半封闭调节河系中洪泛平原宽度对水力变异性和水生河岸生境的重要性

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Rohan Benjankar , Daniele Tonina , Andrew W. Tranmer , Sabin Paudel , Aruna Shrestha
{"title":"半封闭调节河系中洪泛平原宽度对水力变异性和水生河岸生境的重要性","authors":"Rohan Benjankar ,&nbsp;Daniele Tonina ,&nbsp;Andrew W. Tranmer ,&nbsp;Sabin Paudel ,&nbsp;Aruna Shrestha","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydraulic variability (e.g., reach-scale heterogeneity of depth, velocity, and shear stress) can generate diverse riverine habitat conditions that support species biodiversity and ecological resilience. To evaluate hydraulic variability over a range of discharges from seasonal low flow to overbank flood, we used a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model to simulate depth (<em>D</em>), velocity (<em>V</em>), shear stress (τ), and the hydromorphological index of diversity (<em>HMID</em>), a dimensionless index used to characterize hydraulic heterogeneity. Simulated hydraulics were also used to evaluate aquatic (bull trout rearing) and riparian (cottonwood and willow seedling recruitment) habitat quality. We compared each of these metrics against the dimensionless relative floodplain width (<em>W*</em>) of individual (1 km long) reaches over 22 km of a semi-confined gravel-bed river system.</div><div>Hydraulic variability, aquatic habitat, and riparian forest recruitment depended on discharge and <em>W*</em>. Hydraulic variability generally decreased with increasing discharge but increased with greater <em>W*</em>. Confined reaches (<em>W*</em> &lt; 2.5) maintained low hydraulic variability regardless of discharge, whereas less confined reaches (<em>W*</em> &gt; 2.5) exhibited greater variability during higher flows. Aquatic habitat quality also generally decreased as discharge increased because velocities became too fast in the channel for bull trout rearing habitat. The influence of <em>W*</em> was most important for aquatic habitat during higher discharges when greater off-channel habitat in the floodplain became hydraulically connected and increased habitat quality and area. Hydraulic variability during sub-bankfull discharges was not important for aquatic habitat, but became critical during overbank flow when hydraulic refuge was necessary during flood conditions. In contrast, overbank floods provided critical riparian recruitment processes that increased with greater <em>W*</em>. This ecohydraulic modeling approach can help watershed managers prioritize riverine restoration for increased hydraulic variability to improve/restore aquatic and riparian seedling recruitment habitat over large spatial scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The importance of floodplain width on hydraulic variability and aquatic-riparian habitat in semi-confined, regulated river systems\",\"authors\":\"Rohan Benjankar ,&nbsp;Daniele Tonina ,&nbsp;Andrew W. Tranmer ,&nbsp;Sabin Paudel ,&nbsp;Aruna Shrestha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Hydraulic variability (e.g., reach-scale heterogeneity of depth, velocity, and shear stress) can generate diverse riverine habitat conditions that support species biodiversity and ecological resilience. To evaluate hydraulic variability over a range of discharges from seasonal low flow to overbank flood, we used a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model to simulate depth (<em>D</em>), velocity (<em>V</em>), shear stress (τ), and the hydromorphological index of diversity (<em>HMID</em>), a dimensionless index used to characterize hydraulic heterogeneity. Simulated hydraulics were also used to evaluate aquatic (bull trout rearing) and riparian (cottonwood and willow seedling recruitment) habitat quality. We compared each of these metrics against the dimensionless relative floodplain width (<em>W*</em>) of individual (1 km long) reaches over 22 km of a semi-confined gravel-bed river system.</div><div>Hydraulic variability, aquatic habitat, and riparian forest recruitment depended on discharge and <em>W*</em>. Hydraulic variability generally decreased with increasing discharge but increased with greater <em>W*</em>. Confined reaches (<em>W*</em> &lt; 2.5) maintained low hydraulic variability regardless of discharge, whereas less confined reaches (<em>W*</em> &gt; 2.5) exhibited greater variability during higher flows. Aquatic habitat quality also generally decreased as discharge increased because velocities became too fast in the channel for bull trout rearing habitat. The influence of <em>W*</em> was most important for aquatic habitat during higher discharges when greater off-channel habitat in the floodplain became hydraulically connected and increased habitat quality and area. Hydraulic variability during sub-bankfull discharges was not important for aquatic habitat, but became critical during overbank flow when hydraulic refuge was necessary during flood conditions. In contrast, overbank floods provided critical riparian recruitment processes that increased with greater <em>W*</em>. This ecohydraulic modeling approach can help watershed managers prioritize riverine restoration for increased hydraulic variability to improve/restore aquatic and riparian seedling recruitment habitat over large spatial scales.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001259\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001259","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水力变异性(如水深、流速和剪应力的河段尺度异质性)可产生多样化的河流生境条件,从而支持物种的生物多样性和生态恢复能力。为了评估从季节性低流量到决堤洪水等一系列排水量下的水力变异性,我们使用二维水动力模型模拟了水深 (D)、流速 (V)、剪应力 (τ) 和水文形态多样性指数 (HMID)(一种用于描述水力异质性的无量纲指数)。模拟水力学还被用于评估水生(牛鳟鱼饲养)和河岸(木棉和柳树幼苗生长)栖息地的质量。我们将这些指标与半封闭砾石床河流系统 22 公里长的单个(1 公里长)河段的无量纲相对洪泛区宽度(W*)进行了比较。水力变异性通常随着排水量的增加而减小,但随着 W* 的增大而增大。封闭的河段(W* < 2.5)无论排水量如何都保持较低的水力变异性,而封闭程度较低的河段(W* > 2.5)则在流量较大时表现出更大的变异性。水生栖息地的质量也随着排水量的增加而普遍下降,因为河道中的流速过快,不利于公牛鳟栖息。W* 对水生栖息地的影响在较大流量时最为重要,因为此时洪泛区更多的河道外栖息地在水力作用下相互连接,从而提高了栖息地的质量和面积。低于满库水位时的水力变化对水生生境并不重要,但在洪水条件下需要水力庇护时,过岸流对水生生境的影响就变得至关重要。与此相反,越库洪水提供了关键的河岸恢复过程,并随着 W* 的增大而增加。这种生态水力模型方法可以帮助流域管理者确定河流修复的优先次序,以增加水力变异性,从而在大空间尺度上改善/恢复水生生物和河岸幼苗的生长栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The importance of floodplain width on hydraulic variability and aquatic-riparian habitat in semi-confined, regulated river systems
Hydraulic variability (e.g., reach-scale heterogeneity of depth, velocity, and shear stress) can generate diverse riverine habitat conditions that support species biodiversity and ecological resilience. To evaluate hydraulic variability over a range of discharges from seasonal low flow to overbank flood, we used a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model to simulate depth (D), velocity (V), shear stress (τ), and the hydromorphological index of diversity (HMID), a dimensionless index used to characterize hydraulic heterogeneity. Simulated hydraulics were also used to evaluate aquatic (bull trout rearing) and riparian (cottonwood and willow seedling recruitment) habitat quality. We compared each of these metrics against the dimensionless relative floodplain width (W*) of individual (1 km long) reaches over 22 km of a semi-confined gravel-bed river system.
Hydraulic variability, aquatic habitat, and riparian forest recruitment depended on discharge and W*. Hydraulic variability generally decreased with increasing discharge but increased with greater W*. Confined reaches (W* < 2.5) maintained low hydraulic variability regardless of discharge, whereas less confined reaches (W* > 2.5) exhibited greater variability during higher flows. Aquatic habitat quality also generally decreased as discharge increased because velocities became too fast in the channel for bull trout rearing habitat. The influence of W* was most important for aquatic habitat during higher discharges when greater off-channel habitat in the floodplain became hydraulically connected and increased habitat quality and area. Hydraulic variability during sub-bankfull discharges was not important for aquatic habitat, but became critical during overbank flow when hydraulic refuge was necessary during flood conditions. In contrast, overbank floods provided critical riparian recruitment processes that increased with greater W*. This ecohydraulic modeling approach can help watershed managers prioritize riverine restoration for increased hydraulic variability to improve/restore aquatic and riparian seedling recruitment habitat over large spatial scales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信