IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Jayne Morriss
{"title":"Psychological mechanisms underpinning change in intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety-related disorders: New insights for translational research","authors":"Jayne Morriss","doi":"10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intolerance of uncertainty (IU), the tendency to find uncertainty negative, is a fundamental transdiagnostic dimension across anxiety-related disorders. Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in both clinical and experimental research on the role of IU in the maintenance and treatment of anxiety-related disorders. However, there has been a lack of integration of research findings from a mechanistic perspective, which has slowed progress in translational research. This review seeks to fill this gap by synthesising the clinical (e.g. randomised controlled trials) and experimental (e.g. lab-based) literature on the psychological mechanisms that drive change in IU across anxiety-related disorders. The review highlighted that: (1) cognitive restructuring, supported by mechanisms such as cognitive appraisal, modify IU-related cognitions, (2) behavioural exposures, supported by mechanisms such as inhibitory learning, alter IU-related cognitions and physiological arousal, and (3) mindfulness techniques underpinned by mechanisms such as attentional monitoring, decentering, and acceptance, change IU-related cognitions. Across the different therapeutic techniques reviewed, there was a lack of evidence for how different mechanisms change IU-related emotions and behaviours. Directions for further research include directly comparing the effectiveness of different mechanisms that produce change in IU across anxiety disorders and other mental health disorders, and examining the specificity of change in IU over other anxious traits. Overall, the findings provide a foundation for future translational research efforts to build upon maximising existing treatment interventions and/or to develop novel treatment interventions to target dispositional IU and situational uncertainty-related distress in anxiety-related disorders and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56105,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 106138"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149763425001381","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对不确定性的不容忍(IU),即认为不确定性是负面的倾向,是焦虑相关障碍的一个基本跨诊断维度。过去二十年来,关于不确定性不容忍在焦虑相关障碍的维持和治疗中的作用的临床和实验研究不断增加。然而,由于缺乏从机理角度对研究结果进行整合,导致转化研究进展缓慢。本综述试图通过综合临床(如随机对照试验)和实验(如基于实验室的)文献来填补这一空白,这些文献涉及了推动焦虑相关障碍中IU变化的心理机制。综述强调(1) 在认知评估等机制的支持下,认知重组改变了与 IU 相关的认知;(2) 在抑制性学习等机制的支持下,行为暴露改变了与 IU 相关的认知和生理唤醒;(3) 在注意力监测、去中心化和接受等机制的支持下,正念技术改变了与 IU 相关的认知。在所审查的不同治疗技术中,缺乏关于不同机制如何改变与 IU 相关的情绪和行为的证据。进一步研究的方向包括:直接比较不同机制对焦虑症和其他心理健康疾病产生 IU 变化的有效性,以及研究 IU 变化相对于其他焦虑特征的特异性。总之,这些研究结果为未来的转化研究工作奠定了基础,以便在最大限度地利用现有治疗干预措施的基础上,和/或开发新型治疗干预措施,针对焦虑相关疾病及其他疾病中的倾向性IU和情境不确定性相关困扰进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological mechanisms underpinning change in intolerance of uncertainty across anxiety-related disorders: New insights for translational research
Intolerance of uncertainty (IU), the tendency to find uncertainty negative, is a fundamental transdiagnostic dimension across anxiety-related disorders. Over the past two decades, there has been an increase in both clinical and experimental research on the role of IU in the maintenance and treatment of anxiety-related disorders. However, there has been a lack of integration of research findings from a mechanistic perspective, which has slowed progress in translational research. This review seeks to fill this gap by synthesising the clinical (e.g. randomised controlled trials) and experimental (e.g. lab-based) literature on the psychological mechanisms that drive change in IU across anxiety-related disorders. The review highlighted that: (1) cognitive restructuring, supported by mechanisms such as cognitive appraisal, modify IU-related cognitions, (2) behavioural exposures, supported by mechanisms such as inhibitory learning, alter IU-related cognitions and physiological arousal, and (3) mindfulness techniques underpinned by mechanisms such as attentional monitoring, decentering, and acceptance, change IU-related cognitions. Across the different therapeutic techniques reviewed, there was a lack of evidence for how different mechanisms change IU-related emotions and behaviours. Directions for further research include directly comparing the effectiveness of different mechanisms that produce change in IU across anxiety disorders and other mental health disorders, and examining the specificity of change in IU over other anxious traits. Overall, the findings provide a foundation for future translational research efforts to build upon maximising existing treatment interventions and/or to develop novel treatment interventions to target dispositional IU and situational uncertainty-related distress in anxiety-related disorders and beyond.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
466
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the International Behavioral Neuroscience Society publishes original and significant review articles that explore the intersection between neuroscience and the study of psychological processes and behavior. The journal also welcomes articles that primarily focus on psychological processes and behavior, as long as they have relevance to one or more areas of neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信