well as with such other physical examination findings as tongue fasciculations and atrophy, and impaired tongue coordination. No statistically significant association was observed with age or sex in either group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Assessment of orofacial praxes can help to identify patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74283,"journal":{"name":"Neurology perspectives","volume":"5 3","pages":"Article 100191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Findings in orofacial praxis in clinical swallow examination in patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia\",\"authors\":\"J.C. Suárez-Escudero ,&nbsp;V. De Alba-Higuita ,&nbsp;J. Bareño-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neurop.2025.100191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Praxis facilitate the execution of learned motor acts, including swallowing. Inability to perform praxis movements, or apraxia, may be classified according to different criteria. Buccopharyngeal apraxia includes orofacial apraxia. Clinical swallow evaluation does not typically include assessment of oropharyngeal/orofacial praxes; however, this would be of great semiological value, particularly in patients with neurological and neuromuscular disorders who present with dysphagia. The objective of this study was to explore and compare findings from the assessment of 3 orofacial praxis in healthy individuals without dysphagia and in patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia, as part of the clinical swallow examination.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We designed a case–control study based on a clinical swallow examination that included an assessment of 3 orofacial praxis. Comparisons were made, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Non-performance of the 3 orofacial praxis was recorded separately and jointly, adjusting for sex and age in both groups, as well as for other clinical variables of interest in the patient group.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study included 86 patients and 80 controls. Oral motor apraxia was associated with oropharyngeal dysphagia; more specifically, the presence of neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia was found to be associated with difficulty in moving both lips together to either side, as well as with such other physical examination findings as tongue fasciculations and atrophy, and impaired tongue coordination. No statistically significant association was observed with age or sex in either group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Assessment of orofacial praxes can help to identify patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology perspectives\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667049625000092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667049625000092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

练习有助于执行习得的运动动作,包括吞咽。不能进行练习运动或失用症可根据不同的标准进行分类。咽失用症包括口面部失用症。临床吞咽评估通常不包括口咽/口面检查;然而,这将具有很大的符号学价值,特别是在患有神经和神经肌肉疾病并伴有吞咽困难的患者中。本研究的目的是探讨并比较无吞咽困难的健康个体和神经源性口咽吞咽困难患者的3口面部实践评估结果,作为临床吞咽检查的一部分。方法我们设计了一项基于临床吞咽检查的病例对照研究,包括对3个口腔面部实践的评估。进行比较,并计算95%置信区间的比值比。分别记录和联合记录3种口面术的不表现,并根据两组患者的性别和年龄以及患者组中其他感兴趣的临床变量进行调整。结果本研究纳入86例患者和80例对照组。口腔运动失用症与口咽吞咽困难相关;更具体地说,神经源性口咽吞咽困难的存在被发现与两唇一起向任何一侧移动困难有关,也与诸如舌束状收缩和萎缩以及舌协调受损等其他体格检查结果有关。在两组中均未观察到与年龄或性别有统计学意义的关联。结论评价口面部功能有助于识别神经源性口咽吞咽困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Findings in orofacial praxis in clinical swallow examination in patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia

Introduction

Praxis facilitate the execution of learned motor acts, including swallowing. Inability to perform praxis movements, or apraxia, may be classified according to different criteria. Buccopharyngeal apraxia includes orofacial apraxia. Clinical swallow evaluation does not typically include assessment of oropharyngeal/orofacial praxes; however, this would be of great semiological value, particularly in patients with neurological and neuromuscular disorders who present with dysphagia. The objective of this study was to explore and compare findings from the assessment of 3 orofacial praxis in healthy individuals without dysphagia and in patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia, as part of the clinical swallow examination.

Methods

We designed a case–control study based on a clinical swallow examination that included an assessment of 3 orofacial praxis. Comparisons were made, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Non-performance of the 3 orofacial praxis was recorded separately and jointly, adjusting for sex and age in both groups, as well as for other clinical variables of interest in the patient group.

Results

Our study included 86 patients and 80 controls. Oral motor apraxia was associated with oropharyngeal dysphagia; more specifically, the presence of neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia was found to be associated with difficulty in moving both lips together to either side, as well as with such other physical examination findings as tongue fasciculations and atrophy, and impaired tongue coordination. No statistically significant association was observed with age or sex in either group.

Conclusion

Assessment of orofacial praxes can help to identify patients with neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信