Rohan Benjankar , Daniele Tonina , Andrew W. Tranmer , Sabin Paudel , Aruna Shrestha
{"title":"半封闭调节河系中洪泛平原宽度对水力变异性和水生河岸生境的重要性","authors":"Rohan Benjankar , Daniele Tonina , Andrew W. Tranmer , Sabin Paudel , Aruna Shrestha","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydraulic variability (e.g., reach-scale heterogeneity of depth, velocity, and shear stress) can generate diverse riverine habitat conditions that support species biodiversity and ecological resilience. To evaluate hydraulic variability over a range of discharges from seasonal low flow to overbank flood, we used a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model to simulate depth (<em>D</em>), velocity (<em>V</em>), shear stress (τ), and the hydromorphological index of diversity (<em>HMID</em>), a dimensionless index used to characterize hydraulic heterogeneity. Simulated hydraulics were also used to evaluate aquatic (bull trout rearing) and riparian (cottonwood and willow seedling recruitment) habitat quality. We compared each of these metrics against the dimensionless relative floodplain width (<em>W*</em>) of individual (1 km long) reaches over 22 km of a semi-confined gravel-bed river system.</div><div>Hydraulic variability, aquatic habitat, and riparian forest recruitment depended on discharge and <em>W*</em>. Hydraulic variability generally decreased with increasing discharge but increased with greater <em>W*</em>. Confined reaches (<em>W*</em> < 2.5) maintained low hydraulic variability regardless of discharge, whereas less confined reaches (<em>W*</em> > 2.5) exhibited greater variability during higher flows. Aquatic habitat quality also generally decreased as discharge increased because velocities became too fast in the channel for bull trout rearing habitat. The influence of <em>W*</em> was most important for aquatic habitat during higher discharges when greater off-channel habitat in the floodplain became hydraulically connected and increased habitat quality and area. Hydraulic variability during sub-bankfull discharges was not important for aquatic habitat, but became critical during overbank flow when hydraulic refuge was necessary during flood conditions. In contrast, overbank floods provided critical riparian recruitment processes that increased with greater <em>W*</em>. This ecohydraulic modeling approach can help watershed managers prioritize riverine restoration for increased hydraulic variability to improve/restore aquatic and riparian seedling recruitment habitat over large spatial scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The importance of floodplain width on hydraulic variability and aquatic-riparian habitat in semi-confined, regulated river systems\",\"authors\":\"Rohan Benjankar , Daniele Tonina , Andrew W. Tranmer , Sabin Paudel , Aruna Shrestha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hydraulic variability (e.g., reach-scale heterogeneity of depth, velocity, and shear stress) can generate diverse riverine habitat conditions that support species biodiversity and ecological resilience. To evaluate hydraulic variability over a range of discharges from seasonal low flow to overbank flood, we used a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model to simulate depth (<em>D</em>), velocity (<em>V</em>), shear stress (τ), and the hydromorphological index of diversity (<em>HMID</em>), a dimensionless index used to characterize hydraulic heterogeneity. Simulated hydraulics were also used to evaluate aquatic (bull trout rearing) and riparian (cottonwood and willow seedling recruitment) habitat quality. We compared each of these metrics against the dimensionless relative floodplain width (<em>W*</em>) of individual (1 km long) reaches over 22 km of a semi-confined gravel-bed river system.</div><div>Hydraulic variability, aquatic habitat, and riparian forest recruitment depended on discharge and <em>W*</em>. Hydraulic variability generally decreased with increasing discharge but increased with greater <em>W*</em>. Confined reaches (<em>W*</em> < 2.5) maintained low hydraulic variability regardless of discharge, whereas less confined reaches (<em>W*</em> > 2.5) exhibited greater variability during higher flows. Aquatic habitat quality also generally decreased as discharge increased because velocities became too fast in the channel for bull trout rearing habitat. The influence of <em>W*</em> was most important for aquatic habitat during higher discharges when greater off-channel habitat in the floodplain became hydraulically connected and increased habitat quality and area. Hydraulic variability during sub-bankfull discharges was not important for aquatic habitat, but became critical during overbank flow when hydraulic refuge was necessary during flood conditions. In contrast, overbank floods provided critical riparian recruitment processes that increased with greater <em>W*</em>. This ecohydraulic modeling approach can help watershed managers prioritize riverine restoration for increased hydraulic variability to improve/restore aquatic and riparian seedling recruitment habitat over large spatial scales.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001259\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001259","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The importance of floodplain width on hydraulic variability and aquatic-riparian habitat in semi-confined, regulated river systems
Hydraulic variability (e.g., reach-scale heterogeneity of depth, velocity, and shear stress) can generate diverse riverine habitat conditions that support species biodiversity and ecological resilience. To evaluate hydraulic variability over a range of discharges from seasonal low flow to overbank flood, we used a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model to simulate depth (D), velocity (V), shear stress (τ), and the hydromorphological index of diversity (HMID), a dimensionless index used to characterize hydraulic heterogeneity. Simulated hydraulics were also used to evaluate aquatic (bull trout rearing) and riparian (cottonwood and willow seedling recruitment) habitat quality. We compared each of these metrics against the dimensionless relative floodplain width (W*) of individual (1 km long) reaches over 22 km of a semi-confined gravel-bed river system.
Hydraulic variability, aquatic habitat, and riparian forest recruitment depended on discharge and W*. Hydraulic variability generally decreased with increasing discharge but increased with greater W*. Confined reaches (W* < 2.5) maintained low hydraulic variability regardless of discharge, whereas less confined reaches (W* > 2.5) exhibited greater variability during higher flows. Aquatic habitat quality also generally decreased as discharge increased because velocities became too fast in the channel for bull trout rearing habitat. The influence of W* was most important for aquatic habitat during higher discharges when greater off-channel habitat in the floodplain became hydraulically connected and increased habitat quality and area. Hydraulic variability during sub-bankfull discharges was not important for aquatic habitat, but became critical during overbank flow when hydraulic refuge was necessary during flood conditions. In contrast, overbank floods provided critical riparian recruitment processes that increased with greater W*. This ecohydraulic modeling approach can help watershed managers prioritize riverine restoration for increased hydraulic variability to improve/restore aquatic and riparian seedling recruitment habitat over large spatial scales.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.