评估-治疗间隔和转移性活检部位对黑色素瘤中PD-L1表达在1 %截止水平上的预测值的影响

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cecilie D. Vestergaard , Marco Donia , Kasper Madsen , Henrik Schmidt , Adam A. Luczak , Lars Bastholt , Eva Ellebaek , Inge M. Svane
{"title":"评估-治疗间隔和转移性活检部位对黑色素瘤中PD-L1表达在1 %截止水平上的预测值的影响","authors":"Cecilie D. Vestergaard ,&nbsp;Marco Donia ,&nbsp;Kasper Madsen ,&nbsp;Henrik Schmidt ,&nbsp;Adam A. Luczak ,&nbsp;Lars Bastholt ,&nbsp;Eva Ellebaek ,&nbsp;Inge M. Svane","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intratumoral PD-L1 expression at the 1 % cut-off predicts clinical outcomes and may guide first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) selection for metastatic melanoma (MM). However, the impact of the interval between PD-L1 assessment and ICI initiation and the metastatic site used for PD-L1 evaluation, remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this nationwide cohort study we used the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED) and the Danish Pathology Registry to analyze patients with MM treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 from January 2017 to February 2024. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Log-rank tests and Cox regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data from 1137 patients were analyzed. Among patients with PD-L1 assessed within 90 days of treatment (n = 964; 55.2 % PD-L1 &lt;1 %, 44.8 % PD-L1 ≥1 %), combination therapy improved outcomes in PD-L1 &lt; 1 % (PFS adjusted (a)HR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.48–0.80; p &lt; 0.001, OS aHR 0.64; 95 % CI 0.48–0.85; p = 0.002), while outcomes were comparable for PD-L1 ≥ 1 % patients (PFS aHR 0.90; 95 % CI 0.62–1.30; p = 0.57, OS aHR 0.97; 95 % CI 0.60–1.57; p = 0.89). For PD-L1 assessed &gt; 90 days prior (n = 173), this pattern was less pronounced. Among 48 paired PD-L1 assessments from the same organ, discordance occurred in 25 %. Combination therapy improved PFS for patients with PD-L1 &lt; 1 % skin/subcutaneous (aHR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.34–0.76; p &lt; 0.001) and visceral metastases (aHR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.42–1.02; p = 0.060) while this association was not evident for lymph node metastases (aHR 0.79; 95 % CI 0.48–1.29; p = 0.35).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PD-L1 seems a reliable predictive biomarker in MM, when assessed on tissue obtained within 90 days prior to ICI initiation. Non-nodal metastatic sites appear preferable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 115402"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of assessment-to-treatment interval and metastatic biopsy site on the predictive value of PD-L1 expression at the 1 % cut-off level in melanoma\",\"authors\":\"Cecilie D. Vestergaard ,&nbsp;Marco Donia ,&nbsp;Kasper Madsen ,&nbsp;Henrik Schmidt ,&nbsp;Adam A. Luczak ,&nbsp;Lars Bastholt ,&nbsp;Eva Ellebaek ,&nbsp;Inge M. Svane\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intratumoral PD-L1 expression at the 1 % cut-off predicts clinical outcomes and may guide first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) selection for metastatic melanoma (MM). However, the impact of the interval between PD-L1 assessment and ICI initiation and the metastatic site used for PD-L1 evaluation, remains unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this nationwide cohort study we used the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED) and the Danish Pathology Registry to analyze patients with MM treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 from January 2017 to February 2024. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Log-rank tests and Cox regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data from 1137 patients were analyzed. Among patients with PD-L1 assessed within 90 days of treatment (n = 964; 55.2 % PD-L1 &lt;1 %, 44.8 % PD-L1 ≥1 %), combination therapy improved outcomes in PD-L1 &lt; 1 % (PFS adjusted (a)HR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.48–0.80; p &lt; 0.001, OS aHR 0.64; 95 % CI 0.48–0.85; p = 0.002), while outcomes were comparable for PD-L1 ≥ 1 % patients (PFS aHR 0.90; 95 % CI 0.62–1.30; p = 0.57, OS aHR 0.97; 95 % CI 0.60–1.57; p = 0.89). For PD-L1 assessed &gt; 90 days prior (n = 173), this pattern was less pronounced. Among 48 paired PD-L1 assessments from the same organ, discordance occurred in 25 %. Combination therapy improved PFS for patients with PD-L1 &lt; 1 % skin/subcutaneous (aHR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.34–0.76; p &lt; 0.001) and visceral metastases (aHR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.42–1.02; p = 0.060) while this association was not evident for lymph node metastases (aHR 0.79; 95 % CI 0.48–1.29; p = 0.35).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PD-L1 seems a reliable predictive biomarker in MM, when assessed on tissue obtained within 90 days prior to ICI initiation. Non-nodal metastatic sites appear preferable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925001832\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925001832","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤PD-L1表达在1 %的临界值可以预测临床结果,并可能指导转移性黑色素瘤(MM)的一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的选择。然而,PD-L1评估和ICI启动之间的间隔时间以及用于PD-L1评估的转移部位的影响尚不清楚。方法在这项全国性队列研究中,我们使用丹麦转移性黑色素瘤数据库(DAMMED)和丹麦病理登记处,分析2017年1月至2024年2月期间接受抗pd -1或抗pd -1加抗ctla -4治疗的MM患者。采用Log-rank检验和Cox回归分析无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果分析了1137例患者的数据。在治疗90天内评估的PD-L1患者中(n = 964;55.2 % PD-L1 & lt; 1 % 44.8 % PD-L1 ≥1 %),联合治疗结果的改善PD-L1 & lt; 1 % (PFS调整(a)人力资源0.62;95 % ci 0.48-0.80;p <; 0.001,OS aHR 0.64;95 % ci 0.48-0.85;p = 0.002),而PD-L1 ≥ 1 %患者的结果具有可比性(PFS aHR 0.90;95 % ci 0.62-1.30;p = 0.57,OS aHR 0.97;95 % ci 0.60-1.57; = 0.89页)。对于在 90天前评估的PD-L1 (n = 173),这种模式不太明显。在来自同一器官的48对PD-L1评估中,出现不一致的比例为25% %。联合治疗改善PD-L1患者PFS <; 1 %皮肤/皮下(aHR 0.51;95 % ci 0.34-0.76;p <; 0.001)和内脏转移(aHR 0.65;95 % ci 0.42-1.02;p = 0.060),而这种关联在淋巴结转移中不明显(aHR 0.79;95 % ci 0.48-1.29; = 0.35页)。结论:当在ICI开始前90天内获得的组织中进行评估时,spd - l1似乎是MM的可靠预测生物标志物。非结节性转移部位更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of assessment-to-treatment interval and metastatic biopsy site on the predictive value of PD-L1 expression at the 1 % cut-off level in melanoma

Background

Intratumoral PD-L1 expression at the 1 % cut-off predicts clinical outcomes and may guide first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) selection for metastatic melanoma (MM). However, the impact of the interval between PD-L1 assessment and ICI initiation and the metastatic site used for PD-L1 evaluation, remains unclear.

Methods

In this nationwide cohort study we used the Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED) and the Danish Pathology Registry to analyze patients with MM treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 from January 2017 to February 2024. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Log-rank tests and Cox regression.

Results

Data from 1137 patients were analyzed. Among patients with PD-L1 assessed within 90 days of treatment (n = 964; 55.2 % PD-L1 <1 %, 44.8 % PD-L1 ≥1 %), combination therapy improved outcomes in PD-L1 < 1 % (PFS adjusted (a)HR 0.62; 95 % CI 0.48–0.80; p < 0.001, OS aHR 0.64; 95 % CI 0.48–0.85; p = 0.002), while outcomes were comparable for PD-L1 ≥ 1 % patients (PFS aHR 0.90; 95 % CI 0.62–1.30; p = 0.57, OS aHR 0.97; 95 % CI 0.60–1.57; p = 0.89). For PD-L1 assessed > 90 days prior (n = 173), this pattern was less pronounced. Among 48 paired PD-L1 assessments from the same organ, discordance occurred in 25 %. Combination therapy improved PFS for patients with PD-L1 < 1 % skin/subcutaneous (aHR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.34–0.76; p < 0.001) and visceral metastases (aHR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.42–1.02; p = 0.060) while this association was not evident for lymph node metastases (aHR 0.79; 95 % CI 0.48–1.29; p = 0.35).

Conclusions

PD-L1 seems a reliable predictive biomarker in MM, when assessed on tissue obtained within 90 days prior to ICI initiation. Non-nodal metastatic sites appear preferable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer
European Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
953
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信